1. Saka Nitinprakash v. The State of Telangana

Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF TELANGANA I-IMITED Counsel for the Respc,ndent No.8: SRI SRINIVASA RAO PACHWA, SC FOR GREATER HYDERABI\D MUNICIPAL CORPORATION The Court made the following: ORDER i t: i I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.1O7O 2 0F 20.25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed, under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "...to issue uit order or directiotl more pa.ttcularlA one in the nqture of WRIT OF MANDAMUS dilecting the responients 2 to Z to prouide electiciry ?:::*gl Supptg to Regi.strqtion HT75i47664 for categorA -HT 02, r,oai.- -Building in plot ?9 O9KVA, l,ength -O.O6KM connection to the Resid.ential No.129 East part, ddmeqsuing 4O0 Sq. yards and plot tio.12g/1, admeasuring lOO Sq. yards,.(total ad.rneasuring SO0 Sq. yarcls) tn Surueg Nos_l to 40, 282 to 368, 369 (p), 3ZO to 373, 374 eL 375 b 3A7, 395 to 4Oi, !!a:a59 to 459, S0S (p), 510 to 564, situated ai Opp. Shitpa Kata Vedika, 1M2! L,"ayyt Uppat Bhagath (V), Med.ch(1t-Matkaisii- DistAit, 7.5., bounded bA North: pLot No.132; South:40'Wide Road.; p;;t: ptot No.12B; West: ptot No.129 West Part. Without inststing upon occupancg certificate from the &h respondent bg larding fi@t the refr.sdr to prouirle eticticitu coniei:tion to the aboue referred premises i.s illegal and arbiirary and. pass . . ."'

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government pleader for Energr for respondent No.1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 7; and Sri Srinivasa Rao Fachwa, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, f ) for respondent No.8.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this Writ peiition is squarely covered by the order of this I ! I I I I i.i 2 PK,J -, p ta7o2 2025 Court in W.P.l'lr.603O of 2O2O' dated' 20 04'2020' and l equested this Court 10 l)irss similar order in the present Writ Petilion also' The same is n'rt seriously disputed by the learned Government pleader as $,cli ts lcarned Standing counsel for the resllonden ts' In rierv ol thc above submissions and foi the reasolLs alike in 5. the order ol lrhis Court in W'P'No 603 O of 2O2O ' dated 2C '04 2O2O' this Writ Petitjc t-r is disposed of directing the respondents to release the power suJrplv to the premises of the petitioners sub'iect to the ol' the terms and conditions and on furnishir-rg to produce the occupancy certificate from the undertakin g concerned I\4u rricipal Corporation within a prescribed period' and if no such occu lal.lcy certificate is produced within such period' it is open to the r:spondents to take appropriate action in compliance 'rccordance u,ith law Miscellzr reous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' There shall br: no order as to costs //rRUE coPY// SD/-K.AMMAJI DEPUry REGISTRAR ,\ .ecrrJhE?-rercen To, I 2

4. 5 6 7 8 o n Med ch a I Zo ne/ r G S P D c L' Ii?J,:'ff y"3j"fi ilili[L"{363ii'""::i:::,::::ntsecr€)tariat'rhestate T he Ch ai rm a ru no rt'r u nqg' tiU"di-t;tor Th e So uthern,Powe r [)isri bution comoanv of relangana 9t'iB iil'i'"i"o iis Corporate office at 64-50' Mint *f glUlUll*'ln:* "10",?33 ",,ti TilStiB3i"."dins Ensineer/ operation/ Habsisuda circle' Tft:tJfflfl"r, Engineer/operation/ Habsisuda Division' TGSP DC L' fil:"I3:,?fr", Divisionar Engineer/ operation/ uppar sub - D vision, TGSP Dc !.:'{':J,1?f,i=ter"-"r/^lE"o"t,rryfl Bg:r6'l;J33%33h,illl:'uouo The Commiss;ioner, The G L.B.Nagar Zcne. G s P DC L' -r @v l I Hyderabad [OUTI

9.- 9ne CC to Smt. Thakur Roo.pa Singh, Advocate tOpUCI 10 L*q CCs to Gp for Energy, High C6urt foi th; Stjr" oi iLhngana, at 1'1 . One CC to Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, SC for Southern power Distribution 12.one cc to sri srinivasa Rao pdchwa, 'sc for Greater Hyderabad Municipar 13.Two CD Copies Company of Telanqana LimitedfOpUCl Corporation[OPUC] TJ HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:0910412t025 ORDER WP.No.10702 o12025 i I \ H lj ?h 14: 11 APl] 2IE ((\( .a') DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COISTS \ \l