The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Rrlspondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY counsel for Respondents No.2to7 tsltSs?=r?HARREDD\" ' Counsel for Respondent No.8 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made ttre following: ORDER ; THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRTT PE TITION No.11 114 0F 2o25 )..:1 . ORD ER: With the consent of both the parties,.this Writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ petiriorr IS filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: .f n"ff:;:'T:.ffi'rX;l::".,: nore-partlcutarLs one u1 the tuture of wnt t-r suppts ,.- , rii.'' J'o' ii,[rfru-"!,jl,"i:^'^:: ' to pro|ido eredncits r onn'ection ';:,'-f,y;:#i.,H ;:,,:;! /::,:;,:i;,;:"J';;:;;',;:,::';:*:i{: i;:;'i:Jyt sutuelt Nos.toj j/., o ,o l"'lI!'ital Bu.ildig in Plot.No.374 "r; aE;i, x,..!i.!"::, .1^ri:,.)'' zi'oi"'ii,l!,"x'ffffiii.?,,'f;"oo.'7.'1'o'. .,,."o*n nor"" o, "noi"iv". ";;; j;;*:": rytkojsti Dlstrict' t.s.. boundcd by Nontt: no szo; we*,r:'io;;; :;'bi]'i:"Yl' ",1.,!^!," !.g0., Eost: Housc on ptot ;I{#; {::": ":!;^*:; p2ia;"," i"o ni1;',;;', ;:ii';:","ff::, i:';i::;y aboue refefted premises * ,tt"got r,na ol*ttrirl and pass..." 3' Heard smt.Thakur 866p2 Singh, iearned counser for the petitioner; learned Government pleader for Energr ibr respondent No.1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 7; and Sri K.Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.g.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ petitiron is squarely covered by the order of this t t I i i i 2 PK,J lp .Ll la 2025 Court in W P Nc TO3O of 2O2O ' dated 20'04 2020' anf rer:luested this Court lc pa s s similar order in the present Writ E etitr'rn also' The same is r_r.t seriousry disputed by the learned Govr)rnment Pleader as w :ll rtr; Iearned Standing Counsel for the respon':lents' In vi':rr of 'he above submissions and for the reasonsl a1lke in 5. the ordcr of this Court in W P'No 603 O of 2O2O ' datec 20 C4 '2O2O ' this Writ Pe iti(rll is disposed of directing the respondents i.o release the power s upply to the premises of the petitioner s ubjt cl to the compliancrc of lhe terms and conditions and on lurni shing an undertakin 1 -rl produce the occupancy certi fic' te lrom the concerne<1 Munrcrpai corporation within a prescribed per,od, and if no such o(cu1)ilncy certificate is produced within su:h psriod' it is ope[. to 1-h-: r': spondents to take appropriate action in trccordance u.ith lar,r'. Misr el1ir:reous petitions pending, if any' shall stzrnd closed There sh.a I b: no order as to costs,. SD' K. S lEE RAMA /ITRUE COPYII SECTION MU GIS R T Y AR ICER To, 1 2 4 ili,[l'iHl,r"?"L'il?Y-looffi"'''lnoEnersvDeea:e:t fiisiwl*+tYiJl'ill'n'l[3'J:'io:t15:[*%1? Hyderalrad l)uuuuJ ^ _*ercial/, corporate office/ T The Chref llngineer Comm Engineer/ Operation/' Cybercity C The Sr perirrtending :l:T::,"'' Ensineer/operation/ ,r Kondapur Division' u' Secretariat' State of ?L=ll','HlJ,?t8'?'TSs'lJ 3 s I' Dc L, Hyderabad ircle TGSPDCL' TGSPDC L I I i I l I i I I I : I t I ,/'- *

6. The Assistant Divisional Engineer/, Operation/ KPHB Sub - Division TGSP DC L, Hyderabad

7. The Assistant Engineer/, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Balajinagar TGSP DC L, Hyderabad

8. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Kukatpally Circle.

9. One CC to SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate. IOPUC] 10.Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 1'1 . One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCUTRANSCO loPUCl '12 One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHruC. [OPUC]

13.Two CD Copies. BSK BS / r l HIGH COURT DATED:151O+12025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.11114 of 2025 (, i l' (\ rE ST4 i )€ 2' APfl 2[6 ''.,.t , j ..\. .:: .,.:.ii * ;.', -?F Al,.|1\:'r' ..7 ta -:.-'-;-e-if 7' l'j \ \ i I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS // I 4 {