✦ High Court of India · 29 Jan 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
29 Jan 2025
Length
1,247 words

Acts & Sections

Petition under Section '15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of execution- of the Judgment and Decree of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - Cum - I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, dL26.1O.2O17, made in tvlVOP No.538 of 2015, pending disposal of the above tU.A.C.lM.A No. /2018 Counsel for the Appellant : Sri N Vasudeva Reddy(SC FOR RTC) Counsel for the Respondents: _ _ _ Thd Court delivered the following: Judgment THE HON'BLE SMT. WSTICE M.G.PRTYADARSINI M.A.C.M.A .No .1085 of2Ol8 JIIDGMENT 1. Pursuant to the request made by the Corrnse,l appearing for both thr: p66i"", the matter was referred to .-ok Adatat. on 14.72.21,()24, the matter was settled before the Lok Adarat artd an Awirrd was passed by the Lok Adalat.

2. In view of the above, this Motor Accident Civil .Award Miscellaneorrs Appeal is disposed of in terms of the passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs. a J As a se.quel, miscellaneous applications, if arr.y, pending shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. N. RAJAGOPAL NT REGISTRAR S TA \ '1A Uecrroru oFFrcER \ 1 The chairman, h/rotor Accident craims Tribunar-cum- r Additionar chief ^ {rdg9 Citv Crv it Court,at Secunderabad(With records, it any r 2 The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Commrtte", High ,}ourt Buildings, 3. One CC to Sri tJ Vasudeva Reddy(SC FOR RTC) [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Hyderabad Along with a Copy of Lok Adalat Award. ADK v ; rr. -i i-.if":;?:r Y i s t ;*l HIGH COURT DATED:2910112025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.1085 of 2018 . in. Sl i-1 Q/: 2 / IllAii 2025 ((\(' z o 5 '..,,' '\{ * 'C\) DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF THE AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT WITHOUT COSTS W BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SEM/ICES COMMITTEE ron iTIT STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act' 1987 (Central Act)I Date:14-1 2.2:024 Present:1.Hqn'ble Justice G'Sri Devi' (Fonner Judge, Hon'ble High court Ior the Strte of Telangana) Chairman

2.5ri NaYakawadi Ramesh, Advocate' AL s€B G Member

3.Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate' Member HIGH COURT LOK ADAU\T =i * M.A.c. M.A.NO. 108 5 of 2018 (Before the Hon 'ble High Court) AGAINST c J * e olT (On the fite of I Additionat Chi ffi ##1'z.-3*? rri b unat- c um' ;il;;;, city civit court at secunderabad) Between: - The Tetangana State Road TransPort Corporation iprloi to oifrr."tion known as the Andhra Pradesh state iioud truntpott Corporation), Rep' by its, iiliionui Mi"ue"r, 6H Region, Personal Department' .lgi Picket, Secunderabad' AND 1 . Erramsheety SwaroPa Rani, W/o.E.Venkata Narsaiah, Ased about 50 years, Occ: Tailoring & Housenolo' i7"lH.N". ro-: 11, Tarnaka, secunderabad'

2. Shanker T, S/o. Chandraiah, -' un"i uUoit 55 years, occ: RTC Driver' n7o. r-90, Lasiherguda, Hayathnagar' --- ri"ne" n"day Distri;t, Hyderabad - 501 505' .....AoPe[lant/ResPondent No' 2 ln MVOP.No.538/2O15 ..., ResPondent/Petitioner .... ResPondenUResPondent No.1 in MVOP.No.538/201 5' Counset for APPettant / TGSRTC Counsel for Respondent/ Petitioner Representative of TSRTC : Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate : Sri P. Srinivas, Advocate : Sri R.Shiva Kumar, Law Officer This appeat having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties' the fottowing award is passed: Psn "r\- \ r AWARE mpensation Awarded Co by the Tribunat R s.5,68,000/- (Rupees Six takhs sixty-eight thousanra onty) with=' proportionate costs and interest at 7.5% per annunt frorn the date of petition titI deposit. ompensation Awarded The Corporation/TSR TC has preferred this Appeat aggrieved by the C (Setttement Reached) Award passed in MVop No.538 of 2015 by the Motor Accidenrs ctaims in the Lok Adatat, TribunaI cum-t Additionat Chief Judge, City Civit Court at Secunderabad. sri R.Shiva Kumar, the Law . Officer of TGSRT: and the Respondr:nt/ Petitioner atong with counsel has appeared before the Lok Adatat. I pendency of this Appeat, the Appet(ant/ IGSRTC and During the Respondent /Petitioner have entered into a settlemeni and in pursuance of the same, the Appettant/TGSRTC has agreed to reduce p_ncipq[ award amount f.om Rs. 6,6g,000/_ to Rs.6,02,000/- and interest from l.SX to 6% per annum from the date of petition titt the date of deposit and the Respondent /petitioner has agreed to receive the samer towards futl and final setitement. Accordingty, the compromise is recorded and the case is settted before the Lok Adatat for an amount of Rs.6,Oil,00O/- with reduced interest i.e., @ 6% per annum from the date of petition ti[[ the date of Ceposit. ln view of the above setttement, the Appettant/TGSRTC shau deposit the above sarC amount within (60) days from the date of receipt of copy of Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. The Certified Copy of Award shatt be made avaitabte to the petitjoner within (10) days trom today. ln the event of defautt or detay in making such deposit, the Respondent/petitioner is entitted to claim interest as awarded b'l the [ower court. aI i + ,on t ol fe = * Apportionment of Compensation , if any ,dditional Di rection(s): 1 2 3 The Appettant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat. rhe amount arready depositeo uv tnu icsriii;;; ;;fi;"ii b" given credit to. soon after deposit by the rGSRTC, the Respondent/petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amounl. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their runset have signed this award in our l)resence. In terms of the compromise 11;iy.6 at between the parties, this case stands sposed of. n \-68- -,,{:..,ry r k-\Ac-r.^n to S.r/e--rt -F ^r- . gX S,/c_-t-r Appetlant (s) Respondent (s) E,{rou-*5 a.^r$--t k-"; g r-{i se)t52- ) ,,,s#:"*; Counsel for the Appellant (s) Counsel for the Respon <ft, t1?o. nt (s) 7 l2\ra'E9o \* CHAIRTAAN P^n + MEMBER le-AEMEER M SER IGHH LOK n' of the C Slate o1 --l m tee) i l l I i , i I i i iJ j l )l ,j l ii- I i IFF Iwc l I I ?a ''--./ I l--/ 1 dA!) a< tnw(rl t ; '4st t0 -b4

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments