Vangala Pushpalatha W/o v. Niranian Reddv Age

Age 5l years, Occ: Employee H.No. 20. Rangaraju Srikanth S/o. R. Kishan Rao Age 42 years, Occ: Business H.No.4_l/22g, .4_lll4O/l4li2, I

21. K. Vasantha Wo. K. Ram Reddv Ag'e 47 years, Occ: House wife U.No. qlDZl|ZZA, 22. Kondakandla Harish Reddy S/o. K. Karunakar Reddv .A,ge 3l years, Occ: Employec H.No. 4_ l/225. 23. tlhoujarla Venkata Bhargav S/o. Gopal Reddy .{ge 25 years, Occ: Employee H.llo. q_t nZqjZZS,

24. Vinathi Lingala W/o. Ranganath Lingala Age 35 years, Occ: House wife H.No. 4-l/224.

25. Ilokkam Premlatha Wo. Rokkam Anantha Reddv ,\ge 42 years, Occ: House wife H.No. 4_I/222/Z;3.

26. K. Sandeep Reddy S/o. K. Ram Reddy r\ge 30 years, Occ: Employee H.No. 4_l/gg/g9/2,

27. V. Pavan Kumar S/o. V. Devi Reddy r\ge 40 years, Occ: employee H.No. 4_ l/ I 77.

28. Govindu Raviteja S/o. Govindu Narender Age 27 years, Occ: Employee H.No. 29. r\nugula Jyothi D/o. A. Linga Reddy .4_11242, Age 46 years, Occ: House wife H.No. 4_l/450,

30. Adi Narasimha Rao S/o. A. Narsimhulu Age 53 years, Occ: Business H .No. 4-1126g/269, All the above are R/o Sadasiva Heavens, peddaamberpet, Ranga Reddv districr- ...Petitioners AND 1 2 Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd, Rep., by its Divisional Engineer, Operation Circle, Ranga Reddy East Saroor Nagar, Telangana The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd Operation Circle Ranga Reddy East Saroomagar Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of [\4andamus, by declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the applications of the petitioners for granting connections to the houses of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14,1 9 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to grant Electricity connection to the petitioners for their respective houses lA NO: 1 OF 2018 I Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide for electricity connection to the petitioners houses pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. S.NAGESWARAREDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY SC FOR TGSPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANC'A WRIT PETITI ON No.9 386 0F 2018 ORD ER: Heard Sri S. Nageswara Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri N' Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2'

2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under: " ...to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the applications of the petitioners for granting connections to the houses of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 74, 79 and 21 of the Constitution of India and r:onsequently direct the respondents to grant Electricity connection to the petitioners for their respective houses and pass...". It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on

3. behalf of ihe petitioners that in view of the interim order \ I \ a l/I ) wP 9386 2018 dated 16.04.2018 passed in favour of the petitioners in I.A. No. 1 of 2018, no further orders are necessary.

4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 does not dispute the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.

5. Bringing the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners on record, the present writ petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSI TANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. S.NAGESWARAREDDY Advocate 2. One CC to SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY SC FOR TGSPDCL [OPUC] 3. Two CD CoPies PUC] KKS GJP W HIGH COURT DATED:24101t12025 ,1 ORDER WP.No.9386 of 2018 IRo( E,H s rh 16, o (-) I \ \r) O9 JUN zffi r) ,i\ .So41qr-rf--O CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @u b