The High Court · 2025

53.Smt. Kurma Ravulamma, \y'//o. Kurma Gangaram, 68 years (died, per LR at Sl. No.76, 77)

54. Kurma Bhoomanna, S/o. Gangaram, 54 years

55. Kurma Muthenna, S/o. Gangaram, 49 years

56. Kurma Mallaiah, S/o. Rajamallu, 48 years

57. Nakkala Prashanth Kumar, S/o. Nakkala Muthenna, 37 years 5S.Nakkala Narsimloo, S/o. Chinnaiah, 71 years, (died per LRs RR 121-122)

59.Nakkala Devanna, S/o. Chinnaiah,TT years

60. Pippera Sayanna, S/o. Muthenna, 69 years 6l.Pippera Narsa Reddy, S/o. Devanna, 32 years

62. Pipperla Narsa Reddy, S/o- Devanna, 32 years

63. Palle Devanna(died), S/o. Ramuloo (LR at St. No. 78, 79)

64. Palle Chinnaiah, S/o. Chinnaiah, 52 years

65. Palle Hanumandloo, S/o. Damanna, 62 years

66. Palem Narsa Reddy, S/o. Damanna, 53 years

67. Pipperla Chityala Raja Reddy, S/c. Bhojanna, 69 years (died per L.R- Rl23)

68. Palem Bhoom Reddy, S/o. Gangaram, 6'1 years

69. Pipperla Bhojanna, S/o. Bhojanna, 62 years

70. Smt. Nakkala Narsu Bai, D/o. Nakkala Muthenna, 65 years 71 . Smt. Bheemarthi Gangu Bai, W/o. [\Iuthenna, 68 years

72. Bheemarthi Gangadhar, S/o. Nrluthenna, 48 years (SL.No. 71 and 12 are brought on record as per orders in lA No. 230812002, dt: 05.09.2002)

73.Smt. Palle Gangavva, W/o. Devanna,65 years

74.Palle Srinu, S/o. Devanna, 26 years (SL.No. 73 and 74 are brought on record ) as per orders in lA No. 230912002, dt: 05.09.2002)

75.Gundla Pedda fVluthanna, S/o. Pedda Pochanna, 45 years (Brought on record as perorders in lA No. 231012002, dt: 05.09.2002)

76. Kurma Muthenna, S/o. Gangaram, 54 years

77. Kurma Bhumanna, S/o. Gangaram, 57 years (SL.No. 7t) and 77 are brought on record as perorders in lA No. 231112002, dt: 05.09.2tr02) 78- Smt. Palle Gangawa, Wo. Devanna, 65 years

79. Palle Srinu, S/o. Devanna, 26 years (SL.No. 78 and 79 .rr(l brought on record as per orders in lA No. 231212002, dt: 05.09.2002)

80. Smt. Naleshwar Devubai, W/o. Narayana, 59 years (Broug;ht on record as per orders in lA No. 2998/2002, dt: 0910.2002) All R/o Badguna Village, Nandipet Mandal, Nizamabad District. Bl.Chilka Chinnakka W/o Chilka Venkat Age.65 Yrs Rl/o B;rdguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of Ra)

82.Andhe Kalavathi W/o Gangadhar Age 50 Yrs Rl/o Badgura (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of RO)

83.Bhima(hi Rukumbai W/o Bhumanna Age 50 Yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (lV), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R10)

84.Bhimarthi Srinivas S/o Bhumanna Age.35 Yrs R/o Badgura (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R10)

35.Bhimarthi Linganna S/o Linganna Age.60 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of Rl 1)

86.Bhimarthi Bhumanna Sio Muthenna Age 40 Yrs R/o Bad'luna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R12)

87. Bhimarthi Chinnaiah S/o Linganna Age.50 Yrs Fl/o Ba,iguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R13)

38.Bheemarthi Laxminarayana S/o Chinna Bhumaiah Age 10 Yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (tv1), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of Rl 5)

89. Bheemarthi Srinu S/o Chinna Bhumanna Age.35 Yrs Rio Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist)

90. Mera Chinnubai D/o Chinnaiah Age.65 Yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R18)

91. Gundla Bingi Posani Wo Pedda Gangaram Age.70 Yrs Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R20)

92. Gundla Bingi Babanna S/o Pedda Gangaram Age.45 Y.s R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (l\,4), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R20)

93. Bingi Posani W/o Chinna Gangaram Age.70 Yrs R/o BaJl;una (V), Nandipet (lvl), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R21)

94. Bingi Gangadhar Sio Chinna Gangaram Age.45 Yrs lVo Badguna (V), Nandipet (lt/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R21 )

95.Gundla Binqi Ramulu S/o Pochiga Age 47 Yrs FUo Badguna (V)' Nandipet - - (lvl), Nizama-bad (Dist) (LR of R23) t

96.Gundla Binqi Bhumanna s/o Pochiga Age.44 Yrs R:/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamibad (Dist) (LR of R23) gT.Sambari chinnaiah S/o Linganna Age.55 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (v), Nandipet (M)' Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R25) gB.Sambari Ramdas S/o Chinnaiah Age 60 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V)' Nandipet (M)' Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R26)

99. Sdmbari Laxminarayana s/o chinnaiah . Age.50 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (v)' - -'r.rinaipet (M), Nizamlbad (Dist) (LR of R26)

100. Remma Laxmi w/o chinnaiah Age.60 Yrs Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R28) 101 . Remma Ravi S/o Chinnaiah Age.35 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R28) 1O2. Gundla Bingi Lasumbai w/o Devanna Age.60 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V)' Nandipet (M), Niza-mabad (Dist) (LR of R31)

103. Gundla Bingi Babanna s/o Devanna Age 30 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V)' - Nandipet (M), Niza-mabad (Dist) (LR of R31) lo4BinoiGanqubaiWoChinnaBabugaThontiAge.60YrsRl/oBadguna '- tVl, f.f unOiiut (M[ Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R32)

105. Bingi Babanna S/o Chinna Bgbuga '- (V), r.fanOi"pet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R32) -Tnonti Age 35 Yrs Rl/o Badguna 106 Binoi Babanna S/o Chinna Poshanna Age 45 Yrs Fl/o Badguna (v), Nandipet (-M1, Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R36) 1O7. Gundla Bingi Pedda Swami S/o G-angubai Age 40 Yrs Fl/o Badguna - "Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R37) (V), Nandipet (M), (V), NandiPet (M), Nizamabad (Dist)

108. Gundla Bingi Chinna Swami M/o Gangubai Age 35 Yrs Fl/o Badguna 109. Gundla Bingi Muthenna S/o Pedda Makkanna Age 50 Yrs R Rl/o '""auogu;;tVj, r'r"nalp"t (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LF' of R38) ll0.GundlaBingiBabannaS/oMakk.annaAge.4BYrsPJoBadguna(V), '-Nandipet (M), Niza-mabad (Dist) (LR of R38) 111 . Gundla GangubaiW/o Pocha11a, Age B0 yrs' Fl/o Badguna (V)' Nandipet (M), Nizaniabad (Dist) (LR of R41)

112. Gundla Chinna Gangu D/o Poglalla' Age 55 yrs' Fl/o Badguna (V)' Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R41 )

113. Bingi Poshani W/o Makka, Age 75 yrs' 'Rl/o Badguna (V)' Nandipet (M)' Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R43)

114. Binqi Babanna S/o Makkanna, Age 48 yrs, Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizariabad (Dist) (LR of R43)

115. Gundla Bingi Lokam S/o Pedda Babann a Age.42 Yrs R/o Badguna (V)' ' 'lanOipet 1V), Nizimabad (Dist) (LR of R45) -* .. r-rY.*i,

116. Tharu Bholanna S/o Yellaboi Age 38 Yrs R/o BadgLrna (V)' Nandipet ' '"ir'rrl, r.rliitnJoao (bisu (LR of R48) 117 Nakala Prashant S/o Muthenna Age.45 Yrs Fl/o Badgurra (V), Nandipet ' ''tMl, Nizamibad (Dist) (LR of 51) 1 18. Nakala Bhojavva W/o Narsa Reddy Age 55 Yrs FV: Badguna (V)' ' '\rnaip"ilil[ uizamauao (Dist) (LR of R51) 1 19. Nakkala Rarnreddy S/o Narsimloo' Age 60 Yrs F /o Badguna (V)' ' '"rl"noip"ii'nlti' Nizamabad'(Dist) (LR of R52) l l2o.NakkalaNarsa-ReddyS/oNarsimlooAge.55YrsR,oBadgunalV), ''"tlrnoip"iitrrt), Nizamauad (Dist) (LR of R52) 121. Nakkala Ram .Reddy S/o Narsimloo Age 60 Yrs R'o Badguna (V)' '' 'rlunoip"[ivtJ, Nizamabad (ois0 (ln of R5B) l.DNakkalaChrnnaReddyS/oNarimloo,Age55yrs,Ft/oBadgrlna(V), '' i.r, no i p"i i'rvr],1'l iz a m au ao ( Di lt) (LR of R5B ) 123. Chitvala Raja Reddv s/o Chitya!1fgddy' Age 60 vrs RJo Badguna (V) ''"lrrnoipii (rfi), rliza'mauao (oist; 1la ot R0z; .. RESPONDENTS RR 81 to 123 arc hrouoht on record as LR's of lrt; 41 43 4'| 't deceased RR 8,51,52,58,67 as i;?gTi#k fil.'*:i*txitrJ'?'36'37'38 Counsel for the Appellant : GP for Appeals 2' 3' 5' Counsel for the Respondents 1 ' i. J. s, i+,16,12,1s, 24,2s,30,33'34' tb.'m'. q2,44,46,47,49, 50, 54 to 57' 59 to 62, 64 to 66, 68 to 80 Counsel for the Respondents 81 to 123 The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT: : Sri S. Niranjan ReddY : None APPeared ! HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.No.7O5 OF 2OO7 JUDGMENT: Pcr rhe Hon'bte sd J,stt.. .\bt na .1 Kan@t sttutntt When the matter is taken up lor hcaring, learned Government Pleader appearir-rg for the appeilant hacl submitted that the issue involved in this appeal is squarel-i, covered by [he jrrrlgment, dated 25.O4.2025, passed bv this Court in L.A.A.S.No.637 of 2OO7 .

2. Learned counsel appearing for the rcsp()nclcnts does not dispute about the said fact.

3. Follorving the judgment, dated 25.O4.2025 passed in L.A.A.S.No.637 of 2OO7 and for reasons alike, this Appeal is also p:r rtly allowed. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if an1,, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed. \ Sd/- A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFIGER To, The District Judge at Nizamabad' (with records' if any) Two CCs to GP for Appeals, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to Sri S. Niranjan Reddy' Advocate [OPUC] 1 2 1 Two CD CoPies d (Along with a coPY of iudgment, 2007) dated 25.04.2025 passed in LAAS No 637 of HIGH COURT DATED: 2910412025 \ ,1' ./t"'t4.'i' j' ':, ,. c 6 ,j! 2$25 ' -.,'. i t .-* ,,-),-.. JUDGMENT+DECREE LAAS.No.705 of 2007 PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS \ o 15 AK5,J & ETD,J LAAS No.637 2007 ) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.No.637 of 2OO7 (per Hon'ble Smt. Justice Tirumqlq Deui Eada) This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short 'the ActJ is preferred by the Special Deputy Collector, L.A.Cum Loc Unit, SRSP, Pochampad, aggricvcd by the order and decree dated 22.08.2006 passed in O.P.No.385 of 2OO2 by the learned District Judge at Nizamabad (hercinaftcr referred to as 'the reference CourtJ.

2. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are rcferrcd to as they were arrayed before the reference Court_

3. The facts of the case in brief are that the Government has acquired house sites, structures etc., in Ummeda Village of Nandipet Mandal, Nizamabad District for Pochampad Projcct. A draft notihcation under Section a(1) of the Act was publishcd in A.P.Gazette on 10.02.1981. The Land Acquisition Officer has passed the award on 28.O2.7987.

4. The case of the claimants is that they are residents of Ummeda village of Nandipet Mandal and the house sites, structures, drinking water wells etc., situated in Ummeda village 16 AKS,J & ETD,] LAAS No.637 2007 ) .1 were acquired by the Land Acquisition Offit e r and that dissatislied with the meager amount of competrs;ation' some people from their village filed protest application un l':r Section 18 of Act and ttre matter was referred to the Court rf Additional District Judgt', Nzamabad in O P'No 213 of 199O and that after due enquiry, the Additional District Judge' N zametbad has enhanced the compensation and also has awardec solalium and interest on thc enhanced amount vide judgment and decree dated 30.09.1994. Aggricved by the said award, the Land Acquisition Oflrcer has preferred an appeal in A'S No'2002 of l)')5 which was dismissed by the High Court on 31 03 1998' 5 The claimants in the present case who have not availed to h1e protest application under Section 18 of tl'rc Act have approached the Land Acquisition Officer under Seclion 28-A and for their him to re-determine requested the .compensation the above saitl ordcr of the acquired properties, in terms of t)isl rict Judge, Nizamabad. Finall'g, the I-and Additional Acquisition Officer has passed an award No 42198 99 dated 18.01.1999 withholding the payment of interest on solatium' which is illegal and contrary to law and that the Lrnd Acquisition Officer has arbitrarily calculated the interest on the enhanced compensatiot't only upto 15.O9.1998 though he perssed the award t7 AKS,J & ETD,I LAAS No 637 2007 ) on 18.01.1999 and that the cheques were honoured by the bank on 16.03.1999 and thus, the Land Acquisition Officer ought to have calculated the interest up to 16.03.i999. Thus, their application was referred to the District Judge, Nizamabad.

6. The reference Court has framed the following issues for adjudication: " 1. Whether the claimants are entitled for payment of interest on solatium?

2. Whether the claimants are entitled for payment of interest both on market value and solatium from 28.02.1941 b 27.02.1982 for one year at the rate of 97o and from 01.03.1981 to 16.03.1999 at the rate of 15,,/. per annum but not upto 15.9.98 as contended by the Land Acquisition Ofhcer?

3. Whether the claimarts are entitled to payment of equitable interest at the rate of 18%o on the accumulated interest in order to set off the loss arld compensate on the ground of equif5r and justice from 77.3.7999 to till date?"

7. At the time of trial, PWl was examined and Exs.Al and A2 were marked on behalf cf the claimants and on behalf of the respondents, RWl was examined and Ex.Bl was marked.

8. Based on the evidence on record, the reference Court has ordered to pay the interest on solatium as per the orders in O.P.No.213 of 1990 and also directed to calculate and pay the interest on the market value ald solatium up to 16.03.1999, the date on which the cheques were honoured by the S.B.H Gg 15% \ .-.. '1 ) - \ 18 AKS,J & ETD,J LAAS No.537 2007 per annr-rm as l)er the L.A.Act arld further directec to pay interest @1 1,2% per allnum on the accumulated intel est by way of equitable interest from 17.03_1999 tiil the payment. Aggrieved by . the said award, the appeal is preferred by the Special Deputy Collector, L.A.Cum Loc Unit, SRSP, Pochampad.

9. Heard thr: submissions of learned Government Pleader for the appellant and Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, learned :ounsel for the respondents-

10. The leerrned Government Pleader has subreitted that the order and dccree of thc rcference Court is contrilry to law and weight of evidence and further argued that the Ieierence Court has made an error in awarding equitable interest frlrn 17.O3.1999 till the date of payment (ittl2"k per annum. He furtlrer argued that the reference Court failcd to take notice of the principles laid down by the }{onble Supreme Court saying that eq r;table interest carnot be granted in such cases and that granting interest on interest is against any legal principle. He therefor-c, pra.yed to set aside the orders passed by the reference Court.

11. The learned respondents counsel, on the oth,lr hand, has submitted that the claimants have suffered a lot drrc. to the delay made in payntcnts and that they suffered loss for. none of their t/,1// 79 AKS,J & ETD,J LAAS No.637 2007 I wrongs and that they a_re very much entitled to the interest as awarded by the reference Court.

12. Based on the above rival contentions, this Cou.rt frames the following points for consideration: 1 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to interest @12%o. per annum on the accumulated interest from 17.O3.1999 titl the date of payment? Whether the order and decree of the reference Court need any interference?

3. To what relieP

13. POINT NO.1: a) The grievance of the appellalt in the present case is that the reference Court has granted interest (@12%o on the accumulated interest from 17.03.1999 till the date of pa5rment. b) The case of the claimalts is that they suffered a lot due to the delayed payment made to them and that the Land Acquisition Officer has calculated interest for one year @9%" from 28.02.1981 to 27.02.1982 and 15V" from 01.03.1981 to 15.9.1998 on the enhanced amount excluding solatium. Thus, the claimants were aggrieved by the Land Acquisition Ofhcer Award for not awarding interest on solatium. 20 AKS,J & ETD,J LAAS No 637 2007 , It is pertinent to take note of the fact that in C) P No 213 of c) 199O filed under Section 18 of the Act arising out of the same acquisition, the reference Court has enhanced the compensation and has awarded intercst on the enhanced amount llld solatium' d) The present case arises out of the other t:laimants who sought redetermination of compensation under Secti':n 28A of the Act, thus, the reference Court ought to have taken into consideration the award passed in O P'No 213 of 1!190 and should have passed the award in similar lines wherein t-h e decree has provided for payment of intercst on the enhanced amount and solatium. But it nowhere speci{ied to grant interesl on interest e) The reference Court has referred lo Sunder n' tlnion of Indial , wherein it was held that solatium ic rms part of compensation payable to the land owners, her'ce' interest is payable on the amount of solatium also' If the -eference Court has awarded interest on solatium, that could have brlen sufficient' 0 But in the prcsent case, the reference (}rurt has also awardedinterestonaccumulatedinterest'Admit:edly'thereisa d.elay in payment of compensation, when the ar:quisition has 'zoor 121 Lncc aat 27 AKS,I & ETD,., LAAS No.637 2007 I taken place in the year 1981 , the present reference was made in tL,e year 2OO2 g) The reference Court has observed that if a pleading and averment is not denied by the opposite party, it can be taken as an admission and further held that the categorical admissions of RW1 with regard to the delay in making payment show that there is inaction on part of the Land Acquisition Officer and thus, went ahead in awarding the interest on accumulated interest. h) The relevant provisions under Section 28 and 28A ofthe Act are extracted hereunder for the sake of reference: "28- Collector may be dirccted to pay interest on excess compensation. - If the sum, which the Collector did award as compensation, the award of the Court may direct that the collector shall pay interest on such excess at the ratc of lnine per centuml per annum from the date on which he took possession of the land to the date of payment of such excess into Court: Proeided that the award of the Court may also direct that where such excess or any part thereof is paid into Court after the date or expiry of a period of one year from the date on which possession is taken, interest at the ratc of fifteen per centum per Ernnum shall be payable from the date of expiry of the said period of one year on the amount of such excess or part thereof which has not been paid into Court before the date of such expiry- 28A. Re determination of the amount of compensation on the basis of the award of the Court. {1) where in an award under this part, the court allows to the applicant any amount of compensation in excess of the amount awarded by the collector under section 11, the persons interested in all the other land covered by the same notification under section 4, sub section (l) and who are also aggneved by the awaJd of the Collector may, notwithstanding that they had not made an application to the Collector under section 18, by written applicatron to the Collector within three months from the date o[ the award of the Court require that the amount of compensation payable to them may be re determined on the basis of the amount of compensation awaided by the court: Provided that in computing the period of three months within which an application to the Collector shall be made under this sub-section, tlle day on which the awa.d was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be excluded. L'* 22 A(S,I & ETD,] LAAS No.637 2007 ) i) n 12) mav. (2) rhe col' ecr ^r sh a.'. o n I e'e i prn".i :l,".tt"li1]i:'r:ft+ :; I T*j# .ondr.t an inqLrrry aIreI g'ttl-trl]i; .fi.,"s heaid, and n 'lrl-- ei,ine rn". ' r'asonable 9ll:'i:;r;1,;; oryJut.,o th. cnph 'nrs' E"t.."mi.r,ne rhe amounl ot compr {3 r Any per son who h a s nor ":::1":t" J iXff :!"nT*^i i, ::i:;5",,* L, *titr"t apPli'a.lron 10'.il ji,l".i". Court and th' -rtt ;:,';;riy ;; such I e'er en" 3s Ihcv "i'he by the coil""tor of:'"I.l: :""'ifljl';:; sections l>t to zo srrarr' e" '*. under sPction r8' :;p,;;;; "t""n"" It is nowhere mentioned in the Act that interest shall be accumulated interest 16 v"orkout equitatrle again calculated on the interest. Just because RW1 has not denied the Plea of the claimants, it does not mean to say that the reference Court should take it as an admissron by the Land Acquisitiorr Officer to grant interest on interest Thus' granting of interest ft1' l2nl' per annum on the accumulated interest' awarded by the relercnce Court is not tenabie in the eye of law' Hence' it is opinecl that the order of the reference Court to the extent of granting ir't':rest Ca) l2ok per annum on the accumulated interest from 17 O3.I 999 till the date be set aside, whi e confirming the of Pa1'ment' is liable to Point No. 1 is anssrered accordingly' remaining Part of the award t4 POINT O.2z N In view of the reasoned hnd'ing arrived ai Point No f it ts held that the order and decree of the referenct: Court needs to be modified only with regard to the payment of inlerest on interest' 23 AKS,I & ETD,I LAAS No.637 2007 I

15. POINT NO.3: In the result, the appeal is partly allowed setting aside the order and decree dated 22.08.2006 passed in O.p.No.3g5 of 2OO2 by the learned District Judge at Nizamabad to the extent of granting interest @ 12% per annum on the accumulated interest from 17.03.1999 till the date of payment, while confirming the remaining part of the award. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shalt stand closed. ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J Date:25.O4.2025 NS ! IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS NO: 7OS OF 2Oo7 Between: The Special Deputy Collector, LA Cum Loc. Unit, SRSp pochampad. AND APPELLANT/REFERENCER l Bheemarthi lMuthenna, s/o. pedda Gangaram, 69 years (died per LR at sr. No.71,72)

2. Smt. Chilka Laxmi, W/o pedda Gangaram, 30 years, 3. Chilka Nandipet Gangaram, S/o. Algari, 69 years 4. Chilka Venkat, S/o. Algari, 55 years, (died, per L.R. R B1) 5. Smt. Chilka Laxmi, W/o. Narsaiah, 40 years 6. Chilka Gangadhar, S/o. Narayana, 40 years, (died, per L.R. R g2) 7. Algari Chinna Venkati, S/o. Narsimloo, 50 years B. Bandari Malkanna, S/o. Muthenna, 62 years 9. Bandari Muthenna, S/o. Muthenna, 60 years l0.Bhimarthi Bhumanna, Slo. Narsimloo, 48 years (died, per L.Rs RR 83_84) 11. Smt. Bhimarthi Raju Bai, W/o. Naganna, 67 years (died, per LR R 85) 12. Bhimarthi Muthenna, S/o. Linganna, 65 years (died, per L.R. R. 86) 13.Smt. Bhimarthi Laxmi Bai, W/o. Linganna, 62 years (died. per L.R R. g7) '14. Bheemarthi Venkatram, S/o. pedda Bhumanna, 49 years l5.Bheemarthi Chinna Bhumanna, S/o. Venkanna, 70 years (died, per L.Rs RR 8B-8e)

16. Ponna Chinnaiah, S/o. Ponna Sayanna, 40 years 17. Smt. Bheemarthi Muthenna, D/o. Chinnaiah, 46 years 18.Smt. Mera Gangu Bai, W/o. pd.Chinnaiah, 78 years (died, per L.R. R_90) 'l9.Smt. Mera Lingu Bai, W/o. Chinna Chinnaiah,65 years

20. Gundla Pedda Gangaram, S/o. Yerrodu, 60 years (died per L.Rs RR 91-92) t 2l . Gundla Chinna Gangaram, S/o. Yerrodu, 54 years (diec, per L.Rs RR 93-g4) 22.Palle Devanna S/o. Ramulu, 52 years (died, LR at Sl Nc 73, 74)

23. Gundla Pochiga, S/o. Pochiga, 64 years (died, per L.R.s FLR 95-96)

24. Gangadhar, S/o. Padmashali lsthari, 48 years

25.Smt. Sambari Laxmi Bai, Wio. Linganna, 60 years (died, lrer L.Rs R-97) 26.Sambari Chinnaiah, S/o. Chinnaiah,60 years (died per _.Rs RR 98-99) 27. Smt. Naleshwar Chinnakka D/o. Venkanna, 65 yean; (died per LR at Sl. No.80

28. Naleshwar Chinnaiah, S/o. Venkanna, 50 years (died, p:r L.Rs RR 100-101)

29. Smt. Naleshwar Posani, W/o. Narsaiah, 65 years

30. Naleshwar Devu Bai, Wo. Narayana, 65 years 31 . Gundla Devanna, S/o. lv'lakanna @ Karrenna, 58 years (died, per L.Rs RR I 02-103)

32. Gundla Thonti Chinna Babuga, S/o. Chinna Babuga, 4l vears (died, per L.Rs RR 104-105)

33. Smt. Kustapuram Gangu, Wo. Gangaram, 58 years

34. Gundla Nadipi [Vuthenna, S/o. Pedda Babanna, 46 years 35.Gundla Pedda Pochanna( ), S/o. Babanna, 78 years (died, per LR at Sl. No.75) 36-Gundla Chinna Pochanna, S/o: Babanna, 69 years (diec, per LR R-106) 37 S4 Gundla Gangu Bai, W/o. Chinna Babanna,60 year:; (died, per L.Rs RR 107-108)

38. Yedla Pedda IVakkanna, S/o. Yedla Babanna, 69 years (died, per L.Rs RR109-1 1o)

39. Yedla Chinna l\,4uthenna, S/o. Malkanna, 40 years

40.Gundla Seethanna, S/o. Yedla Makkanna, 60 years 41 . Gundla Pochanna, S/o. Yedla Babanna, 62 years (died, p,:r LRs RR 111-112)

42. Smt. Gundla Padmavathi, D/o. Chinniga, 32 years

43.Gundla Makka, S/o. Chinna Makka, 57 years (died, per t..lts RR1 13-1j4)

44. Gundla Nadipi Gangaram, S/o. Chinna Makka, 62 years

45. Gundla Pedda Babanna, S/o. Babanna, 50 years (died, ire,r L.R R-1 i 5) 46. Chinna lV'luthenna, S/o. Babanna, 46 years

47.Gundla Chinna Babanna, S/o. Babanna, 42 yea$

48. Gundla Yella Bai, S/o. Yella Boi, 70 years, (died, per LR R 1 16)

49. Kethati Gangaram, S/o. Linganna, 56 years

50. Kethati Gangaram, S/o. Linganna, 50 years ) 5'l . Nakkala Devanna, S/o. Narsimloo, TT yea.]S (died, per L.Rs RR 117-118)

52. Nakkala Narsimloo, S/o. Chinnaiah, 71 years (died, per L.Rs RR 119-120)

53.Smt. Kurma Ravulamma, W/o. Kurma Gangaram, 68 years (died, per LR at Sl. No.76, 77)

54. Kurma Bhoomanna, S/o. Gangaram, 54 years

55. KUrma Muthenna, S/o. Gangaram, 49 years

56. Kurma Mallaiah, S/o. Rajamallu, 48 years

57. Nakkala Prashanth Kumar, S/o. Nakkala [\luthenna, 37 years

58.Nakkala Narsimloo, S/o. Chinnaiah, 71 years, (died per LRs RR 121-122)

59. Nakkala Devanna, S/o. Chinnaiah ,77 years

60. Pippera Sayanna, S/o. Muthenna, 69 years 6l.Pippera Narsa Reddy, S/o. Devanna,32 years

62. Pipperla Narsa Reddy, S/o. Devanna, 32 years

63. Palle Devanna(died), S/o. Ramuloo (LR at Sl. No. 78, 79)

64. Palle Chinnaiah, S/o. Chinnaiah, 52 years

65.Palle Hanumandloo, Sio. Damanna,62 years

66.Palem Narsa Reddy, S/o. Damanna,53 years

67. Pipperla Chityala Raja Reddy, S/o. Bhojanna, 69 years (died per L.R- R123)

68.Palem Bhoom Reddy, S/o. Gangaram,61 years

69. Pipperla Bhojanna, S/o. Bhojanna, 62 years

70. Smt. Nakkala Narsu Bai, D/o. Nakkala lVluthenna, 65 years 71 . Smt. Bheemarthi Gangu Bai, W/o. ft/uthenna, 68 years T2.Bheemarthi Gangadhar, S/o. Muthenna, 48 years (SL.No. 71 and 72 arc brought on record as per orders in lA No. 230812002, dt: 05.09.2002)

73. Smt. Palle Gangawa, W/o. Devanna, 65 years

74.Palle Srinu, S/o. Devanna, 26 years (SL.No. 73 and 74 are brought on record as perorders in lA No.230912002, dt:05.09.2002)

75.Gundla Pedda Muthanna, S/o. Pedda Pochanna, 45 years (Brought on record as per orders in lA No. 231012002, dt: 05.09.2002)

76. Kurma Muthenna, S/o. Gangaram, 54 years

77.Kurma Bhumanna, S/o. Gangaram, 57 years (SL.No. 76 and 77 are brought on record as per orders in lA No. 231112002, dt: 05.09.2002)

78.Smt. Palle Gangawa, W/o. Devanna, 65 years

79. Palle Srinu, S/o. Devanna, 26 years (SL.No. 78 and 79 are brought on record ) as per orders in lA No. 231212002, dt: 05.09.2002)

80.Smt. Naleshwar Devubai, Wo. Narayana, 59 years (Brougrt on record as per orders in lA No. 2998/2002, dt: 0910.2002)All R/o Badguna Viilage, Nandipet Mandal, Nizamabad District. 8'l .Chilka Chinnakka Wo Chilka Venkat Age.65 yrs Rl/o BaCl;una (V), Nandipet ([,'l), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R4)

82.Andhe Kalavathi W/o Gangadhar Age 50 Yrs Rt/o Badgura (V). Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R6)

83. Bhimarthi Rukumbai Wo Bhumanna Age 50 Yrs Rl/o BaJguna (V), Nandipet (lvl), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of Rl0)

84. Bhimarthi Srinivas S/o Bhumanna Age.35 Yrs R/o Badgurra (V) Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R10) 85 Bhimarthi lilgg!.nq S/o_Linganna Age.60 Yrs R/o Badgur-a (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R l 'l )

86. Bhimarthi Bhumanna S/o_ Muthenna Age 40 yrs R/o Badgruna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R12)

87. Bhimarthi Chinnaiah S/o_ Linganna Age.S0 Yrs R/o Bacguna (V), Nandipet (tvl), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R 13)

88. Bheemarthi Laxminarayana S/o Chinna Bhumaiah Age 40 yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (lr/). Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R1 5)

89. Bheemarthi Srinu S/o Chjnna Bhumanna Age.35 yrs tVo Badguna (V), Nandipet (lV), Nizamabad (Dist)

90.Mera Chinnubai D/o Chinnaiah Age.65 Yrs R/o Badguna iV), Nandipet (lM), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of Rl B) 91 .9undla Bingi Posani Wo Pedda Gangaram Age.70 yrt; Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R20) 92 9undla Bingi Babanna Q/g_ee.d!lGqlgaram Age.45 yrs R:/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (lt/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R20) 93 Bingi Posani Wo_Chinna Gangaram Age.70 Yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R21)

94.Bingi. G91-g-a-d.l9r S/g C!41a .Gangqlam Age.45 yrs FVo Badguna (V), Nandipet (lM), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of RZt; 95 Gu.ndla Bingi Ramulu .9lo ?qtjS-" Age.47 yrs Rl/o Bad3una (V), Nandipet (tt/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R23) (ft/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R23) - -

96.Gu.ndla Bing.i Bhumanna S/o Pochiga Age.44 yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet

97. Sambari Chinnaiah S/o Ling_anna Age.55 yrs Rl/o Badguna iV), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R25)

98.Sambari Ramdas S/o Chinnaiah Age.60 yrs Rt/o Badgunzr (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R26) l

99. Sambari Laxminarayana S/o Chinnaiah Age.50 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R26) ,

100. Remma Laxmi W/o Chinnaiah Age.60 Yrs Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R28) 101 . Remma Ravi Sio Chinnaiah Age.35 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (lV), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R28)

102. Gundla Bingi Lasumbai W/o Devanna Age.60 Yrs Rl/o. Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R31) '103. Gundla Bingi Babanna S/o Devanna Age 30 Yrs Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (lM), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R31 ) '104. Bingi Gangubai W/o Chinna Babuga Thonti Age.60 Yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R32) '105. Bingi Babanna S/o Chinna Babuga Thonti Age 35 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R32) '106. Bingi Babanna S/o Chinna Poshanna Age 45 Yrs Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R36) 1O7. Gundla Bingi Pedda Swami S/o Gangubai Age.40 Yrs R:/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (lvl), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R37)

108. Gundla Bingi Chinna Swami M/o Gangubai Age.35 Yrs Rl/o Badguna .109. Gundla Bingi Muthenna S/o Pedda Makkanna Age.50 Yrs R Ri/o (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R3B)

110. Gundla Bingi Babanna S/o Makkanna Age.4B Yrs F/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (l\/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R38)

111. Gundla GangubaiW/o Pochanna, Age B0 yrs, Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R41)

112. Gundla Chinna Gangu D/o Pochanna, Age 55 yrs, Fl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (N/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R41)

113. Bingi Poshani Wo Makka, Age 75 yrs, Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (l\r), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R43)

114. Bingi Babanna S/o Makkanna, Age 48 yrs, R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R43) '1 15. Gundla Bingi Lokam S/o Pedda Babanna Age.42 Yrs R:/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R45)

116. Tharu Bhojanna S/o Yellaboi Age.38 Yrs R/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (tt/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R48)

117. Nakala Prashant S/o lVluthenna Age.45 Yrs Rl/o Eadguna (V), Nandipet (M), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of 51 ) '1 18. Nakala Bhojawa W/o Narsa Reddy Age.55 Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet ([/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R51 ) 1 '19. Nakkala Ramreddy S/o Narsimioo Age.60 . Yrs Rl/o Badguna (V), Nandipet (tt/), Nizamabad (Dist) (LR of R52) I

120. Nakkala Narsa I Nandipeitil;:j!;5.:5offt$t*iliJ&?gi" Ase 55 Yrs IVo Badsuna (V), ! 121 . Nakkala Ram R rv, no i p.liiivri, I'r :#;;?t8,,i/?L #fl,-iffi !T A ge 60 Yrs PJo B ads u n a (V), rv, no i p"ir rr,rj, i.r ;; ;;;6,TiB1&i1r"#Xlli", Age 5 5 vrs rR/o B ad s u n a (V),

122. Nakkala Chinna 123 Chityata Raia Rer r.ra no i pei ti0rl,]\;;ilt"#fD:f ) ?i*fJhftf 'v, Age 60 vrs, Rr/o B a ds un a (V), ,..RESPONDENTS

1. I.) 10 RR 81 to

4.6,10,11 .12,13,15. per Court Order Dt- 3 are brought on record ilii#i,?yiffi gfl ,".f ,3i.bxi,_3:.lif ,,3?:%TB:.I* Appear fired under section 54 0f Land Acquisition Act against the order and Decree dated 22-08-2006 passed in op No. 351 0f 2002 0n the fire of the District Jucige at Nizamabad. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the judgment and Decree of the Lower court and the nrateriar papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Gp for Appeals, ibr the Appellant and Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, Advocate, appearing for the Respordents .1 , 2, 3, S, 7, 8, 9, 14, 16, 17, 15, 24, 2s, 30,33, 34, 39, 40, 42, 44, 46, 47, 4t),50, 54 to 57, 59 to 62, 64 to 66, 68 to g0, and none appearing for the Respon,lent Nos.8i to

123. l This Court doth Order and Decree as fo ows: I

1. That the appeal be and hereby is parfly allowed setting aside the order and decree dated 22.08.2006 passed in O.p.No. 351 of 2OO2 by the learned District Judge at Nizamabad to the extent of granting interest @ 12ok per annum on the accumurated interest from 17.03.1ggg ti, the date of payment, while confirming the remaining part of the award; and 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. A.V.S.S.C.S.M. S JOINT R A TRAR ECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The District Judge at Nizamabad 2. Two CD Copies G VLI HIGH COURT , DATED: 2910412025 DECREE LAAS.No.705 of 2007 PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS t t '{^ 6