M/s. Power Mech Projects Pvt. Ltd., Lohia Towers, Patamata, Vijayawada v. The Commercial Tax Officer, Benz Circle, Vijayawada & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The Commercial Tax Officer, Benz Circle, Vijayawada and another. ..Respondents. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 14331 of 2005 ORDER: (Per Sri B. Sudershan Redy, J) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner…
Judgment
M/s. Power Mech Projects Pvt. Ltd., Lohia Towers, Patamata, Vijayawada, represented by its Executive Director, G. Srinivasulu. ..Petitioner. And
The Commercial Tax Officer, Benz Circle, Vijayawada and another. ..Respondents. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 14331 of 2005 ORDER: (Per Sri B. Sudershan Redy, J) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the Department and at their request, the matter is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. Rule Nisi. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing statutory C-declaration forms to him to carry on his business as illegal and unjustified. The petitioner made request to the competent authority to issue C- declaration forms in order to enable him to carry on his business. The authority is bound to issue C-declaration forms as such issuance itself would not confer any additional benefit or right upon the dealer, which he otherwise does not have under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 as well as the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. For the aforesaid reasons, we direct the respondents herein to issue C- declaration forms to the petitioner, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition shall accordingly stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (B. Sudershan Reddy, J) (Ramesh Ranganathan, J) 03-08-2005 sj/msv
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 03 Aug 2005. The bench was B SUDERSHAN REDDY, RAMESH RANGANATHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.