The High Court · 2025

2.B.K.oakwoodEStateS'apartnershipfirm,havingitsofficeatBaitulAziz - noJO No. '12. Baniara nitls, UyOeraUid, represent6d by Arshad Ayub' sorl of the late l/ohamm6d AIi, aqed'about 57 yebrs, occupation Business' resident oi L"G View Apartments L-3, Road No. 1, Banlara Hills, Hyderabad'

3. lmaduddin Farooqi, son of the late Raoofuddin Farooqi, aged about 17 yeats' - resiJent of Flat No- C 412,2. B.K. Oakwood Estates, a partnership firm, Road No' 12.. Baniara -Hills' Hyderabad' nivrng its office at Biit ut reoredented bv Arshad Ayub, son of the late Mohammed Ali' aged about 5T v"ut..rt i;"irpiiion Busineis. resident of Lake View Agartments L3 Road No' 1, Baniara Hills, HYderabad. 'Aziz

4. Bader-e.Alam Quadri, son of the late Durvesh Alam Qua-dri, aged about 62 F;; Ltia"nt or No 8-2-684/3/1/1, No. 12' Banlara Hills, Hyderabad' ' -ag9-g ?b9'l 70 years' resident of Brdeze Apartments, Flat No. A-2, Plot No.69, MLA Colony' No 12' tsaniara Hills, Hyderabad.

5. Asgheri Ahmed, wife of Naseeruddin Ahmed, -

6.sardarTrilokSinghPishoria,sonoJRamSinghPishoria.,agedabo-ut,47 vears. resident o-f 6-9-120, Mirra fMansion, Jalprakash Narayan uolony' Serilingampally Colony, Ranga Reddy District. 7'sadhanaKaur'wifeofSardarTrilokSingh,agedaboutQgyears,residentof 6-9120, [Vlirra Mansion, Jalprakash Narayan Colony, Serilingampally uolony' Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND I 2 3 The State of Telangana, represented by . its Principal Secretary' Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District' The Station House Officer, Ivliyapur Police Station, Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District. 4 G. Yegnamurthy, son of late S.Y. Govindarajan, I led about 53 years, occupation Working Abroad, represented by Yegnapri I tharath, daughter of the late S.Y.Govindarajan, aged 51 years, occupatio I Government Servant, resident of Plot No. 39, Avanthi Nagar, Bashee Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lrrrl circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the, pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particulal Writ of Mandamus, declaring the registration of Crim I 01.08.20'15 by the 3rd respondent is as an abuse of execut \ violative of judicial precedents, law and fundamental rigi quash the same and pass I.A. NO: 1 OF 20'tS(WVMP. NO: 3806 OF 201s) ...RESPONDENTS r praying that in the High Cou rt may be one in the nature of No 49712015 dated ) powers vested in it, s and consequently Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r rumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rr y be pleased vacate the interim order dated 12-08-2015 passed in W.P.t\,t F No. 32830/2015 in W.P.No. 2529012015 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 32830 OF 2015) Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the c r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr; y be pleased to stay the investrgation of Crime No.497l2015 dated 01.08.201 5 on the file of p.S. Miyapur, including arrest of the Petitioner, pending disposal ( the Writ petition; a l.A. NO: 3 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 43221 oF 201s) Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the crr the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou- direct the Writ Petitioners/ Respondents 1 to 7 herein either Hon'ble Court an amount of Rs.35,44,000/- (Rupees Thirty - Thousand only) together with interest @ 24% per annum i line with the terms and condrtrons as contemplated under lt dated 28-05-2008 or create suffrcient Security/ Guarantee f,r order to protect the interest of this petitioner/4th respondent umstances stated in may be pleased to c deposit before the ve Lakhs Forty Four )m the due date, in : Agreement to Sell the said amount, in l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016 (WVMP. NO: 597 OF 20 16) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the_ circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP.No. 32830 of 2015 in WP.No 25290 ot 2015 dt. 12.8.2015 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 10059 OF 2016) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to place additional material papers as evidence in the above writ petition to be treated as additional evidence in the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners :Ms. S. PUSHPA JAISWAL' REP. FOR SRI V RAMCHANDER GOUD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI V RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAK]I SHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2529O of 2015 ORDER Today, ',r,hen the matter is taken up for hearrr 1 Mr. S.Pushkar Jarswal, Iearned counsel representing Mr.V. RanL, hander Goud, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that n .,,iew of the subsequent development, the cause in this writ pt tion no ionger survives for adjudication and thc same may b: dis missed as infructuous.

2. Having regard to the above made submission, I Le Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order : ; to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applicalr: rs, if any, shall stand closed. t1 To, SI) K.BHAVANI SWAMY AS,I ISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYii .rsEcTtoN oFF|CER

4. One CC to SRl. V RATVCHANDER GOUD, Advocate [t ]UCl One CC to SRt V RADHAKRTSHNA MURTHY, Advoczrj : tOpUCl Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME, High Court forthe State I Tetangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies o PVL BS I HIGH COURT DATED:1 510912025 ORDER WP.No.25290 ot 2015 a 5 (, C T HE SIErt 3 't I riB 2026 ;o * :i: DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t1b,\)t -}I