High Court · 2025

5. Smt.tV. Anjamma, W/o Jaipal Goud, Ag 1 -490127 I l,Shankar Nagar, Nr.Royal S Hyderabad-28,Telangana State. ed 51 years, Occ Housewife, H.No.12- ea Hotel, Asifnagar, Humayun Nagar,

6. Smt. IVlalgani Suvarna, W/o lVlRamulu, Aged 46 years, Occ Housewife, H.No.1 -65, Malakpur Village, Chevella Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana State. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 J The State of Telangana, Rep By Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, R.R.District, Telangdna State. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Shamshabad, R.R Diskict, Telangana State.

4. The lnspector of Police, P,S Moinabad, Cyberabad, R. R District, Telangana State

5. L.Bikshapathi, S/o L.Komaraiah, Aged 65 years, Madhuara Nagar Colony, Block No.tu2 1, H.No.8-3-222lC I 1 I 5, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS ,rt-" Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVANDAIV1US, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the civil dispute and to compel the petitioners to cancel the sale deed which was executed in favor of A7 to 416 vide Registered Sale Deed Doc.No.1067/2017 dated 3-3-2017 on the file of . The Sub Registrar office, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District is illegal, arbitrary, u ncon stitutio nal contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the Sth respondent. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 39474 oF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the Sth respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI R.A.CHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.31708 oF 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief "...fo rssue an order, direction or a writ parTicularly ole in the nature Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4'n respondent in interfeing with the civil dispute and to compel the petitioners to cancel th-e sale deed which was executed in favor of A7 to A16 vide Registered Sale Deed Doc.No.l067/2017 dated 3-3-2017 on the file of ine Sub Registrar office, Chevella' Ranga Reddy District is illegat, arbitrary, unconstitutionat contrary to law and consequently diict the resfondents parTicularly 4th respondent not to interfere in the civit dispute between the petitioners and the 5'n respondent and to pass. .... "

2. Heard Mr.R.A.Chary, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 4.

3.1'Learnedcounselforthepetitionerssubmitsthatrespondent No.4 has been interfering in civil disputes concerning the petitioners and has insisted that they cancel the sale deed dated O3.O3.20lT.Aggrievedbysuchinterference,thepetitionershave filed this writ petition seeking appropriate directions to restrain the respondents/police authorities from meddling in their civil affairs.

3.2.HefurtherSubmitsthatthisCourt,byaninterimorderdated

18.Og.2017, had directed the respondents/police authorities not to interfere in the civil disputes of the petitioners, and that, pursuant 2 to the said order, the grievance of the petitioners has been 'r. effectively redressed. Accordingly, learned counsel prays that the interim order be made absolute and appropriate final directions be issued

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, based on the representation made by respondent No.S, a cflme was registered, and during the course of enquiry, the petitioners were summoned to record their statements. It is, however, submitted that the respondents/police authorities have not interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioners and private parties, nor have they insisted upon cancellation of the sale deed dated 03 O3.2O17. He contends that the police action was confined strictly to the investigation of the complaint in accordance with law and that no unlaMul interference occurred

5. I have perused the material placed on record.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by both parties, and in view of the interim order dated 18.O9.2017, whereby this Court had directed the respondents/police authorities not to interfere in the civil disputes of the petitioners, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioners has been substantially redressed. There is no J material placed before this Court to indicate any further interference by the police subseqUent to the said order.

7. ln these circumstances, this Court finds it just and appropriate to make the interim order dated 18.09.2017 absolute, thereby restraining the respondents/police authorities from interfering in any civil disputes relating to the petitioners or from compelling them to cancel the sale deed dated 03.03.2017.

8. Accordingly, the interim order dated 18.09.2017 is made absolute, and the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. JAYASREE AS ISTANT REGIST ECTION OFFICER To,

6. The Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secre Telangana. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad,. R.R.District, Telangdna State' t, Hyderabad, State of TheDeputyCommissionerofPolice,Shamshabad,RRDistrict'Telangana State. The lnspector of Police, P,S Moinabad' Cyberabad, R R District' Telangana State One CC to SRI R.A.CHARY, Advocate IOPUC] TwoCCstoGPFORHOME,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUTI

7. BSR GJP Two CD Copies {T HIGH COURT DATED:1511012025 ORDER WP.No.31708 of 2017 1ffEh-;.r.,. - u^+.:... Y ?'-ir f 'l llAR 2il2[ ]; ii 23 o t) ( * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ( CI) P,ltc rM 0k, 3\ Lt -b \\\