Sri. K.V.B.K. Sharma, S/o K v. Prabhakar Rao, Aged

3. Sri. K.V.B.K. Sharma, S/o K V. Prabhakar Rao, Aged 32 yrs' Occ Soflware " Enoin""i RJo Flat rui" l'o': aiJaii Resioe;'cv1 Raleev Gandhi Nagar' Ba6hupallY, HYderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary (Home) Department' Secretariat, Hyderabad- TheCommissionerofPoliceCyberabad,Cyberabadcommissionerate'at Gachibowli, RR District. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhapur Zone, Cyberabad commissronerate at Gachibowli, RR District. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kukatpally' Cyberabad commissionerate at Kukatpally, RR District. The Station House Officer, K P.H.B. Police station' Cyberabad commissionerate RR District. The Station House Officer, Miyapur Police station, Cyberabad commissionerate at Miyapur, RR District. The Station House Officer, Cybercrimes Police station, Cyberabad, comrntssionrate, at Gachibowli, RR District, yrs, K.N.V. Kiranmayee, W/o. K.V.B.K. Sharma, D/o K.V. Narayana,ag-e- O-c. ttomeopatfry boctor, Rl/o MIG-87/1, KPHB Road No l, KPHB Colony' Hyderabad. K.V. Narayana, S/o K- Hanumanth Rao, Age- 64 yrs, Occ. Advocate Rl/o MIG- 87l1, KPHB Road No.1 , KPHB Colony, Hyderabad. ^30 '10. V. Prameela Ranr, W/o. K.V. Narayana, Age. 63 ) r Employee, R/o MIG-87/1, KPHB Road No.1, KPHB Colcr 11. Sri Bhujanga Rao, S/o. Not known to the petition-ers, /\ Commidsio"ner of police Kukatpally, R/o. C/o. ACP 1 District. , Occ. Retd Govt. / Hyderabad. r:. Major, Occ. Asst lice Kukatpallv RR

12. Sri D. Ir4ahesh, S/o. Not known to the petitioners, Age' Nli KPHB, Police Station Kukatpally, RR District 1rrr, Occ. Sl of police,

13. Sri T. Sridhar, S/o. Not known to the petitioners, Age. N ' KPHB, Police Station Kukatpally, RR Dtstrict.

14. Sri Srikanth Goud, S/o. Not known to the petitioners, ,\'; police, KPHB, Potice Station Kukatpally, RR District 15. Sri Sudhershan Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitiont:rs lof police, Cyber Crimes Cyberabad comm issioner;llc District. or, Occ Sl of police, . tvlalor, Occ. C. lof ,\ge. tr/a1or, Occ. C. at Gachibowli, RR

16.Sri Vijayawardhan Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitiorr rs, Ag S. t of folice, Cyber Crimes Cyberabad commissioneri t ), at G District. e. Major, Occ. achibowli, RR

17. Sri Siddeshwar (unidentified Person), S/o. Not known t ) the pelrtroners, .Age' tvlajor, Occ. Not known to the petitioners, Commissi( I 'r of Police ottlce / CV6Li Cii.". Police Station, CySerabad commissioner t -', at Gachibowli' RR District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnd i circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other W i declaring the high handed action of the respondents No 1 ll: respondent No. 4 to 7 foisting the f alse, frivolous, fabricat: routine manner with the influence of the respondent No. 8 t improper, illegal, inlustice, abuse of process of Law, violatir and personal liberty guaranteed by the Article 21 of con; Consequential relief as call for the records pertainingto ti { registered by the police under influence and for settlement I under guise of FIR No.580 of 2017 Dated. 15-11.2017 PS : lPC, 66C lT Act. is declare as illegai null and void and asf abuse of process of law, Further direction to the respondert action as per the representation Dated.5-3-2018 against th: to 17 while according protection to the petitioners from the ( foisting /registration of further false series of cases and to p. ...RESPONDENTS rraying that in the ligh Court may be order or d irection Z in the capacity of I series of cases in r 10 is as arbitrary, I the natural justrce tution of lndia with foisting false case rr: matrimonial case rbercrimes, U/s 509 ,isted false case as I'1o.2 to take proper Respondents No. 8 spondents including s,s such other order or orders as this Honble court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all the proceedings of investigatron in FIR No.580 of 2017 Dated: 15.11.2017 PS Cybercrlmes, U/s 509 lPC, 66C lT Act including arrest and foisting /registration of further false series of cases, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms.G.V.S.SSRUTHl, rep., SRI G.L'NARASIMHA RAO counsel for the Respondents No.1to7 : SRI D.PRADEEP, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.8to17 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.TUKAF AMJI WRIT PETITION No.9444 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of the C: rstitution of lndia seeking the following relief "...1o lssue a writ, order or direction more pafticularl', nature of writ of mandamus declaring the high handz the respondents No 1 lto17 in the capacity of respo't to 7 foisting the false, frivolous, fabricated series , routine manner with the influence of the respondent lrc as arbitrary, tmproper, illegal, injustice, abuse of pr<>ct violating the natural justice and personal liberty gua the Article 21 of constitution of lndia with Consequer,t call for the records peftaining to the foisting false case by the police under influence and for settlement the r case under guise of FIR No.580 of 2017 Dated. 151 Cybercrimes. U/s 5O9 lPC, 66C lT Act. is declare a; and void and as foisted false case as abuse of prort Fufther direction to the respondent No.2 to take props per the representation Dated.5-3-2018 against the Re No. 8 fo 17 while according protection to the petition,t respondents including foisting hegistration of fufther I of cases and to pass such other order or orders as I Coui may deems fit just and proper in the circumstat case and fo pass,.. " ne in the I action of k>nt No. 4 cases ln 8to10is ;s of Law, )nteed by ); relief as rzgistered atrimonial 2017 PS ilegal null ss of /aw, action as ;pondents s from the /se serles ,rs Honble ces of the

2. Heard Ms.G.V.S.S.Sruthi, learned couns€ representing Mr.G.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petrtic tars and Heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for l-[ rre appearing for respondents No.1 to 7.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, che l-'nging the high- handed action of the respondents/police authorities in registe r ng Crime No. 580 2 .-' of 2017 under the influence of the unofficial respondents, the present petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, upon completion of the investigation in Crime No. 580 of 2017, a charge sheet was filed, and the case was taken on file as Calendar Case No. 4839 of 2021 before the learned Vlll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kukatpally. After due trial, the accused were acquitted on 31 .07.2023. Hence, the contention of the petitioners does not subsist as on date.

5. I have perused the material available on record

6. Having regard to the grievance of the petitioners and the developments that transpired during the pendency of this petition, and in view of the fact that the proceedings in the said crime have culminated in an acquittal, it is evldent that the grievance of the petitioners stands effectively redressed. ln this view of the matter, nothing further remains in this petition for consideration.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. sD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to SRI G.L.NARASIMHA RAO' Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court fo VOCA loPUCl a Two CD CoPies BSK TJ -/<'1J r State of Telangana. [OUT] .jaffi IhE S l4 qI Y ir a? )t r'l 1i *<, Or'- :.t4r * + Z (.) .4., i, HIGH COURT DATED:31 11012025 I oo )- I ORDER WP.No.9444 of 2018 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS to4"s8 {n /r' qlvlla