High Court · 2025

5. Mr.Kalyan Kumar, The Sub-lnspector of Police, Gadwal Town Police, Jugulamba Gadwal, Telangana.

6. P.Seshadri, S/o late P.Narsappa, Aged 62 years, Occ. Pensioner, R/o. H. No.3- 18-1 70, Pragathi Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad - 500 01 3. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ":; ; itt pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, by a. declaring the action of the respondent No.5 interfering in the private civil disputes betu,een the petitioners and respondent lrlo.6 with regarding to land to the extent of approximately Ac.1 8.1 5 guntas in survey Nos.730 and 733 situated in Gadwal Village and Mandal, Jogularrrba-Gadwal District on the behest of the unofficial respondent by threateninll the life and liberty of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutio nal and in violation of Articles 14, 10 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia J b. directing the official respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 not to interfere in the private civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6 with regarding to land to the extent of approximately Ac.18.15 guntas in survey Nos.730 and 733 situaled in Gadwal Village and Mandal, Jogulamba-Gadwal District on behest of the unofficial respondent, c. directing the,rfficial respondents more particularly respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners without following due process of law, d. directing the respondent No.2 to take action upon complaint dated 0710412025 in accordance with law following due pro,:edure. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition unde' Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Corrt may be pleased to direct the official -espondents more particularly respondents No.2 to 4 to preserve and produce close circuit television (CCTV) footage of the respondent No.3 Pollce Statiorr from 05-04-2025 to 07 -04-2025 be,fore this Honourable Court, pending disposal of this Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition unde' Section 151 CPC praying that in the r:ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co,rrt may be pleased to direct the official respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners by involving into the private civil disputes in between the petitioners and respondent No.6 on behest of the unofficial respondent' pending disposal of this Writ Petitlon. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI YEMMIGANUR SOMA SRINATH REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No'1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER l l t THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.1076 L of 2O25 ORDER Heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Government Ple ader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admis;sion stage.

2. Having rr:gard to the manner of disposal of the V/rit petition at the admission stagr and the nature of /s involved, this Cout is of the view that notice to lnofficial respondent Nos.5 and 6 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the respo ndents-authorities, in particular the Stf, respondent is interfering in c vil disputes at the behest of the 6th respondent and threatening the petitioners with his personal life and libr:rty, even though this Court had granted interim protection in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.9374 of 2020, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as hi(lhly iltegal and arbitrary.

4. The petitoners further contend that aggrieved by the aforesaid action of the 5r' respondent, they had approached th,: 2nd respondent authority and lodged a complaint on 07.04.2025 and in :;pite of the same 2 is not being acted upon and thus, seek a direction to the 2nd respondent to take action on the aforesaid complaint.

5. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.l to 4 would submit that the respondents- authorities are not interfering in any civil dispute nor assisting the 6th respondent in the present Writ Petition in respect of land dispute existing between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents.

6. Learned Government Pleader further submits that since the respondents-authorities are not interfering in the civil dispute, the petitioners cannot approach the 2nd respondent and submit representation dt.07.04.2025 for taking action against the 5th respondent without any basis and such action is only intended to prevent the 5th respondent from taking action against the petitioners if complained of. 7 . The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home is taken on record. B. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and also taking note of the fact that the respondents-authorities have now informed this Court of the said authorities not interfering in the civil dispute as well as with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners herein, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed -not 3 I interfere in the civil dispute in respect of land in Sy'Nos'1730 and 733 of Gadwal Village and Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District'

9. Further, i' any action is warranted to be initiated aqainst the petitioners, the respondents-authorities are hereby directed to take action strictly in accord;lnce with law'

10. Subject t,l above observation and direction' the' Writ Petition is disposed of. No'lrder as to costs'

11. tu'liscellanoous petitions, if any, pending in this rryrit petition shall stand closed. ,ITRUE COPY" '3[IJl+'ls'6f&"J / 'N SECTION OFFICER l I I To, +:ia"8:?["n 'l!:*I;'lo"lsL*Ti:lil:,"::;**:::',"-"4Jt,;ffi 2 rhe Deputv "::::::'H"* o,o*,, rown Po' House -"'-"" t of Police' Gadwal Town P< """ ^^,..,^r rown pori(:e, Jusuramba Gadwal' 4 The Sub-lnspector ,;;;;,".*.1'yy:il[:illTH1]Tlxl;1'li"i"#li'" . Ix3.:,3:r'h3f,'o' Telangana

7. Two CD Copies BSR LS HIGH COURT DATED:1 110412025 ORDER WP.No.I0761 of 2025 THE S14 6 ( ((\ ( > 2 a i ltnrnzr. ( \ * o Pn-{e+^t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ( $