✦ High Court of India · 24 Apr 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Apr 2025

Court

High Court of India

Decided

24 Apr 2025

Bench

ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L A SENIOR CIVIL COURT SENIOR CIVIL

Length

53,556 words

Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Appeals LANO ACQUTSITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 131 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.201 1 passed in O.P.No.163 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between 1 . Bajana Balaswamy, S/o Kukkanna, aged 69 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Yellaswamy, S/o Balaswamy, aged 39 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District -.RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for tha Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 133 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0,3.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.'l 19 ot 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Harijan C;attaiah, S/o Chandraiah, aged 82 yrs-Since Died per LR Appeilant No.2

2. Harijan Chennamma, Wo Chandraiah, aged 59 yrs 3. Harijan Gattaiah, S/o Pedda Bakkanna, aged 64 yrs -(Appellant No.l _Died a! per LR Appellant No.2) All are Agricutture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Cla imants AND The Special l)eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... Res ponde nURes po n d net Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISNIION FIRST APPEAL NO: 136 oF 2025 Appeal fihd under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in o.P.No.16s of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. B. Bichamrna, Wo Swamulu, aged 74 yrs 2. B. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o Swamulu, aged 40 yrs

3. B. Krishnaiah, S/o Swamulu, aged 38 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 138 OF 2O2s Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.158 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Golla Venkatamma, Wo Shekhar, aged 59 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Krishna Murthy, S/o Shekhar, aged 38 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict

3. Chinna Keshavulu, S/o Shekhar, aged 36 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 139 OF 2O2s Appeal filed .under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.99 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Shankaramrna, Wo Naganna, aged 42 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Marrdal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 140 oF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0t1.o4.2o11 passed in o.P.No.112 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil .ludge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Sharakon,la{istanna, S/o Narsimha -Since Died per LR - Appellant No.2 to 6 Agriculturr.., R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparitiy Diskict. 2. S. Maddil,-.tti, S/o Kistanna, {O.eg.ea yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, 3. C. Kurum;aiah, S/o Kistanna,4gp ++ yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

4. C. Lalitha, D/o Kistanna,.. ASp. 4? yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

5. P. Sug.unamTq, .qlo Kistanna, Age 35 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarata Viilage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

6. C. Santharnfia, Dlo Kistan.na, Age 32 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair M;rndal, Wanaparthy District. (Appellant No.1 Died - as per LR Appellant No.2 to 6 (Appellant 2 already brought on record) ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Speci-al Dr:puty Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanerparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent - Counsel for the ltppellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Flespondents : GP for Appeals LAND ACOUISIT ONF IRST APPEAL NO: 141 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 +assed in O.P.No.152 of 2010 on the file of the Coud-of- the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Between: Tappeta Govindamma, Wo Shanthaiah, aged 35 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenURespondnet Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Appeats LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 146 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.139 ot 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: K. Narsimha, S/o Balaiah, aged 54 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At y Diskict. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUI!;ITION FIRST APPEAL N O:, 147 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated c'7.04.2011 passed in o.P.No.126 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Pedda Elalaiah, S/o Late- Yerra. Kommulaiah, aged 74 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagaralar Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diatrict

2. Naramma, D/o Pedda Balaiah, aged 59 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair lrtlandal, Wanaparthy District

3. Narsimha, S/o Pedda Balaiah, aged 49 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagardla Village Pebbair l/andal, Wanaparthy District

4. Ramachandraiah, S/o Pegda Balaiah , aged 44 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village P,:bbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disirict

5. Nagaraju,,Slg Pg!!a Balaiah, aged 36 yrs, Agricutture, R/o Nagarata Viilage Pebbair t\4andal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The.Special l)eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISI]]ON FIRST APPEAL NO: 148 OF 2025 Appeal fikrd under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggiieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in o.P.No.128 of 2o1o on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Bandi Ranl;anna, S/o Balaiah, aged 74 yrs 2. B. Bala Ra.u, S/o Ranganna, aged 39 yrs 3. B. Chandreiah, S/o Ranganna, aged 39 yrs All are Agriculture, Rl/o Nagarala Village pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants ANO The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Peb,bair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APP EAL NO: 151 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.402 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Sa Pe yamm?, Wo.Kistanna, Age 80 years, Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, bbairMandal, Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N. Praveen Reddy Counsel forthe Respondent: GP forAppeals LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 154 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.194 ot 2O1O on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

5. Govindla Sayamma, Wo. Gattaiah-died as per LRs-Appellants 2 to 6 G. Sudarshan, S/o. Gaftaiah, aged 45 years. G. Krishnaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 53 years. G. Swamulu, S/o. Gaftaiah, aged 55 years. M. Laxmidevdmma, D/o. Gattaiah, aged 59 years.

6. G. Nars mha, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 50 years. (Appellant-:l qlrg?g.y brought o_!. regord) (All art agriculture, R/o. Nagarata Viltage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District) ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Speciai Dy Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthl' District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: {59 oF 2025 Appeal f led under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated o;3.04.201'l passed in o.P.No.104 o'f 2o1o on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between B. Balamma Wo Kukkanna, lggq !9 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special l)eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals A lsl:rloN F T APPEAL 65 0F Appeal fik:d under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 03.2011 passed in O.P.No.131 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil J ldge at Wanaparthy. Between: Prathap Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, age 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. New N garala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At y Diskict. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Gounsel for the Respondents: GP for Appeals LAND ACOUISITI ON FIRST APPEAL NO 169 0F 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.135 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: 'l . B.Konda Reddy, S/o.Chinna Gatta Reddy, age 70 years Occ. Agricutture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. B.Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o.Konda Reddy, 42 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 174 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.O3.2011 passed in O.P.No.81 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

1. Smt. K. Laxmi Devamma, W/o. Hanmanthu Reddv, 78 vears. Occ- Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Winapartliy District. 2. K. Venkat Rama Reddy, S/o.Hanmanthu Reddy, age 52 years Occ- Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, W5naparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- phase- ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, W;rnaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for th e Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for thr: Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOU ISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 179 OF 2O25 Appeal frled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.042O11 passed in O.P.No.154 of 20'10 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil .Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: '1. G. Balasvuamy, S/o Balaiah, aged 69 yrs 2. Venkataswamy, S/o Balaswamy, aged 39 yrs All are A.<yriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District Appellants/Claimants AND The Special t)eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LANO ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 180 0F 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.201 'l passed in o.P.No.88 ol 2011on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judger at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Venkat Reddy, S/o.Papi Reddy, age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. V. Amarender Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, age 30 years Occ Agriculture, R/o. New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. 3 AND Agriculture, ...Appellants/Cla i mants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeats LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 181 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.1O7 of 2O1O on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between

1. Mukkapally chandraiah @ c.chandraiah, s/o.Laxmaiah, since died as per LR. Appellant-2

2. c. venkataiah, s/o. Mukkapally chandraiah @ c. chandraiah, aged about 56 Igarg. Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Cla imants AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals silTtoN O:1 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree datecl :,1.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.101 of.2011 onthefile of-the.Gour{-of. the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparlhy. Between: Golla swarrulu, s/o.Ashanna, agg 41.ye?rs, occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The^Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wa naparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the' Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 183 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 04.2011 passed in O.P.No.6B of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between

1. !mt. .Telul3u Balamma, wo. late Ramuru, age 70 years, occ. Agriculture, 2. ]glu.qu Poshanna, S/o.Late Ramulu, age 52 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Nlgarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, wanapartrry oistrict R/o.New Nrgarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wdnaparthy District AND ...Appellants/Claimants The.Speci.ql Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. . RespondenURespondent Counsel for the l\ppellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counset for the Flespondent : GP for Appeats Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated 0 8-0420 1."X-passedin€tP=N€+J-15-of 4&10-erthe{ile-of-the-Gour{-o the Senior Civil Judge at Warraparthy. Between:

1. Bathini Laxmaiah, S/o. Chinna Yellaiah, age 59 years. R/o Occl agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Ramudu, S/o Laxmaiah, Aged 37 years. R/o Occl agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND

1. The Special Dy.Collector., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair. Wanaparthy District.

2. Dastagiri, S/o. Laxmiah, aged 36 years, R/o. Nau,arala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District). (R-2 is not necessary party to this appeal) ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Appeals OF Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No. 153 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between M. Sayamma, Wo Yellaiah, age 84 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/C la irnants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair,WanaparthyDistrictl'... ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LANU ALiGIUIIA;I I IUN F.IKS I APPEAL NO: 1E7 OF 2025 Appeal l'iled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated31.03.2011passedinO.P.No.43 of 2011 onthefileof theCourtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Poy" [gT.?,'i Balaiah, s/o.Late veeraiah, age 15 years, occ. Agricurture, R/ o. Ngarala Ville,ge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/Gla ima nts AND The Special )eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Warraparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND FIRST APPEAL NO: 189 OF 2025 Appeal fi[:d under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31tO312011 passed in O.P.No.46 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Poy, Komari rirupataiah, s/o.Balaiah, age 46 years occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/C laimants AND The Special D=puty Collector, Rajiv Lift Irrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, wanerparthy District ..Respondenu Respondent Counsel for the l\ppellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Flespondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and tlre Serrior Civil Judge ai Warraparthy Between: Golla Krishnaiah, S/o. Kistanna, age 59 years occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/C laimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals T Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.53 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Golla Madugani Chilkamma,Wlo. Bichanna, Age 69 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUclaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISiITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 192 OF 2025 __-.- Appeal 'iled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and clecree datedSl=03-Zlff-passed in0.P.No.50 ot2011-.onJhe file-of{he€sur{of4h@----= Senior Civil Jucige at Wanaparthy. Between: Golla Shivudu, S/o.Kistanna , Village, Pebcair Mandal, Wanap age 62 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala arthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Pebbair, Wa Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Schenre-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At raparthy District ... RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the, Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISIIION FIRST APPEAL NO: 193 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 03.201'l passed in O.P.No .52 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Golla Gattaiah, s/o chinnaiah, age 76 years, occ, Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebb:rir Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/CIaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the flespondent : GP for Appeals : LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 194 OF 2025 -*--**" Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and ur#- -.in*O"p-Ns.46-ef the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Boya Komari l\rladdamma,Wlo. Narasimha, age 59 years Occ Agriculture R/o Nigarala Village Pebbair [/andal Wanarparthy District ...Appellants/C la imants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 200 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3110312011 passed in O.P.No. O.P.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Chakali Yerra Narsimha, S/o.Kistanna, age 74 years Occ. Agricutture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapafthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ' Respondenu Respondent counser for the Appeilant : sri. N praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUI{i|T|ON FIRST APPEAL NO: 201 OF 2025 Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and ---." *-.""*-* decree datedJt8,-Oa2g-1J-passedja-O-F-."Alo*146-ot-2&t0-on-the-file-sf"{he€eutr-of-.- the Senior Civii Judge at Wanaparthy. Between

1. Bathini f]alamasanna, S/o Karre Komaraiah -Since Died Per LR - Appellant No.2, 3 zrnd 4

2. B. Kurmanna, S/o Bala Mashanna, aged 39 yrs 3. B. trladdileti, S/o Bala fvlashanna, aged 36 yrs 4. B. Narsirnha, S/o Balamashanna, aged 28 yrs (Appellant No.1 Died - as per LR Appellant No.2 and 3 already brought on record) All are A1;riculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND ...Appellants/Claimants - The Special ,)eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Warraparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 204 OF 2025 Appeal filt>d under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 03.2011 passed in O.P.No.126 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil J -rdge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. K.Balaiah, S/o.Veeraiah, age 70 years, 2. K.Pedda [Vlahesh, S/o.Balaiah, age 34 years 3. K.Chinna l\4ahesh, S/o.Balaiah, age 32years 4. K.Shekhar, S/o.Balaiah, age 30 years, 4ll.a.re.Occ. Agriculture, R/o. New Ngarala Village, PebbairMa rdal.Wanaparthy District. ..Appel la nts/Clai ma nts AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District . :. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 205 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.124 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Lacha Goud, S/o.Buddanna Goud, Age 65 years, R/o. New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Parameshwar Goud, S/o.Lacha Goud, Age 33 years, R/o. New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. Narender Goud, S/o. Lacha Goud, Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Cla imants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No .B of 2011 on tlre file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Telugu Gattaiah, S/o.Nagaiah, age 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Collector Lift I Scheme-Phase-ll ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenUReipondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for thr: Respondents : GP for Appeals LAND ACOUI SITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 225 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated0-'?.04.2011 passedinO.P.No.l35of 2010 onthefileof theCourtof the Senior Civil ,Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. K.Ayyanna, S/o.Yellaiah age 79 years 2. Rangamnra, D/o.K.Ayyanna, age 3g years All Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparth.y District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 227 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.1)6.2011 passed in O.P.No.144 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: B.shekhal. Reddy, s/o.Krishna Reddy, Age 49 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Villager, Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District. ...Appelianuclaimant ,,] ,.,: j AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbai r, WanaparthY- District. ... RespondenURespon dent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri- N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FTRST APPEAL NO: 228 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.25 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: ;' Gunti Govindu, S/o. Chandraiah, age 55 years Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Vi Ilage, Pebbair [Vlandal,Wanapa rthy District. ...APPellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, WanaparthY District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counset for the Appellant : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 230 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.06.2011 passed in O.P.No. 143 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between B. Narayanamma, Wo.Krishna Reddy,Agg 8'l.V_e.aJs, All Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND Pebbair, Wilnaparthy District. ";srirn.pir.ii="e,.ip;,'*a,,'uo ;;; :ffiil;;,,"",*.'o, - ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. N praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:231 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0')-.06.2011 passed in o.P.No . 141 of 2o11on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. B.Chinadraiah, S/o.Bichanna, age 7g years 2. Narsimha, S/o.Chandraiah, age 3g years 3. Swamy, $/o.Chandraiah, age 36 years 4. Balaiah, [i/o.Kommulaiah, age 79 years All Occ. A.griculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairtMandal,Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The.Speciql Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, War aparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACQUtStT'l ONFIRST APPEAL NO: 244 oF 2025 Appeal file,d under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and file of the Court of dgcree dated 03. 13.2010 passed in o.P.No . 416 of 2009 on the the Senior Civil Jtrdge at Wanaparthy. Between: Suthari Buchanna,,, g/9 .gryplnq, aged .90_years, OCc. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, pebbair Mandal, Wanipartf,V Oi'.iri"t AND The S Collector Ra Lift lrri n Scheme Phase- ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 255 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No . 454 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Cheerla Venkataswamy, S/o. Laxmanna, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAN D ACOU lSlTlON FIRST APPEAL NO: 257 OF 2025 Appeal fited under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.377 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Munakar, S/o. Laxmanna, aged 80 years, Occ. Agriculture, Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District R/o. Nagarala ...AppellantlC laimant AND The speci"t Py 9pllector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, / phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthrr District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeats LAND ACQUIS ITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 260 0F 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No. 427 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Muraleriah, S/o.,Kondanna, ?.geq.4o.years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebtrair Mandal, Wanapariliy Distrilt. AND ...AppellanUClaimant .The special t]y c.ollector, Rajeev Lift rrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy ,)istrict ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals D FIRST L NO: 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No. 398 of 200g on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between A-Vishnu 9?g.?r,_ s/o. chandramouli, :g9g sg years, occ Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District AND ...AppellanUGlaimant The Special DY.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy ...RespondenU Respondent LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 263 OF 2A25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No. 435 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy Between: G.Sundaraiah, S/o. Kondanna, aged 60 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOU ISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 264 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.397 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Between A. Ashok, s/o. chandramouli, aged 50 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The special Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal liled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.42O of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at V/anaparthy. Between: Suthari Krishnaiah, s/o. Buchanna, aged 60 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Viliage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special l)y. collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .. RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACO .TION FIRST APPEAL NO :267 OF 2025 Appeal filt>d under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.394 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Jrldge at Wanaparthy. Between: G.Kurumurthy, S/o. Man Nagarala Village, Pebbair yam .Kond_a, aged 53 years, Occ. Agricutture, R/o. Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND ..::. .The speciat P:l.9.ofector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy D strict ..ReipondenU neiponOent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravuta Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Fiespondent : Gp for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Between Mohan Babu, S/o. Venkaswamy, aged 43 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCtaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 270 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.446 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparlhy. Between Gunti Shiva Kumar, S/o. G.Muralaiah, aged 40 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...Respohden'U Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISiITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 271 OF 2025 Appeal ''iled under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and .. - * deeree dated 03 03 ^o1O lrassedjn".of .No396-of-20@*on-thejilc-of,the-Ger*d-of*- - the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: A.Chandranrouli, S/o. Ayyanna, aged_70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebirair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOU FIRST APPEAL NO:272 OF 2025 Appeal fift-'d under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03 03.2010 passed in O.P.No.393 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Manyarnkonda, s/o. Narayana, aged 73 years, occ. Agriculiure, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanap-rthy Disirict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. .. RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the ltppellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Flespondent: Gp for Appeals APPEAL NO: 274 OF Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03,20tr0 passed-ip-O..P,Ne.A55-ef-2009 en the file ef the Geurt ef - the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Nagaraju, S/o. Venkaswamy, Aged 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 275 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.424 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Krishnaiah, S/o. Savari, aged 60 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparth District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District ...RespondenU RsipondCnt Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOUISiITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 276 OF 2o2s Appeal liled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Sharfuddin, S/o. Kaleel Ahmed, aged 65 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarata Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ... Appella nUC la imant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the, Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOU ITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 28'f OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.440 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G.Ramesh, S/o. G. Village, Pebbair Ma SgtVq11a, aged 4Q years, Occ- Agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala ndal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy D istrict ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the r\ppellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals .. ...:.--r^-.. -..."::.:,.- .----;;:--- ".-::::,1-:;::::H:..- .-1..:..:.;.;::;.:1--" -:.....1..........--.. ,...,...-. LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 282 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and ,r^^.eo .{a+oC 03.03.2010 passed in O.P,No, 112 ef 2009 en the-file ef the Geurt eF the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Kaleel Ahmed, S/o. Sharfuddin, ageci 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distr"ict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 284 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.383 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Krishnaiah, S/o. Chinna Buchanna, Aged 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUllilTlON FIRST APPEAL NO: 285 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Shiva Krishrra, s/o v,e1[aswamy ?ge!.40. years, occ Agriculture, R/o.'Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapartny Oistriit. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. ... RespondenU Respondent Counsel for ther Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeats LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 288 oF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.425 of 2009 on the file of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Gunti Muralaiah, _S/o. K_ondanna, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy district. , aged 5s years, occ- Agriculture, R/o. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The specirt Py .collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase- ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ReCpondenU Respondent Counsel for the l\ppellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Flespondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 289 OF 2A25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and ,,j:-:.:r'-a::'j,*$*'':llJ:::;:j:j::xsg;3;:;:'.i{.*x#31:.:':j*::::j:f-:;:-1'1:trj;'5;:;;:j:";l*-:il;;;-:"';:' the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Between: Gunti Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. Muralaiah, aged 40 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation,Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District., ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 290 oF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.462 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: V. Shekhar Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy aged 7_Q years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair MandAl, Wanaparthy District ..APPellanU'Claimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector District. , Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, "r" R6spondenURespondeiit" Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counse| for the,,ResP9.1dent i GP.,fo1 Appeals LA D UI T L Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Between G.satyanna, s/o. Koncranna, ageg 7^Q v9ars, occ. Agricurture, R/o. Nagarara Village, PebbairfVlandal, Wanapirtfry Oisirici.-' --- ' AND ...AppellanUClaimant .The speciat Qy cgltector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-lt, pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the, Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACQUISI IION FIRST APPEAL 295 0F 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.401 of 200g on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Gopal, S/o- venkalqiah, Aggd !p.years, occ. Agricurture, R/o. Nagarara Village, Pebb:lir Mandal, Wanapathy Distiict. AND ...AppellanUClaimant The Specirt ?y coilector, Rajeev Lift rrrigation scheme, phase-il, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...R6spondenU Respondent Counsel for the l\ppellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Flespondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 296 OF 2025 : Jffi ;H *::':'ff:,1,,ff ,:ffffiT:;: il k:'ff :1 , "-" "Tff the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Mahadev, S/o. Gopanna, aged 50 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, V'anaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 375 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.464 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: V. Bhagavanth Reeddy, S/o.Ram Reddy, 67 Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy D years, istrict. Occ. Agriculture, R/o. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUI:SITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 383 OF 2025 Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and -deeroedatedJ)3.,O3r01.0+a the Senior CivirJudge at Wanaparthy. Between: "ot - - v. Vinobha Reddy, s/o Rgm Reddy,_{O years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND .The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, 7 Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 422 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.465 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil . udge at Wanaparthy. Between V. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o.Ram Reddy, p5.years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The special Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-lt, pebbair, Wanaparthy Ctistrict. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the r\ppellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Gounsel for the llespondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 425 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Between: V. Rameshwar Reddy, S/o. Shekar Reddy, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 433 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.83 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. C.Subhashini, Wo C.Jagadeeshwar Reddy, aged 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Laxmi Devamma, Wo Late Sai Reddy (Since died LR Appellant No. 3) Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 3. Prameelamma, Wo Dharma Reddy, aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUllilTlON FIRST APPEAL NO: 435 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and - --.d€ €#e€dated€1-03'20"{-1 paseed-i - Senior Civil Jurlge at Wanaparthy. Between er---**"* V.Rameshwar Reddy, s.lq Dharma Reddy, aged about s6 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the, Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND SIIION FIRST APPEAL NO : 436 OF 2O2s Appeat filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2O11 passed in O.P.No.89 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Madhusudharr Reddy, s/o Dharma Reddy, aged about s0 years, occ- Agriculture, R,/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase- ll, pebbair, District. ...ReiponUenfl neCponOant Counsel for the l\ppellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Flespondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 437 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and - deeree dated-08'84*01{ passed in 8:l-:Ne:167 ef 2010 sn{he f'le-sf the Goutrof-- the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. K.Ch.Balaiah, S/o.Buchanna, age 84 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair [Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. K.Kurmaiah, S/o.ChinnaBalaiah, age 49 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District ..Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 438 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.201 1 passed in O.P.No.92 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Dharma Reddy, S/o Ram Chandra Reddy, aged about 79 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy, Collecto r', Rajeev Lift I rrigation Scheme;.,Phase=lJ ;,Pebbai r, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals P.T.O LAND ACQUISiITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 440 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and deere+dated€ t . O3*O+a-passeC-in&P:No€3-oF2044-on tl re-file oI H rm Senior Civil Juclge at Wanaparthy. Between: Village, F)ebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

1. M. venkataiah., 9/o 9gyqnna, age 49. ye.ars, occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala 2. .V.gng"ql?, W9lVall"g!,- age 44 yealq, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarata Village, F,ebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. -

3. Laxmi, VV/o ch-qndrayu9-u, age 34 Jgar.s, occ- Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala village, F'ebbair [Vlandal, wanaparthy District. ...Appellahts/clairiants AND The.Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Warraparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the R-espondent : GP for Appeals The Court delivr-'red the following: Common Judgment E HON'I]LE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND THE HON,I}LE SMT. IUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA 139 L.A.A.S. Nos.27. 32.33.35 . 38. 39. 42. 49, sL.52.54.55. 67.69.74.75.76.77.78,79.8s,90.96, 99. 700.702.'103. ao6.107.'109.11,5.117.'L 18.1,20.121..1 1 s8.62. 105. 126.1.27,1.31..1 33. "136. 179 1.69 1 180,18L . "182.183. 184, 185 .'1,87.789,'t 90.19"t ,'192,193, 194,200. 26A,262, 201.,204. 205.223. 225, 227, 228, 230,231, 244,255, 263.264.265 ,267 . 268, 270, 277, 272.274, 275,276, 281,.282. 284, 422.425. 433.435. 436. 285.288. 28e.290. 294, 29s.296.375. L47 L 1 1 1

1. 438 D 440 0F COMMON IUDGMEN'|: (l'cr I lon'lrle Sri Justice Alrhinnnci Kunrar Shavili) Since thc issue int,olved in all these appeals is one ancl thc same, all t'hese aL)peals are being heard and disposed of by wav of this courmorr j Lrc{ plnte tlt.

2. Heard Sri V. Ivlanohar Rao, Sri N. Praveen Reddy and Sri Ravula Sharnkar Redciy, learned counsel for the appellants- claimants and the learned Covernment Pleader for Appeals appearitlg for the r:espotrt{ent. -J.. Learnecl cour,rsel for the appe_llants ha{ conte-4-de_,{ tha[ the lands along n,ith str:uctures belonging to the appellants were acquired by the Government for the purpose of irrigation projects. I-earrie'dcouusel furtlrer corrtended tl'rat tlre State Government lrars 2 AKS,J & ETD,J I-.A.A.S.No.27 of 202't & batch issued C;.O. Ir4s.N 0.234, c{atec{ 1 5.10. 1993, ordering enhancernerlt of cornpelrs;trtiorr lrv tn,o nl()re times (l+2) tharn tlre rralue fixed bv thc [.anc{ Accluisition ()l'i-iccr I'or trccluisiLiorr o[ the house sites ancl sLlucturc,s [or Srisarilanr l)r'ojt:ct, and ;r I)ivision lJench of this Cclurt in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 has taken a decision that the said G.O. trpplics Lo alI otlrcr irriqatiorr projccts also auci accordirrgly, allcrvvcd i-.;\.A.S.No.4 of 2016 zrirft' juclutnet-tt, dtrtecl 75.09.2022, enlrancinli thc rrrarl<ct vatlut: by tn,o lrlore tin'res (l+2) than the value fixcd by the [,anc{ Accluisition Officer vvith all consequential berrefits as stipulateci under tlte amended Land Acquisition Act.

4. I-earnecl counsel for the aprprellants htrd further contended that follorvinfi the saicl judgrnent, tiated 75.09.2022, the very same Division llenr:h has disposed of I-.A.A.S.No.'125 of 2A75 and batch, uida cornnron judgment, datec{ 27.09.2022. Aggrieve.l by the said comnlon judgrnent, clated 27.09.2022, t['re State has carried the nratter lo the Honourarble Supreme Court by filing S.L.P.(Civ l).No.28925 of 2024 and the same was dismissed by the I-Iorrourable Supreme Court uide order, dated 17.09.2024, -1 AKS,J & ETD,J L.A.A.S.No.27 of 2o25 & b.rtch f'crllowinl; the judqnrertt, clatetl 15.09.2022, renderc-d Irl t-.A.A.5.No.4 of 20-16 atrrl itlso tlre comnlon judgrnent, clatecl

27.09.2022, i'etrderecl in L.A.A.S.No.725 of 2015 ancl batch, ttre present app-reals also cicscrtzer to Lre disposec{ of by enhancing the rnarkeL rralur: Lry tr,r,o nrorc) tirnes (l+2) than the rralue fixed by the Land z\cquisitiou Offict:r r,r'itlr alI consequerrtial benefits as stipulatecl under the anrt'nclecl l.and Acquisition Act.

5. Further, learned counsel for the appellants had fair|y conceded that tl'rc appeals arc filed r,vitl-r delay of nearly 4000 to 5000 days, as admitteclly, the appellants are poor farmers and illiterates, and therefore, interest may be denied for the delay period irr preferring tl're zr1-rpeals.

6. Learned Government Pleac{er appearing for the respondent did not dispute the same. 7 In the present cases, the lands were acquired for the purPose of Rangasamudratn Balancing Reservoir. Admittedly, except for 4 AI{S,J & I'TD,J L.r\.A.S.No.27 of 2025 & batch ,\ tlrc clcla.i, thc rest of the issues irt tl're preserlt appe.rls ar-c squarely r:ot,erccl Lrv t[re jLrc{gment, c{atec{ 15.09.2022, rcnclereri irr L.,\.,\.S.,\o.1 trl: 2016 arrci also Ilrc (]onllltolt jrrtlrlnrttrrt, clatt:d

27.09.2022, t'ettcicrer{ in L.A.A.S.No.l25 of 2015 turri b.rttrll, vvhich \,\/i-ls (olrltirnrt:cl by t['re Ijorrourablc Supreme Court rririr: orcler', c-{atcr1 17.09.?024, in S.l-.t'].(Civii).No.28925 of 2024. Thcr:cfore, this C6r_rrt is 9f the vier,r, that all tfue ap'rpc.tls czilt Lre clisp-rosccl of ir-r tcrnrs o[ ,-ht:.rl'oresaic{ juclgments, dater{ 75.0c).2022 trurl 27.09.2022, Lr_1' enharrcinl; the market value by two lnore tirnes (1+2) than the value fixe d by the Lancl Acquisiticn Officer tt. r\ccordirrgly, all the appreals arc disposed of in tcrms of the jtrcll;rrrerrt, r{ateci 75.09.2022, renclerecl try this Court in L.i\.r\.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the cornmon juclgnrent, datecl

27.09.2A22, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.No..|.25 of 2015 anct batch, trv enhancing tlre rnarket value by tr.r,o lnore tirnes (l+2) than the valuc fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer: rn,ith all startutory bcnefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act. However, it is made clear that the appeilants are l I I I 5 AKS,J & EI'D,J L.A.A.S.No.27 of 2025 & barch noL entitit:ti to interest for tl-re delay period in preferring tire aPPCals. N{iscclletncous .\prplicatioirs, i[,rrtr., [)('nrliug, in tlrese aprprs6[5 shal[ -stanc{ closccl. 'l'herc shalI be ncl orcle r.ls to costs //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGIS SECTION OFFICER The Senior Civil Judge at Wanapar-thy. (With One CC to Sri. V fi/lanohar Rao, Advocate [O One CC to Sri. N Praveen Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] One CC to Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] Two ccs to GP for Appeals, High court for the state of relangana. [oUT] Two CD Copies PUCI any) To, 1 2 3 4 5 6. LD W HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 s 21 llN 2U25 o (.J t t COMMON JUDI3MENT 136 148 192 169 437 APPEALS ARE DISPOSED OF a r yD ')A I \ THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI aI{ID THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSIM of 2016 COMMON WDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi) ' This appeal is preferred by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet (hereinafter referred to as "the reference Court") in L.A.O.P.No.47 of 2012, dated 19.03.2013. By the impugned order, the reference Court has awarded the market value for the houses/structures of the claimants one time more (1+1) than what was awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer in Award No.34 of 2OL 1, dated 10.11 .2011.

2. The houses and structures of the claimants situated in Anugonda Village, were acquired by the Government for the purpose of submergence under Priyadarshini Joorala Project, by issuing draft notification under Section a (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") on O9.O9-2OO9. After due enqufy, the Land a Acquisition Officer has passed an award on 10.11.2OL1 fixing compensation for houses, structures and open places on the basis of prevailing rates as on the date of notification relying upon the valuation fixed by the requisition authorit5r, frdglltin Department. The claimants having received the compensation under protest, sought for reference to the civil Court under Section 18 of the Act, seeking i.. t 2 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 enhancement of compensation. By the impugned order, the reference Courthttsenhancedthemarketvalueonetimemore(1+1)thanwhat wasawardedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer.Seekingfurther gnhancementofcompensation,theclaimantspreferredthepresent appeal. .3. Hr:ard the learned counsel for the appellants/claimants and Sri D.Kiran,learnedAssistantGovernmentPleaderforAppeals.Perused the matt:rial available on record'

4. Ttre main contention of the learned counsel for the claimants is thatevenundertheGovernmentOrdersi'e''G'O'Ms'No'234'dated 15.10.1!)93, marked as Ex'A6, the Government has passed orders granting compensation 1+2 times for the houseslstmctures acquired inrespectofSrisailamProject.Itissubmittedthatinasmuchasthe presentacquisitionofthehouses/structuresoftheclaimantsalsofor the purpose of irrigation project i.e., Priyadarshini .,borala Project, Ex.A6 is equally applies to the case of the'claimants and therefore, the learned counsel seeks to enhance the market value of the compenrlation 1+2 times than what was awarded by the L'A'O'

5. The Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals would submit thattht:G.o.coveredbyEx.A6wasissuedinrespectofSrisailam projectlrnd.whereasthepresentacquisitionpertainstoPriyadarshini -i' -Y 3 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 Joorala Project, for which no specific G.O. was issued by the Government and therefore, Ex.A6 cannot be taken into consideration. He further submits that as seen from Ex.Al, the reference Court, in respect of earlier acquisition in O.P.No.611 of 7999, has enhanced the market value by one time more than the value fixed by the L.A.O. As seen from Ex.A2, this Court in A.S.No.3375 of 20OO has confirmed the market value fixed in Ex.Al. Even the Apex Court, as seen from Ex.A3, has dismissed the appeal confirming the fixation of the said market value by the reference Court. Therefore, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals, relying on Ex.A3, submits that the market value fixed by the reference Court is based on evidence and needs no interference by this Court. 6- A perusal of the record discloses that in respect of the earlier acquisition proceedings pertaining to Gaddampally H/o. Anugonda Village, the reference Court has passed orders in O.P.{o.29 of 2OO4 I and Batch, dated 23.O1 .2006 enhancing the market value by one time more than the value fixed by the L.A.O. The said order was marked as Ex.A10. Inasmuch as the present acquisition proceedings relates to the adjacent village covered by Ex.A1O, the refet'ence,pourt relying on -t Ex.AlO has fixed the market value by one time more than the value fixed by the L.A.O. The record further discloses that the Government has issued orders on 15.10. lgg3, which was marked as Ex.A6, 4 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 !- \-- \ ordering for enhancement of compensation two times more (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O., in respect of the acquisition of stmctures that were acquired for the purpose of Srisailam Project. Although the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that this project is entirely different one and the said G.O. covered by Ex.A6 which was issued for Srisailam project cannot be applied in the absence of any specific G.O. issued for the present project, this Court is not inclined to accept the said contention for the reason that the present acquisition proceedings also pertains to lrrigation purpose. Even the other contention of the learned Assistant Government Pleader that under Ex.A3, l:he Apex Court has confirmed the earlier fixation of market value b1'reference Court by one more time (1+1) than the one fixed by the L.A.O. and therefore, the present enhancement made by the reference Court which is in tune with Ex.A3 cannot be disturbed is also unsustainable for the reason that Ex.A6 issued by the Governnrent grantin g 1+2 has not been brought to ttlt notice of the Apex Court.

7. It is relevant to refer clause (ii) of Ex.A6, which specifies t}:at"the market value of the structures including well which hqs been treated. as "{ structure. .bg tlrc Land Acquisition Officer in his award; and house sites shall be fixed at three times the uqlue (1+2) determined bg the Land Aquisiht.on Officers." Even though Ex.A6 pertains to the acquisition ,I Itil! ii, ii, I. :i 1: Itr !ii 5 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 proceedings in respect of srisailam Project, the benefit thereof cannot be denied to the present appellants on the mere ground that the present proceedings pertaining to a different project. After all, both the acqrrisition proceedings are for the purpose of irrigation projects' Therefore, basing on Ex.A6, this court is inclined to enhance the market value by two more times than the value fixed by the L-A.O. In the result, the appeal is allowed enhancing the market value 8. by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act' There shall be no order as to costs' pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. L5.A9.2022 gkv/tsr JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI WSTICE M.G. PEIYADARSINI .ir :.1' THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DIVI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSINI L.A.A.S.Nos.125. 144.27O and 356 of 2O15.62 and 68 of 2021 COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi) The lrs in this batch of Appeals preferred by the claimants pertain to common acquisition proceedings and therefore, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Heard learned counsel for the claimants and Sri D.Kiran, learned, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent. Perused the material available on record.

3. The present acquisition was for the purpose of submergence of Priyadarshini Joorala Project/ancillary projects under Priyadarshini Joorala Project. This Court uidejudfrnent, dated L5.O9.2O22 has already elaborately analysed the evidence and considered the identical issue raised in these appeals in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2OL6. Both the counsel have not disputed the factum of commonality of the evidence and the issue in these appeals and in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2A16, wherein this Court has allowed the appeal enhancing the market value by two more -t 2 I times ('..+21 than the value fixed by the L.A.o. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act.

4. Therefore, following the judgment passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 0f 2016, dated 75.09.2022 and for the reasons stated therein, all these appeals stand disposed of by enhancing the market value of the acquired land by two more times ll+21 than thr: value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI JUSTICE M.G. PRTYAI'ARSINI I

27.O9.20'.22 gkv/tsr Note: Oflice to append a copy of the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 with the present judgment. - B/o gkv/tsr .l-t' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOU PRESENT LE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 27 OF 2025 Between Golla Bakkanna, S/o Gattaiah, age 73 yrs Occ- Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal' wanaparthy District' ...Appetants/craimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.201 1 passed in O.P. No. 20 ol 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 oI 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4965 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That then-' shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EGISTRAR IIi s OFFICER To, 'l . The Senror Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD l)opies ..:::: - r s.,*i&tii,,::t. j::i:4: 1' I HIGH COURT DATE D : 24 10412025 DECREE LAAS.No.27 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DIS|DOSED OF \ \ \0 !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACoUISITIO N FIRST APPEAL NO: 32 OF 2025 Between: '1. Yakoob, S/o Papanna - since Died per LRs - Appellants 6 to 8 2. Anjanamma, Wo Gattaiah - since Died per LRs - Appellant I 3. Rangaswamy, S/o Gattaiah, aged 51 yrs 4. Kurumurthy, S/o Yakoob- since Died per LRs - Appellants '10 5. Laxmikala, D/o Kurumurthy, aged 33 yrs 6. Rangaswamy, S/o Gattaiah, Grand-son of Yakoob, aged 40 yrs 7. Laxmikala, D/o Late Kurumurthy, Grand-daughter of Yakoob, aged 30 Yrs 8. K. Venkatamma, Wo Kurumurthy, Daughter-inJaw of Yakoob, aged 50 yrs 9. Rangaswamy, S/o Gattaiah, Son of Anjanamma, aged 43 yrs 10. K. Venkatamma, Wo Kurumurthy, aged 50 yrs Appellants 6 to 8 are LRs of deceased AppellanUclaimant No.1 - Yakoob Abbellant I is LR of deceased AppellanUclaimant N9-.2 - Anjanamma Appellant 10 is LR of deceased AppellanUClaimant No.4 - Kurumurthy. All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimats AND The Special Deputy Collector, Raliv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act' aggrieved by the Qrder and decree dated 02.06.20'11 passed in o.P. No. 20 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court dottr Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 renderec in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2O1S and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by lhe Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under tho amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4909 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be noorderasto costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGIS ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, 2. Two CD C:opies anY) W .--,j:.:.-",.-.::-.:-;+::-tffiTij-_-___ffi 4" HIGH COURT DATED: 24 l04l2tl25 DECREE LAAS.No.32 ot il025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF J 1\) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA . LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 33 OF 2025 Between:

1. Yemula Shaker, S/o Ramaswamy, age 61 yrs 2. V. Suresh, S/o Shakar, age 36 yrs 3. V. Rajesh, S/o Shakar, age 34 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 39 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That apprellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4963 days in preferrin,J the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR D c ION OFFICER To, '1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD Oopies W

1. : ; : ,,: ,j: .! HIGH COURT DATED:24l$4l2tl25 DECREE LAAS.No.33 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HoNouRABLE t*, ,,I&53E[L,,*AND KUMAR sHAVrLr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQU ITION FIRST APPEAL N 3s oF 2025 Between: Kurmurthy, S/o Uppari Appanna, aged 51 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/C Iai mants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 37 of 2A11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.AS No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4963 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR ON OFFICER To,

1. The Senir>r Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD ()opies W , :1:i4ffiff'ri. :.r.r'.' . : -":t'rr " :: f-' :-. - l't j{ HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No.3S of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF { q7 \s IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HdNOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRS APPEAL NO: 38 OF 2025 Between: Mala Chandramma, Wo Chinnaiah Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy aged 75 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Peb.bair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.06.2011 passed in O.P. No. 147 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent.. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value I l : : ! ' i 1 : : l i i i i : fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appeltants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5027 days in preferring the appeals. i: 1 _t '.4 r'/ '-7 ,,

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DE TION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD ()opies w -'ffiffi .. i.: r': . ''*:::, t- HIGH COURT DATED:24l0412tt25 DECREE LAAS.No.38 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 v \ \)) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:39 OF 2025 Between: Chandraiah, S/o Uppari Appanna, Aged 64 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Distrtct. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.06.2011 passed in O.P. No. 147 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09,2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2O15 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4973 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR TION OFFICER To,

1. The Seni,tr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if a 2. Two CD rlopies W HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 39 ol'2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1o IN THE FIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 42 OF 2025 Between G. Jothi, Wo Swamulu, aged 50 yrs, Occ Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... Res pondenURes pondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 195 of 2010 on thefile of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4974 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That the re shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYI SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGTSTRAR S OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD Copies W , :jmP..,i, HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No.42 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSEO OF 0n^1 \7 Lil L0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACoulstTtoN FlRs T APPEAL NO: 49 OF 2025 Between:

1. Chakali Narasimha, S/o Gattaiah - since Died as per LRs - Appellants-2 and 3 2. Niranjan, S/o late Chakali Narasimha, age 50 yrs, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

3. Kasemma, Wo Chakali Narasimha, age 65 yrs, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Proposed Appellants No. 2 & 3/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' At y District. ..,RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.201 1 passed in o.P. No. 15 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('t+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory beneffts as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That app,ellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4900 days in preferrinlT the aPPeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD Copies W r' HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No.49 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 4 \q \t I I I t ! 1 , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE . PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION APPEAL NO: 51 OF 2025 Between 1 2 Bijja Ramadevi, Wo Eshwaraiah, aged 53 yrs. Megya Laxmi, D/o Eshwaraiah, aged 58 yrs. All are Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Peb'bair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P. No. 6 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4900 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That the'e shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYI/ SD/- DE . ISMAIL ISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With record.s, if any) 2. Two CD Copies N, {..,.'i_": '.' :, ,r.,4i:j +j /\''r :it_ , j ,:-.,r-:,:1:.la ,. },i, , .,..-.. !* ,:' . .i' { HIGH COURT DATED:24104121125 DECREE LAAS.No. 51 ol 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 10 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ITION FIRST APPEAL 52 0F 2025 Between

1. Mandapuram Sailu, S/o M. Kistaiah, age 73 yrs, 2. Radha Krishnaiah, S/o Sailu, age 36 yrs 3. Shivamma, D/o Sailu, aged 43 yrs 4. Yellamma, W/o Late Ramulu, aged 53 yrs 5. Anjanamma, Wo Yella Swamy, aged 33 yrs 6. Shirisha, D/o Mallaiah, aged 33 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P. No. 21 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the: appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 1 25 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That thr: appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4900 days in preferrirrg the appeals.

5. That therre shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR S OFFICER To,

1. The Sen:or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD Copies ,. 6 HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 52 ol'2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE rHE HoNouRABLE r*, ,&*r53EX"r,*oND KUMAR sHAVrLr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 54 OF 2025 Between: Govindla Bhagyamma, Wo Krishnaiah, aged 54 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/Ctaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 196 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 20'16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act ___i,y To, 4' That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4g61 days in 5. That therre shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPYII SD/. ISMAIL S OFFICER

1. The Senicr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD rSopies N. *."' I HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 54 ol'2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1/> \0 \ ? IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 55 OF 2025 Between:

1. G. Balaswamy, S/o Late Bakkanna, since Died per LR Appellant No.2 to 4 2. G. Venkataiah, S/o Balaswamy, aged 44 yrs 3. G. Bakkamma, D/o Balaswamy, aged 48 yrs 4. G. Sankaramma, D/o Balaswamy, aged 42 yrs Appellant No.2 already brought on record . All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 145 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer 1- That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1S.O1.2O2Z rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2O1S and batch 2- That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That th,= appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4966 days in 5. That therre shall be no order as to costs. under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior civil Judge at wanaparthy. (with records, if any) 2. Two CD Copies 4$, MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS OFFICER j ; I i I I i l I I ,! :li:i.:.-" '*fs** --:-l::-;:. a t" ,l HIGH COURT DATED:24104121 25 DECREE LAAS.No.SS of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ( \r) 1t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 56 OF 2025 Between

1. Komari Sayamma (DIED), Wo K. Gopal - Died as per LRs Appellant No.2 already on record and proposed Appellant No.3 2. K. Pramodh Kumar, S/o K. Gopal, aged 38 yrs 3. Komari Nandini, D/o late Gopal, aged 26 yrs. All are Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair lvlandal,Wanaparthy District ...Appel lants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011passed in O.P. No. 188 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .O9.2A22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That th,: appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4961 days in preferrirrg the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. . ISMAIL //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD Copies ANY ?.I:!tffi . i r 'i t HIGH COURT DATED:24lO4l2t)25 DECREE LAAS.No. 56 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF I, / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE.HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D Between:

1. Boya Pedda Narsimhulu, S/o Karrenna, aged 64 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair [\Iandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Boya Venkataiah, S/o Pedda Narsimha, aged 46 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. Boya Ravi, S/o Pedda Narsimhulu, aged 34 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claima nts AND The Special Deputy Collector. Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 147 ol 2O10on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed b,l the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That tl're appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That aglpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4966 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ON OFFICER To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CD Copies W .1 t'il' -' l': l' HIGH COURT DATED:241O412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 58 ol'2025 APPEAL IS DIS.POSED OF ( \/ \, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQTIISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:62 OF 2025 Between: Boya Bakkamma, Dlo Balaswarny, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanapafthy District. : ...Appel lants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 .04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 193 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 at 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4951 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY tsT OFFICER To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CEr Copies <? HIGH COURT DATED:24l,0#2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 62 otl 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF \ \? 1O IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Vemula Ramulu, S/o. Ngarala Village, Pebba Rangaiah, Age 72 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New irltlandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 400 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2\ than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5362 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ SD/. DE D. ISMAIL OFFICER To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With records, if any) 2. Two CEr Copies w i- t ,1 i : :, ; ,i : HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 67 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF ( INTHEHIGHcoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THEHoNoURABLESMTJUSTICETIRUMALADEVIEADA RS Between: Ranoaswamv, S/o.Kistanna , Age 63 years, Occ' Agriculture, R/o'New Ngarala Vili;6;, Peb5air Mandal,Wanaparthy District' ...AppellanUClaimants AND The special Deputy collecto.r, Rajiv Lift lrrigation schenre-Phase--ll' Pebbair' At Pebbdir, WanaParthY District ...RespondenU ResPondent Appeal filed under section 54 o',t the L.A-Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P. No. 403 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grbunds of appeal, the Judgment ancl Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. N. Praveen Reddy' Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment o:i:9 15'og'2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.og.2022renderedinL.A.A.S'No.125of2015andbatch 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That tf'" appeifants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5362 days in under the amended Land Acquisition Act fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer preferring the aPPeals'

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYI/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DE OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies /^rry HIGH COURT DATED:24l$4l2tt25 DECREE LAAS.No. 69 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF "vl, \\ a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 74 OF 2025 Between:

1. C. Chinna Narsimha, S/o Karrenna, aged 54 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair lvlandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. C. Pedda Narsimha, Slo Karrenna, aged 62 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

3. C. Nagaraju, S/o Pedda Narsimha, aged 43 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

4. C. Karrenna, S/o, Narsaiah -since Died per LRs - Appellants/Claimants 1 and 2 already on record, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appel lants/C laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 127 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 renderr:d in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2'.022 rendered in L.A.A.S No. 1 25 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2\ than the value fixed brr the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That aSrpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4953 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That th=re shall be no order as to costs SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REG CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Ser ior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies M HIGH COURT DATED:24l,0#2:,025 DECREE LAAS.No. 74 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 10 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 75 OF 2025 Between: G. Shivaiah, S/o Gattaiah, aged 59 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appella nts/C tai mants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... Res pondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 146 of 2O10 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed cf in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4947 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That thr:re shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy, 2. Two CD Copies M SD/. MOHD. ISMATL ISTRAR DEPUTY SEC OFFICER ::,:('::. ': HIGH COURT DATED:2410412'025 DECREE LAAS.No. 75 of 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF 1 \D \7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL , TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HoNouRABLE sru JfSrSSE[Lr'*oND KUMAR sHAVrLr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 76 OF 2025 Between: K. Padmamma, Wo Kurmaiah, aged 39 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Coliector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 .04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 131 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory berrefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act a.: --tJ-:-::=.--.-: 7 : J[?#'ffll,T:'o|:'J]:t 5. That thr:re shall'be no order as to costs entitred to interest ror the deray period 4e53 days in //TRUE COPYII s MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy To, 1 2 Two CD Copies ,lg .1. & d HIGH COURT DATED:2410411tO25 DECREE LAAS.No. 76 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 t0 Yv I I I I i i 1 , : . IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND TI'IE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between:

1. C. Nagamma, Wo Shanthaiah, aged 64 yrs, /o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. C Kurumurthy, S/o Shanthaiah, aged 39 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair [\Iandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appel lants/Clai mants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...R'espondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 .O4.2O11 passed in O.P. No. 1 32 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at W'anaparthy. This appeal cbming on for hearing and upon perusing the giounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer ; iiiiJli:.:'#""l'?nts.sharr 4 rr,"t "0";#Jxi3 s fl",',"fi[:t,ln".iT"Til..,.;i Hi:ffflT'.5'",;,#:;;".eray be enrined^to ail statutory benerfts as stipurated perio d 4s'ldays in "o"t. //TRUE COPYII To, 1 . The Senior- Civil .ft rr{rra 6+ r^r^_ _ z. rwo cD W "oo,jl"dse at wanaParthY SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REG ISTRAR OFFICER t a" HIGH COURT DATED:24104/,1'-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 77 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 4 "u> \q I I I I I I I ; I ! i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 78 OF 2025 Between:

1. C. Nagamma, Wo Shanthaiah, aged 64 yrs, /o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanapa rthy District.

2. C Kurumurthy, S/o Shanthaiah, aged 39 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Schenre-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 125 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP FOR APPEALS for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 1 25 of 2015 and batch fixed b1,the Land Acquisition Officer 2' That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4' That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4953 days in 5. That therre shall be no order as to costs. under tlre amended Land Acquisition Act preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REG OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senirlr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies ,t,, '.'i|* '*'u'tut" -i"' i. HIGH COURT DATED:24104/2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 78 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \c \? IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HoNouRABLE sR' JfaRr:3EIL",*AND KUMAR sHAVrLr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D Between K. Buddaiah, S/o Gattaiah, aged 64 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appel lants/C Iaima nts AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... Res pondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated 07.04.2011 passed inO.P. No. 138of 20l0onthefileof theCourtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act 4' That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4961 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferrirrg the appeals. /TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senir>r Civil Juclge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Oopies hrt,v/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS OFFICER "ta,'i'.,4 ?1"'',"tt' i6:r t.: f .{ HIGH COURT DATED:241041it025 DECREE LAAS.No. 79 ol'2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \o \7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 85 OF 202 5 Between: A. Krishnaiah, S/o. Ranganna , Age 72 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RESPONDENTS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.354 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon pei'using the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ol 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5291 days in preferring the appeals. ,,/-

5. That thr-.re shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies tN., SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY EGISTRAR SE TI OFFICER ,.,3t$sf -' r,.i. -.!; HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 85 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \ LP \7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THEHoNoURABLESMTJUSTICETIRUMALADEVIEADA Between: Gunti Bichanna, s/o. Manumanthu, Age 85 yeals, occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarata Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District' ...Appel lanUCla i mants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, WanaParthY District. -.ResPondenU ResPondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.314 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy- This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09-2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. !rio. a of 2016 and the common iudgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 1 25 0f 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5359 days in preferring the aPPeals. ^7

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEP SE N OFFICER Itr@,.,Ir'-.,,: #i.:: i* ".:'*-. '' ,': -tln - ;"-r r ..:1" ','" ,. .:.'*q-, a_. -- ,t_ f HIGH COURT DATED:24 10412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 90 ol'2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \ \2' qO IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 96 OF 2025 Between: Gunti Bichanna, S/o. Manumanthu, Age 85 Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy years, District. Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.406 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming.on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act '- i- ;+: "' .'r 1g/ ,// /

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5367 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That thare shall be no order as to costs. SD'- ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies w t,:' !q..i_ .---fllffi:::r.1:i !, i.'' *,.-:..r.:i . ..i ir-{*!sF:rvi:."',*: . .:";ai: .: i ,.1. ;:.- , J' HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 96 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \D IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 99 OF 2025 Between:

1. K. Narasimha, S/o Gattaiah, aged 69 yrs 2. Mahender, S/o K. Narsimha, aged 42 yrs 3. Gattaiah, S/o K. Narsimha, aged 41 yrs All are Agriculture, Rio Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appel Iants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No. 123 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Oider and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer "'l," To, 3' That the appeflants shafl entifled to ail statutory benefits as stipurated _ under lhe amended Land Acquisition Act 4 That apperants are not entired to interest for the deray period 4g67 days in 5. That thare shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. -be //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL REGISTRAR DE S N OFFICER

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W .4"'--.- i I HIGH COURT DATED:24l,04l,,2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 99 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF 1 tD \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 100 OF 2025 Between:

1. G. Ravelamma, Wo Bakkaraiah, aged 59 yrs 2. G. Narsimha, S/o Bakkanna, aged 40 yrs All are Agriculture, Rio Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/G laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P No. 102 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated IS.OS.ZOZZ rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed b'/ the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That ttre appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4967 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// S MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ON OFFICER To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W :, -'^:r'r:i ;;FT ' ",i ,\ I HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 10O t>f 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF I \? 1D IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA , LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 102 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 15'l of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Tappeta Ramulu, S/o Balaiah, aged 59 yrs 2. Krishnamma, D/o. Ramulu, aged 39 years, All are Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District: ..Appel lants/G laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenU Respondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer ,J / ,//? -

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4972 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That tl'rere shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ON OFFICER /TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies w t.. f d HIGH COURT DATED:24104l,,2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 102 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISIPOSED OF \ fi tD IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S}IAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 103 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 148 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between 1 2 3 4 Telugu Pentaiah, S/o Balaiah, aged 69 yrs Raju, S/o Pentaiah, age 44 yrs Kurmaiah, S/o Pentaiah, aged 36 yrs Chennamma, D/o Pentaiah, aged 39 yrs Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbai r Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 'l . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 arrd batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under':he amended Land Acquisition Act 3' That tlre appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4' That alcpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4gT2 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferr ng the appeals. To, /TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies v s$;i ,' 't' f HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 103,rf 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \7 \o \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIT , TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 104 OF 2025 Between: Gollavala Narasimha, S/o Gattaiah, aged 59 yrs, Occ agriculture R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair mandal Wanaparthy District. ...Appetlants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At y District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 162 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon, hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2') than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4967 days in preferring the appeals. I To,

5. That there shall be no order as to costs I/TRUE COPY// I SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR ON OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W T I./ HIGH COURT DATED:24104l,t-O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 104 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF ( (D 1f \? IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI - AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 105 OF 2025 Between: 1 2 3 Jetti Sithamma, Wo Buchanna, aged 69 yrs Jetti Rajender, S/o Buchanna, aged 44 yrs Jetti Bhasker, S/o Buchanna, aged 39 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair. Wanaparthy District. ...RESPONDENTS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011passed in O.P. No. 164 ol 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under the amended Land Acquisition Act 3 That the apperrants shafl be entifled to alt statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That appellants are not entifled to interest for the delay period 4967 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DE CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, '1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies 1,. 4y . :tif: ." ;--:' . ,,t., ,. "' r*.! :i;j,W{S:?. ,r . ..sr, l. , ; F HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 105 of 2025 APPEAL IS DIS POSED OF \ \2( \$ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AC UISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: '106 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P. No. 12 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Telugu Ramudu (DIED), S/o. Balaiah since died as per LR-Appellant No.3 2. Telugu Narsimha, S/o. Late Ramudu, age 34 years. 3. Telugu Balamma, Wo. Late Ramudu, aged 62 years. (already on record as Appellant No.2) (All are agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District). ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme. Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 164 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer 1 ' That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmen t dated 1s.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the- common judgment dated 27.09.,2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch 2 That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That the apperrants shafl be entifled to a[ statutory benefits as stipurated 4. That alrpellants are not entifled to interest for the deray period 4965 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. under lhe amended Land Acquisition Act preferrrng the appeals. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ryv' SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL TY RE ECTION OFFICER t 4 6 HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 106 of 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF 1 \7I t0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rH E Ho N o u RA B L E s R r r,iSr53E XL, r NAN D KU M AR s H AV r L r AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA , APPEALNO: {07 OF Between:

1. Mallamma, Wo Utharaiah, aged 79 yrs 2. Srisailam S/o Utharaiah, aged 36 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 157 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravtlla Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 'I . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer :; under the amended Land Acquisition Act 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4' That erppellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 496Z days in 5. That ttrere shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies w ,,, .i"i{,. i ttffi;'- i'1: ?.9

1. HIGH COURT' DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 1O7 ol2A25 APPEAL IS DIS]POSED OF I I i : : : : l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FUE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 109 OF 2025 Between B. Bhagvanth Reddy, S/o.Bheema Reddy, Age 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. New N g arala Vi I lage, Pebba i rMa nda l,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At y District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 534 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. irt Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5361 days in preferring the appeals. 7

5. That tl'rere shall be no order as to costs. - To, //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ON OFFICER

1. The Serrior Civil Juclge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies 4' .e I.IIGH COURT DATED:24l$4lit02i DECREE LAAS.No. 109 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF I \T tD IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITIoN FIRST APPEAL No; 115 oF 2O2s Between: Sharakonda Ramudu, S/o Shanthaiah, aged 39 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O8.O4.2O11passed in O.P.No.1 14 o't 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanapa(hy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 20'16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. Ihal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That aopellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4973 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAI TYR D CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 'L The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2 Two CD Copies A\,,U/ .r,+i1jr#rffitr(!j:rYi+::+4.;j:r: .,,. ., *, HIGH COURT DATED:24l$4l1r-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 115,rf 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 4 \ \d 10 tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FI RST APPEAL NO: 117 OF 2025 Between: Sharakonda Ramudu, S/o Shanthaiah, aged 39 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/C laima nts AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Schenre-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.O4.2O1 lpassed in O.P.No.'169 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgrnent dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to lntei'est for the delay period 4973 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C[t C6O;". t.- A;^., l)/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL GISTRAR DEPU sEc N OFFICER ., ,'i:9fi;te#iF*st:.1+ii=- 1*' I ,''" - d' HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 117 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DIIiPOSED OF 1 \7 rC lb IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HoNo,RABLE sRr r,iSr:3EILTTNAND KUMAR sHAvrLr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AC QUISITION FIRSTAPPEALNO:118 OF2025 Between: Sharakonda Ramudu, S/o Shanthaiah, aged 39 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict ...Appellants/Claimants AND The special Deputy collector, Raiiv Lift !rrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, WanaparthY District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.108 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. Ravula shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: .1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09:2022 rendered iri r-.n.n.s. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A A.S. No. 1 25 of 201 5 and batch

2. Thalthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4973 days in Preferring the aPPerals'

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To, 'l The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CE' Copies #/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SE ON OFFICER : 'r '.g::t*liir!}" -- .-a i'. 'r HIGH COURT DATED:24104t2O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 118 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISJPOSED OF 14 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ANO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITIO N FIRST APPEAL NO: 120 OF 2025 Between: Sharakonda Ramudu, S/o Shanthaiah, aged 39 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair' At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.171 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4973 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL GISTRAR DEPUTY SECTI OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:2410412O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 120 ot 202s APPEAL IS DIS,POSED OF \ 'l x\ q0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEALNO:121 OF2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.20'11 passed in O.P.No.159 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between Boya Villag Utharaiah, S/o Buchanna, aged 64 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala e Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Glaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.201 1 passed ln O.P.No.159 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. Thal the lvlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed b'y the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That tre appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4972 days in prefering the appeals.

5. That ttrere shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Ny o ''rtE#-r- . _:tt.;,.: (. I / HIGH COURT DATED:2410411r-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 121 ot 2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \oo IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHIN.AND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 125 OF 2025 Between:

1. Narasimha, S/o Jakkaralah, aged 63 yrs 2. Suvarna, D/o Narsimha, aged 36 yrs 3. Yellamma, wo Late Jakkaraiah-Since Died Per LRs - Appellant No.1 and 2 (Appellants 1 and 2 already brought on record) Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/C lai mants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.98 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in ter:ms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That aSrpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4972 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That thr:re shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DE EGIS S N OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 'I . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies ry) / a HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 125 ot 2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 126 OF 2025 Between: Golla Kurmaiah, S/o Late Bojjanna, aged 59 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.172 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4978 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Ny SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGIST RAR SE OFFICER .r,4. ,f ., , : 't 'I*ij rliiWdt', sl : -::j.::;{l)r }* r' HIGH COURT DATE D : 24 104i2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 126 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF LD 1? IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA , LAND ACOUIS ITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 127 0F 2025 Between:

1. Govindamma, Wo Late Papanna, aged 64 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Buchanna, S/o Papanna, aged 32 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.201'l passed in O.P.No.172 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 'l . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmenl daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act t 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. J[?f:ff1'tr:'r::"rP entitled to interest ror the detav period 4e7B davs in //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two CD 3opies 4v SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGI D \s OFFICER .i ,.,r, ,,, .,',i'._,:li-wffi#!-.' 'i.t 1' :::i:i

1.. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412A25 DECREE LAAS.No. 127 ,cf 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 if,\ \/ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: '131 OF 2025 Between:

1. Bajana Balaswamy, S/o Kukkanna, aged 69 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Yellaswamy, S/o Balaswamy, aged 39 yrs Occ Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Ra.iiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.163 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 20't6 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 o1 2015 and batch 2' Thatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That alpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4g02 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR D N OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanapa(hy 2. Two CD Copies v ' ..,'+;j _. :a. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412'.OZS DECREE LAAS.No. 131 c,f 2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF Lp IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD E URTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND A.ND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA i LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 133 OF 2025 Between:

1. Harijan Gattaiah, Sio Chandraialr, aged 82 yrs-Since Died Per LR Appellant No.2

2. Harijan Chennanrrna, W/o Chandraiah, aged 59 yrs 3. Harijan Gattaiah, S/o Pedda Bakkanna, aged 64 yrs (Appellant No.1 Died as per LR Appellant No.2) All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbarr lMandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appel lants/C laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.119 of 2O1O on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S- No. 125 of 2A15 and batch i.::,-,'':. 2 3 4 That the lMarket varlie is enhanced by turc rnore times (.1+2) than the varue fixed by the Larrd Acqirisition Officer That the appellants shall be entifled to all cr:rrtn^r L unde'the arnenJeo iano Acquisition'a'fl =" statlltcrv* benefits as stipulated That appellants are lot entitled to interest for ihe clr:iay period 4g02 clays in pi-efe -ring the appeals That :here shall be nc order as to costs //TRUE COPYII To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2 Tr,.io C[) Copies 4\j - - MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTR TION OFFICER '#:" . rlii'"{;rr i:ir'{iY&mmi t7', ,' , -i\B:,:- - . '! HIGH COURT DATED:241*412G2s DECREE LAAS.No. 133 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ( )) ,\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 136 OF 2O2s Between:

1. B. Bichamma, W/o Swamulu, aged 74 yrs 2. B. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o Swamulu, aged 40 yrs 3. B. Krishnaiah, S/o Swamulu, aged 38 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.165 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That irppellants are not entifled to interest for the deray period 4902 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two Ct) Copies i- 4h,, SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR S ION OFFICER : 1:i:I:'?i}i*rlitr : ""' HIGH COURT DATED:241O4t2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 136 of 2025 APPEAL IS DITiPOSED OF qO $ 12' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FlvE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 138 OF 2025 Between:

1. Golla Venkatamma, Wo Shekhar, aged 59 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Krishna Murthy, S/o Shekhar, aged 38 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

3. Chinna Keshavulu, S/o Shekhar, aged 36 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Raliv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.158 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That:rppellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4g67 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. under the amended Land Acquisition Act prefering the appeals. s - MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGIS E TION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 'L The Serior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two Ct) Copies 4f, '- " -{-.1-_.a'i-:-_ 'ii. ','1" t::. ' .i , !. / T HIGH COURT DATED:24lO412O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 138 of 2025 APPEAL IS DI:SPOSED OF { \7 \a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 139 OF 2025 Between: Shankaramma,.Wo Naganna, aged 42 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.99 ot 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4978 days in preferring the appeals. ) SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEPU SE N OFFICER

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, 'l . The Sr:nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. fwo Cr) Copies A.1/ lt, HIGH COURT DATED:241O4i2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 139 of 2025 APPEAL IS DTSJPOSED OF 1 \v 1o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITI ON FIRST APPEAL NO: 140 OF 2025 Between 1 . Sharakonda Kistanna, S/o Narsimha -Since Died Per LR - Appellant No.2 to 6 Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. S. Maddiletti, Slo Kistanna, Aged 38 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. C. Kurumaiah, S/o Kistanna, Age 44 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

4. C. Lalitha, D/o Kistanna, Age 42 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

5. P. Sugunamma, D/o Kistanna, Age 35 yrs., Agriculture; R/o Nagarala Vlllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

6. C. Santhamma, D/o Kistanna, Age 32 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. (Appellant No.1 Died - as per LR Appellant No.2 to 6 (Appellant 2 already brought on record) ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Dishict. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.201 1 passed in O.P.No.112 ot 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court dc,th Order and Decree as follows: { fixed L,y the Land Acquisition Officer 1' That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.s. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 1 2s of 2o1s and batch 2' That tire tMarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the vatue 3' That tre appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4' That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4gTgdays in 5. That there shalt be no order as to costs. under the amended Land Acquisition Act preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY R ECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W - -'+r' '...'*:rjffiF*!.r' i-';l r! i. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 14(t ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF rl) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO | 14'.t OF 2025 Between: Tappeta Govindamma, W/o Shanthaiah, aged 35 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.152 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the.judgment dated 15.O9.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4978 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to coqts. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR s OFFICER To, 1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C[) Copies 4y " :fP&,:.i . .: : .t HIGH COURT DATED:24l04t2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 141 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF u( f,o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO| 146oF 2025 Between: K. Narsimha, S/o Balaiah, aged 54 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ,..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.139 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 o1 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4972 days in preferring the appeals. --.,.v To,

5. That ihere shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DE TY REGI S N CFFICER

1. The St:nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C) Copies t^tw 'rr'-:i:iffi^: - 1. :: HIGH COURT' DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 146 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE RABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA foruou LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 147 OF 2025 Between

1. Pedda Balaiah, S/o Late Yerra Kommulaiah, aged 74 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Naramma, D/o Pedda Balaiah, aged 59 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

3. Narsimha, S/o Pedda Balaiah, aged 49 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

4. Ramachandraiah, S/o Pedda Balaiah, aged 44 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

5. Nagaraju, S/o Pedda Balaiah, aged 36 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/C laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.126 of 2O1O on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of SriV. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer '1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmen t dated 15.09.2022 rendr:red in L.A.A.S. No. 4 0f 2016 and the'common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. .125 ot ZO|S and batch 2. Thal the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (tiz1 than the varue 3. That the apperrants shail be entifled to afl statutory benefits as stipurated 4. That rrppelrants are not entifled to interest for the deray period 4g72 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. under the amended Land Acquisition Act preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// To, 't. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two Ct) Copies NV SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGIS ECTION OFFICER '..r:];f*mEr':.i _f;'.+ -:4.; ^ i ,: . 1jt HIGH COURT DATED:241041.2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 147 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DIS;POSED OF n*. t, ) \0 .* l'l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 148 OF 2O25 Between: '1. Bandi Ranganna, S/o Balaiah, aged 74 yrs 2. B. Bala Raju, S/o Ranganna, aged 39 yrs 3. B. Chandraiah, S/o Ranganna, aged 39 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 .04.201 1 passed in O.P.No.128 of 2O10 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer 3 4 A That the appeilants shail be entifled to ail statutory benefits as stipurated under the amended Land Acquisition Act That appellants are not entitred to interest for the deray period 4974 days in preferring the appeals. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/ MOHD. ISMAIL REGIST s ION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To, 1 The Serior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two Ctt 660;". W :riffi4ir .+- It -t- 3: e' HIGH COUR]' DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 148 of 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF a r/Yt'l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA HINAND KUMAR SHAVILI LAND ACOUISITI ON FIRSTAPPEAL NO:151 OF 2025 Between: 9ayqqfq, Wo.Kistanna, Age 80 years, Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At y District ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.402 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated . 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5367 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That trere shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two Ct) Copies TY SO/- MOHD. ISMAIL GISTRAR DEP s OFFICER HIGH COURT DAf ED:24l04lt2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 151 of2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF 1f, 1" \o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Laruo lco UISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 154 OF 2O2s Between: 't.

5. o. Govindla Sayamma, Wo. Gattaiah-died as per LRs-Appellants 2 to 6 G. Sudarshan, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 45 years. G. Krishnaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 53 years. G. Swamulu, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 55 years. M. Laxmidevamma, D/o. Gattaiah, aged 59 years. G. Narsimha, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 50 years. (Appellant-2 already brought on record) (All art agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District) ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.194 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 2 3 1 That ttre appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 20'16 and the common judgment dated 27 -09.11022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 1 25 of 2o1s and batch That tl'e Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+Z) than the value fixed b'1the Land Acquisition Officer That tlre appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act That aPpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4gz2days in preferring the appeals. That thr:re shall be no order as to costs. 4 5 SD/. MOHD. IS PUTY REG ECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD'lopies W { HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 154 ol2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 0 \? IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND Between: B. Balamma, Wo Kukkanna, aged 59 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appel lants/Cla imants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.104 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4978 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The St:nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies hfr,y/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY EGISTRAR SE OFFICER 'fY' **' HIGH COURT OATED:241041'.2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 159o1 2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 0\ 4\ i /- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUTS FIRST APPEAL NO: 16s OF 2078 Between: PrathapReddy,s/o.VenkatReddy,age52years,OccAgriculture'R/o'New Ngaralb Villag6, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, WanaparthY District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 .03.2011 passed in o.P.No.131 of 2011 on the file of th6 court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmenl daled 15.o9.20.22 rendered ii l.n.e.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in LA.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. Thatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4.Thatappellantsarenotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod4982daysin preferring the aPPeals.

5. That ihere shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Se:nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C) Copies ,W SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRA R SEC ICER ,.: ,... ':, l::;i:,8#kftl:"' '' + .':lt| ." :i'€ HIGH COURT DATED:2410411IO25 DECREE LAAS.No. 165 r>f 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \ \/ { \ tD IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 169 OF 2025 Between:

1. B.Konda Reddy, S/o.Chinna Gatta Reddy, age 70 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. B.Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o.Konda Reddy, 42years Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.135 of 2011 on thefileof the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That aSrpellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4982 days in preferrirg the appeals.

5. That thr:re shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY EGISTRAR SE OFFICER /ffRUE COPY// To, '1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. fwo CD Copies W HIGH COURT DATED:24104111025 DECREE LAAS.No. 169 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \D \7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF AP TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE , PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOU lSlTlON FIRST APPEAL NO: 174 OF 2A25 Between:

1. Smt. K. Laxmi Devamma, Wo. Hanmanthu Reddy, 78 years, Both are Occ- Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 2. K. Venkat Rama Reddy, S/o.Hanmanthu Reddy, age 52 years Both are Occ- Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.81 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 20 16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4994 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That tl'ere shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL EGISTRAR DE SE OFFICER d HIGH COURT DATED:241041',1025 DECREE LAAS.No. 174l>t 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 (\ \t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA . LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 179 OF 2025 Between:

1. G. Balaswamy, S/o Balaiah, aged 69 yrs 2. Venkataswamy, S/o Balaswamy, aged 39 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.154 ol 201O on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under i:he amended Land Rcquisition Rct 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stiputated : J[?fi'fr"ll,T:;:"J::t 'niitil; interest ror the deray period 4st3days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD rlopies i^v 'ffi''' HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 179 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \\ L0 \ / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRTtr TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMAI.A DEVI EADA Between:

1. Venkat Reddy, S/o.Papi Reddy, age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair lvlandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. V. Amarender Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, age 30 years Occ Agriculture, R/o. New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District.

3. V. Shashivardhan Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, age 30 years Occ Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Glaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.88 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for, the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 1 25 of 2015 and batch

2. That the [Vlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under tlte amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That ap pellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4989 days in preferrirrg the appeals.

5. That tht>re shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS ON OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W s -i': :"'j.fe,ffiiffii.': ::.:r* i '" 'l ! .3 HIGH COURT DATED:2410412125 DECREE LAAS.No. 180 c,f 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \c .Y' (l I f t. :j : i i I I i I i i i ; IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 181 OF 2025 Between:

1. Mukkapally Chandraiah @ C. Chandraiah, S/o.Laxmaiah, since died as per LR. Appellant-2

2. C. Venkataiah, S/o. Mukkapally Chandraiah @ C. Chandraiah, aged about 56 years. Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/C laima nts AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District ...RespondenURes pondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.107 of 2010 on thefile of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2A22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act I J[?:r?'#ffff:'J]* 5. That there shall'be no order as to costs. entitred to interest ror the deray period 4e02 days in /TRUE CAPY.7I To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD rlopies 4y SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS S OFFICER t n'T:ffi)+ft;i{mrt6Fffi#*; q; :::ii;:qri!!-:j:r _. 6 / HIGH COURT DATED:24104111025 DECREE LAAS.No. 181 rrf 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1O IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HoNouRABLE sRr .f$53EIL*NAND KUMAR sHAVrLr ANO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 182 OF 2025 Golla Swamulu, S/o.Ashanna, age 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A..Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3'1.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.101 o't 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmenl daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ol 20'15 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4989 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That tl" ere shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies TY SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL GISTRAR DEP SE OFFICER - .rr1 HIGH COURT DATED:2410411r-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 182 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \x t.o 't\ IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FlvE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 183 OF 2025

1. Smt. Telugu Balamma, W/o. late Ramulu, age 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Telugu Poshanna, S/o.Late Ramulu, age 52 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/Claimants ENf.) The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2O11 passed in O.P.No.6B ot 2O11on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for A.ppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmenl daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 20'16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4997 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That trere shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR S OFFICER :f :]:ii ::. ry"i' n r' HIGH COURT DATED:241O4i2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 183 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \x LU ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 184 OF 2025 Between:

1. Bathini Laxm6iah, S/o. Chinna Yellaiah, age 59 years. R/o Occl agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Ramudu, S/o. Laxmaiah, Aged 37 years. R/o Occl agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND '1. The Special Dy.Collector., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair Wanaparthy District.

2. Dastagiri, S/o. Laxmiah, aged 36 years, R/o. Nau,arala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict). (R-2 is not necessary party to this appeal) ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No. 115 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under the amended Land Acquisition Act

3. That the appeflants shafl be entifled to a[ statutory benefits as stipurated 4 That appellants are not entifled to interest for the deray period 4g72 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// To, 'I . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C[) Copies Mz SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR S CTION OFFICER -3. ,; HIGH COURT DATED:24104t2O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 184 of 2025 APPEAL IS DIS;POSED OF 4 L0 ,:,1!: .'::' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI ITION F RST AL NO: 185 O Between:

1. Bathini Laxmaiah, S/o. Chinna Yellaiah, age 59 years. R/o Occl agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Dastagiri, S/o. Laxmiah, aged 36 years, R/o. Nau,arala Village, Pebbair. Mandil, Wanaparthy Distric$. (R-2 is not necessary party to this appeal) ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No. 153 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy' Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated '15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under the amended Land Acquisition Act 3' That':h.e appellants shatl be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4' That erppellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4gZ2days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. prefer"ing the appeals. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR i t ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY/ To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies AN. l./u , iilrffirltffi'':.i HIGH COURT DATED:24104t2O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 185 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOU BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 187 OF 2025 Betvveen: Boya Komari B{aiah, S{o.Late Veeraiah, age 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/ o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appella n UC laima nt AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.43 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmentdated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officrr

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4628 days in preferling the appeals.

5. That ttrere shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR S OFFICER To, '1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies ry/ r.rqi+ffi$Fs,= j 'rI.s t.. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 187 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DIIiPOSED OF 11, \x IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA HINAND KUMAR SHAVILI LAND sITION FIRST APPEAL NO: '189 oF 2025 Between Boya Komari Tirupataiah, S/o.Balaiah, age 46 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nglrala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' At Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2O11 passed in o.P.No.46 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15 09 2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4628 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Se rior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CCr Copies M SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EGISTRAR DEPU SE OFFICER o:,.- jt.,fff'+: nt- ;'-: ' HIGH COURT DATED:2410412O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 189 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF (c $ 1 t2' r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA HINAND KUMAR SHAVILI LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 190 OF 2025 Between: Golla Krishnaiah, S/o. Kistanna, age 59 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No. 49 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgmenl dated 15.09.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4628 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, '1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C[t C6r;." 4y SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTI OFFICER !. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 190 of 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF rru THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD , THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 191 OF 2025 Between: Golla Madugani Chilkamma, Wo. Bichanna, Age 69 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 .03.2011 passed in O.P.No.53 of 201 1 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4992 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That ihere shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The S€,nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two Ct) Copies 4y SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR OFFICER ."'r?',,, 'i1l': i.$ j-'', HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 191 ot2O25 APPEAL IS DITiPOSED OF 1 \x l0 d IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HoNouRABLE sRr r,it-r:3E1L,rNAND KUMAR sHAVtLt AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 192 OF 2025 Between: Golla Shivudu, S/o.Kistanna, age 62 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...Respondent/ Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.201 1 passed in O.P.No.50 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That €rppellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 2993 days in prefering the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR U D \S ION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two Ct) Copies 4. ,.iHffi.!!$w it', "r, .f / HIGH COURT DATE D: 24 lO4l2O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 192 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF Lb IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA OEVI EADA LAND AC QUISITION FIRST AP PEAL NO: 193 OF 2025 Between: Golla Gattaiah, S/o Chinnaiah, age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31t03t2011 passed in o.P.No.52 of 2011on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of intermsof the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4992 days in preferring the apPeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CCr Copies ryr' SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEPU s N OFFICER i:r:,,"..:',.".i@'*'*tt":atr!i., r.,-4 t...'. HIGH COURT DATED:24104112025 DECREE LAAS.No. 193 of 2025 APPEAL IS DI$POSED OF \0 \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 194 OF 2425 Between: Boya Komari Maddamma, Wo. Narasimha, age 59 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Nigarala Village Pebbair Mandal Wanarparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No. 45 of 2011 on the file of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 o12015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act ,1

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4992 days in I j preferring the appeals.

5. That tl'ere shall be no order as to costs SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEP OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two Cfr Copies ,* 4{ HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 194 cf 2025 APPEAL IS DI{iPOSED OF IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOU FIRST APPEAL NO: 200 OF 2025 Between: Chakali Yerra Narsimha, S/o.Kistanna, age 74 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3110312011 passed in O.P.No. O.P.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, AdVocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4987 days in prefening the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. sDr- DE D. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W E.i;i.:, .' ,+*$t '' ll" d HIGH COURT DATED:241041?-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 200 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 t0V IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI LAN ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:201 OF2025 n

1. Bathini Balamasanna, S/o Karre Komaraiah -Since Died Per LR - Appellant No.2, 3 and 4

2.8 3B 4B . Kurmanna, S/o Bala Mashanna, aged 39 yrs . Maddileti, S/o Bala Mashanna, aged 36 yrs . Narsimha, S/o Balamashanna, aged 28 yrs (Appellant No.1 Died - as per LR Appellant No.2 and 3 already brought on record) All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District. Appellants/Claimants AND The special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU ResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.201'l passed in o.P.No.1't6 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. R. shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under the amended Land Acquisition Act

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4g67 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferrrng the appeals. SD/- MOHN. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W, , ,.l,l,i;ifTffi.' ,s / HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 201 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ,0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAM AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL.I AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between:

1. K.Balaiah, S/o.Veeraiah, age 70 years, 2. K.Pedda Mahesh, S/o.Balaiah, age 34 years 3. K.Chinna Mahesh, S/o.Balaiah, age 32 years 4. K.Shekhar, S/o.Balaiah, age 30 years, All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal.Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Cla imants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.126 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That t\e [\Iarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 422g days in 5. That tl'rere shall be no order as to costs. under the amended Land Acquisition Act preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR P D St ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 'l . The Ser ior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies b, ,4 7 HIGH COURT DATED:24l04lir-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 204 <tf2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF \4 \D \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA FI APPEAL Between:

1. Lacha Goud, S/o.Buddanna Goud, Age 65 years, R/o. New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Parameshwar Goud, S/o.Lacha Goud, Age 33 years, R/o. New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. Narender Goud, S/o. Lacha Goud, Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Clai ma nts AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.124 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

2. That lhe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That erppellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4gSi4 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. under the amended Land Acquisition Act preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DE S OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies - . ;:f;rT.'- -,-:i-5: .iir ,irJ .,if,&. r_wurffi:. .:::. /o/ HIGH COURT DATED:241041',2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 205 c>f2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF t0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 223 OF 2025 Between: Telugu Gattaiah, S/o.Nagaiah, age 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.8 of 201't on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Ae4uisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5001 days in preferring the apPeals. . ". l ...+,7

5. That thr:re shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. lwo CD Copies 4! SD/- MOHD. ISMA.IL REGISTRAR OFFICER |: .... FiEaatrt ir:i l]' : I 1" - ".!' 'it I HIGH COURT DATED:241O412O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 223 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISFIOSED OF 1 p IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA SITION FIRST AP Between:

1. B.Chinadraiah, S/o.Bichanna, age 79 years 2. Narsimha, S/o.Chandraiah, age 39 years 3. Swamy, S/o.Chandraiah, age 36 years 4. Balaiah, S/o.Kommulaiah, age79 years All Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/G laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.06.201 1 passed in O.P.No. 141 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds df appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

2. That lhe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That lhe appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That arppellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4574 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 'l . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Iwo CD Copies W HIGH COURT DATED:24104t2025 DECREE LAAS.No.231 ct2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF ,9. 1 fi \0 t,( IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AC OUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 225 oF 2025 Between

1. K.Ayyanna, S/o.Yellaiah age 79 years 2. Rangamma, D/o.K.Ayyanna, age 39 years All Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal'Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Raiiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbjir, Wanaiart-hy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 04.2011 passed in o.P.No.135 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1, That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the.judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 20 |6 and the common .iudgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 ot2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act 4' That ap6rellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4gg5 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferrin,; the appeals. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL ISTRAR S OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies $i, . ,:r"i+tl .: i!. .r . ri';';: 'r' HIGH COURT DATED:24l,Ofl2(t25 DECREE LAAS.No. 225 o't 2025 APPEAL IS DISF'OSED OF '[' \-c \7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:227 OF 2025 Between: B.Shekhar Reddy, S/o.Krishna Reddy, Age 49 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.06.2011 passed in O.P.No.'144 ot 2011 on the file of the CoLlrt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment daled 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('t+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4956 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That :here shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To, 1 . The Se rior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CEr Copies W SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS E ON OFFICER , . .: l!f4€i.]i_r* "l' 'm':'i":' i ,i l: ': HIGH COURT DATED:241O4,t2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 227 ,ct 2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF <nr ,. )'l,D .X \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUIS ITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 224 OF 2025 Between: Gunti Govindu, S/o. Chandraiah, age 55 years Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Speciat Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.201 1 passed in O.P.No. 25 oI 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in termsof the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No.4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2O15 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entifled to interest for the delay period 5021 days in 5. That the'e shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR c ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senic,r Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD C:opies w ! 1i': HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 228 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \x t0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUI SITION FIRST APPEAL NO 2300F 2025 Between: B. Nara Ngarala yanamma, Wo.Krishna Reddy, Age 81 years, All Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02.06.2011 passed in O.P.No. 143 of 2011 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated '15.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and batch

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act .t To, 4' That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4956 days in 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL GISTRAR OFFICER

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ,'.& . .:fi:'-'{$fiffi')i:' !r:1lii.;:r 4 l ':f HIGH COURT DATED:24l,04i2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 230 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF 4 I tC 1? IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA N FIRST APPEAL NO: Between: Suthari Buchanna,, S/o. Sayanna, aged 90 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparlhy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.20'10 passed in O.P.No. 416 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5404 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEP EGIS SE N OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 . The Senicr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD {}opies W r1;:iF:- t -4 HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 244 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 255 OF 2025 Between: Cheerla Venkataswamy, S/o. Laxmanna, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...Appella nUC la imant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No. 454 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act {

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5404 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That :here shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR TION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To, 1 The Senic,r Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD C opies 4f :-- --- r lr;tu- j " ''il' l d., HIGH COURT OATED:,2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 255 ol 2025 APPEAL IS DISF'OSED OF 1 \o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUIST TION FIRST APPEAL NO: 257 OF 2025 Between: Munakal S/o._ Laxmanna, aged BO_years, Occ. Agriculture, Rio. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wandparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy.Coltector,, Rajeev Lift trrigation Scheme, / phase_ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.p.No. 371 of 200g on the fite of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 20.16 and i=he common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (,l+2) than the 3. That the appellants shalr be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5419 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEP TY REGISTRA ON OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ,l-v ::' .is**alt{," . i-' ', i*"1 HIGH COURT DATED:241041it025 DECREE LAAS.No. 257 ctt 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF I 7\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 260 AF 2025 Between: Gunti Muralaiah, S/o. Kondanna, aged 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No. 427 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Th,at appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5409 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS DEPU SE OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Anu/ j:i. :" :i.. ,iti^-' ',&i.'si..i'l f HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 260 of 2025 APPEAL IS DIS,POSED OF \ 17' ic 1,{ ,l .i 1 ; IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THEHoNoURABLESMTJUSTICETIRUMALADEVIEADA T Between A.Vishnu sagar, s/o. chandramouli, g99g 58 years, occ Agriculture, Nagarala Vi llage, Pebb-air Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District "'RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No. 398 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. Ravula shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: L That the appeats are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.0g.2022'iendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the 3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 days in ;>referring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. S MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies M, i. ' ::,, ,. '- -, Tt .l HIGH COURT DATED:.Z4|O4t2O2s DECREE LAAS.No. 262 ot 2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ,j IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL . i TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 263 OF 2025 Between G.Sundaraiah, S/o. Kondanna, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/Cla i mants AND The Special Dy. Collector,, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No. 435 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two nrore times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEPU OFFICER To, '1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. fwo CD Copies W HIGH COURT DATED:2410411r-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 263 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF rO IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SFIAVIL] AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUI SITION FIRST APPEAL NO :264 0F 2025 Between: A. Ashok, S/o. Chandramouli, aged 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. .Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppetlanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... Res pondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.397 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for heai'ing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment ancj Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy,'Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.A9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act 4' Th,t appeilants are not entifled to interest for the deray period 5406 days _ in preferring the appeats. 5. That there shafi be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W SD/- MOHD. ISMAI L REGISTRAR D OFFICER j. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 264 of 2025 a APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF I \7', IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 265 OF 2025 Between: Suthari Krishnaiah, S/o. Buchanna, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.420 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common fudgment daled 27.09.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Th;rt appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 days in preferring the appeals.

5. Th:rt there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEPU s ION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CI) Copies jtr-.:.iEEi : . '' 't\f :' :47 . =.1.,1,'.-,.r+ '! 4 HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 265 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \ x t0 \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE / , PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA . LAND OUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 267 oF 2025 Between: G.Kurumurthy, S/o. Mlanyam Konda, aged 5.3. ygars, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villige, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU ResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.394 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the'common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 o12015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the 3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer stipulated uncler the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/ MOHD. ISMAIL D REGISTR \ E N OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, '1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies +v f HIGH COURT DATED:24104l,11025 DECREE LAAS.No. 267 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ( \? tD IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF.APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 268 OF 2025 Between: IVI.ohan Babu, s/o. venkq:yamy, ?.geq j3.years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wana[artiy Distritt. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.457 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ...FtespondenU Respondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment ancj Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the 3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Tlrat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 dilys in preferring the appeals.

5. Tlrat there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS DE S OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C[t Copies Ny - ir;,1..:-.;. . .+ir:T9"";1;,iii,;fi ,,"ttfl*m ,ir ;.I- HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 268 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF I rO yX IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWEUTV FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA OF Between: Gunti shiva Kumar, S/o. G.t\Iuralaiah, aged 40 years, occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collectc,r, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District Appeal filed under Section 54 of tne t.R.nct, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.446 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenU Respondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.s. No. 4 of 2016 ano tre common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.s. No. 12s of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shail be entitled to ail statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. T,rat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay peiioO S+OO days in preferring the appeals.

5. Tlrat there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies 4y 4r n HIGH COURT DATED:24l$4l.2O2s DECREE LAAS.No. 270 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISiPOSED OF \? \D IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEALNO:271 OF2025 A.Chandramouli, S/o. Ayyanna, aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.396 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all ,statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5404 days in preferring the aPPeals.

5. Thirt there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// s - MOHD. ISMAIL D REGIST s OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies r i . .:wi;r816ffir,+raef . .' ':.: L:f:i 3 d HIGH COURT DATED:24lo4l2r)25 DECREE LAAS.No. 271 'cf 2025 APPEAL IS DI:SPOSED OF 1 \0 1 1j ; i i i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 272 OF 2025 Between: 9unti Manyamkonda, s/o. Narayana, aged 73 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Ap pe I la ntlC Ia i ma nt AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.393 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 days in preferring the appeals.

5. Ttrat there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies /* SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DE REGISTRA ON OFFICER .".:,-,r&f#*i... ,,," * '. HIGH COURT DATED:241041?,.O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 272 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISI'OSED OF $, 1 \? t0 IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 274 OF 2025 Between: Nagaraju, S/o. Venkaswamy, Aged 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapafthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.455 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fi/lanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Ttrat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5408 derys in preferring the appeals.

5. Tlrat there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ,/ N OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies A\n, Y HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 274 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 tC 1z' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON LE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA HINAND KUMAR SHAVILI LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 275OF 2025 Between: Krishnaiah, S/o. Savari, aged 60 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparth Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenU Regpondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.424 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Th:rt appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5419 davs in preferring the appeals

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Oopies 4y :+,*fr: , HIGH COURT DATED:24104/2A25 DECREE LAAS.No. 275 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISF'OSED OF \D \/l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND tHe noruouRABLE sMT JUSTIcE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 276 OF 202s Between: Sharfuddin, S/o. Kaleel Ahmed, aged 65 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent App-eal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.413 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V [t/anohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5408 da'1s in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. D. ISMAIL REGIS OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD rlopies ,b, :? .,.:,*ffi i ' ".il HIGH COURT DATED:2410412Ct25 DECREE LAAS.No. 276 o12025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \? t0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA FIRST APPEAL Between G.Ramesh, S/o Village, Pebbair G.Satyanna, aged 40 years, Occ- Agriculturist, R/o. Nagarala Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.44O of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fvlanohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Th:rt appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. days in preferring the appeals. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Seni<>r Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Oopies Ny MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ON OFFICER 'rri:;r!Wr': ' a. ."-r8: f HIGH COURT DATED:24104t2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 281 ot 2O25 APPEAL IS DISF,OSED OF \0 \2 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 282 OF 2025 Between: Kaleel Ahmed, S/o. Sharfuddin, aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.412 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 da1,s in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DEP SE N OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senk>r Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Oopies W iffi' : I f.i,

1.. HIGH COURT DATED:.2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 282 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 10 i : : I I i ! ; IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rHE HbNouRABLE sRr J;Sr:3E[L*,*AND KUMAR sHAVrLr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 284 OF 2025 Between: Gunti Krishnaiah, S/o. Chinna Buchanna, Aged 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.383 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Maiket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5404 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR TION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies 4y -'--:-5itii;:::. ,. ,1.,' 'c: , ,,, , . l:;::',:; 'r '. (. HIGH COURT DATED:24 10412D25 DECREE LAAS.No. 284 o12025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \? t0 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE rH E HbNou RABLE s Rr .,,iSr:3E[L*NAN D KU MAR sHAVr Lr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 285 OF 2025 Shiva Krishna, S/o. Venkaswamy aged 40 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.20'10 passed in O.P.No.458 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act ., I-/

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGI OFFICER //TRUE COPY/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD 3opies 4V , '? HIGH COURT DATED:2410412t)25 DECREE LAAS.No. 285 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISF,OSED OF 1 \7 t0 I ::w- INTHEHIGHcoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONO URABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THEHoNoURABLESMTJUSTIGETIRUMALADEVIEADA Between: Gunti Muralaiah, s/o. Kondanna, aged 55 years, occ- Agriculture, R/o' Nagirati village,' pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District ...ApPellanUClaimant AND The special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair' WanaparthY District. "ResPondenu ResPondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A-Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.425 of 2009 on the file of the courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment ancl Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. v Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.Og.2O22'iendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgmentdated27.og.2o22renderedinL.A.A.S.No.125of2015and Z. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2\ than the 3. That the afpellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer stipulatedundertheamendedLandAcquisitionAct 4- Tlrat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5406 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. days in preferring the appeals. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL S ION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W -.

1.:, ..'iffit*- :', ,',1,11,.'-;....g t I { . HIGH COURT DATED:24l04litO25 DECREE LAAS.No. 288 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISFOSED OF \0 G IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LANO ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 289 0F 202s Between: Gunti Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. Muralaiah, aged 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.426 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material irapers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 541 1 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR TION OFFICER To, '1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2 Two CD 3opies ,I,Y . -.'&ffii" . .:i i l" HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 289 of 2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 0,'r },D iC r2 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE,HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA DAC UISITION FI TAP N Between V. Shekhar Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy aged 73 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair MandAl, Wanaparthy Diskict ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.462 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 541 1 dzrys in preferring the appeals

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR DE ON OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies AV .drr:tl.'r : :'r;:'-. t' HIGH COURT DATEDt24lO4l2.O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 290 ot 2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF q\ L0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA , LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 294 OF 2025 Between G.Satyanna, S/o. Kondanna, aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.434 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as 4. Ttrat appellants are not entifled to interest for the deray period 5406 5. Tlat there shall be no order as to costs. days in preferring the appeals. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR D ON OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies 4i. .'- . Y:1vtr4, :.tr:=. ,:1,',, {" HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No.294ol 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \0& 1 \?, 'l ,\ IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHI PRESENT D KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA N FIRST APPEAL N Between: Gunti Gopal, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.401 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment daled 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act ';r' To,

4. Trat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5411 dirys in preferring the appeals.

5. Tlrat there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR S OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies M- '-;;i#"t*''i ', !.. ,/ tF HIGH COURT DATED:24l$4lt-025 DECREE LAAS.No. 295 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF WI 10 \7', IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL,I AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 296 OF 2025 Between: G. Mahadev, S/o. Gopanna, aged 50 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...R.espondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.431 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2O16 and the commo.n judgment dated 17.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as 4. Th:rt appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 54.11 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. day s in preferring the appeals. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL D UTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies ry. .i:. : i*i&r 6EE' ,, ::i: , 'ii:' i r*'' , HIGH COURT DATED:24lo4l2r)25 DECREE LAAS.No. 296 of 2O2S APPEAL IS DII}POSED OF 1 .Lr( I0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 375 OF 2025 Between: V. Bhagavanth Reeddy, S/o.Ram Reddy, 67 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector,, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.464 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment daled 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer 3 T,rat the appelrants shafl be entifled to a[ statutory benefits as . stipulated under the amended L""J n"qri"iti#'e"i' 4. That appetrants are not enti,ed to t"t;;;;;;'iil detay period 5425 ^ 9:,y" in preferring the appeals. 5. I hat there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR I TION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies M- + ' ''-;"":.'":" ' ''' ,'- -:,' I HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 375 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DIT}POSED OF 1 \4 1D I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HoNoURABLE sRrrr.Xf;s ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVTLT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AC lSlTlON FIRST APPEAL NO: 383 OF 2025 Between: V. Vinobha Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy, 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, 7 Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.463 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment anci Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2i than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5425 days in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR s ION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CE, Copies 4Wr/. ,' '"ist*l;- 9,,.):- .': .l I HIGH COURT DATED:241041,2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 383 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF \ 17 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FTRST AppEAL NO: 422 OF 2025 Between: v. Prabhakar Reddy,.s/o.Ram Reddy, 65 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, WanaparthyDistribt. AND ...AppellanUClaimant .The special Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.465 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenU Respondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court betow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.s. No. 12s of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act .- q$.r --?r i',1 i.'-ri {i.? .;:E \ 4' Trat appeilants are not entifled to interest for the deray period s41g _ 9,ry. in preferring the appeals. 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, TION OFFICER 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy

2. Two CD Copies ry- I --_"."t . I. ,f / HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 DECREE LAAS.No.422 o12025 APPEAL IS DII}POSED OF \v \0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LANO ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 425 OF 2025 Between: V. Rameshwar Reddy, S/o. Shekar Reddy, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Ap pella n UC la ima nt AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Resp6ndenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.466 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material oapers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27 .0$.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5425 derys in preferring the appeals.

5. Ttrat tlrere shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL P TY REGISTRAR TION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CC, Copies M- ,le.".,'-."- i;.-:-z :lffiqryr'"''"" .t ,f HIGH COURT DATED:24104112025 DECREE LAAS.No. 425 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \7 tU\ ) I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY F}VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LlNp ACQUlSlrloN FIRST APPEAL NO: 433 OF 2025 Between:

1. C.Subhashini, Wo C.Jagadeeshwar Reddy, aged 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala village, Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District.

2. Laxmi Devamma, Wo Late Sai Reddy (Since died LR Appellant No- 3) Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 3. Prameelamma, Wo Dharma Reddy, aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o' Nagarata Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District- ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation.scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, WanaParthY District. - ...RespondenU ResPondent Appeal fited under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.83 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court betow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellants3 and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1S.O}.2OZ2 iendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.O9.2O22 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. Tl'rat the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Tl'rat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5030 da,ys in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies AW D/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER ;:#i,-:a: 1fflryj:q4:' c HIGH COURT DATED:2410412i025 DECREE LAAS.No. 433 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ri\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL ' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FI'E - rHE HoNouRABLE sRr JSISEILn,*aND KUMAR sHAVrLr THE HONOURABLE ",,OUP'"= TIRUMALA DEVI EADA OF Between: v'Rameshwar fgddy, s./o Dharma Reddy, aqed about 56 years, occ. Ag ricu rtu re, R/o. wagdrb ra vi r hg;, p;oor' ii rill'r'driw; #;;; v bi.t/ot " AND ...AppellanUClaimant ilL"":fiffFrl B[Sslector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-,, pebbair, ...RespondenU Respondent Appear fired under section s4 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 31'03'2011 passed in o.P.No.90 0f 2011 0nthe file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appear coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appelrant and Gp for Appears for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1' That the appeats are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1s.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. N;. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27-09.2022 rendered-in L.A.A.S. No. 125 0f2015 and 2' That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the 3' That the appellants shall be entitled- to all statutory benefits as value fixed by the Land Acquisition Omcer stipurated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Tlrat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay pe':'iod 5666 days in preferring the aPPeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ON OFFICER To,

1. The Serior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C[) Copies W ..;,r' -:., r:,.";'1:.-'.ii6-#m": HIGH COURT DATED:2410411tO25 DECREE LAAS.No. 435 ol2O25 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF (\\ \v r6 !: !: $r lIt{il t,Ilt IJ tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACOU FIRST APPEAL NO 436 0F 2025 Between Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o Dharma Reddy, aged about q0 years, Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Occ- ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P.No.89 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy,'Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

4. Tl^at appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 4060 days in preferring the appeals.

5. Thrat there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// MOHD. ISMAIL I I S OFFICER To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ry" liil-'uffi,;*" ," f u* HIGH COURT DATED:2410412:O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 436 of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 l4 \0 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA ND KUMAR SHAV]LI FI Nrd 7oF Between:

1. K.Ch.Balaiah, S/o.Buchanna, age 84 years Occ Agriculture' R/o' Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' 2.K.Kurmaiah,S/o.ChinnaBalaiah'age4gyears,Occ.Agriculture,R/o.Ngarala - Vittage, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationscheme-Phase.ll,Pebbair,At Pebbdir, WanaParthY District. ...RespondenU ResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L A'Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedatedoS.04.20llpassedino.P.No.16Tof2010onthefileoftheCourtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court bdlow and the material papers in thecaseanduponhearingtheargumentsofSri.NPraveenReddy'Advocatefor the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L'A'A'S' No 4 of 2016 and the common iudgment aaeizl .og.zo22rendered in LAA'S' No' 125 of 20'15 and 2. il"i the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

3. Tirat the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as 4. Tltat appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 502g 5. That there shall be no order as to costs. days in preferring the appeals. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUtrV REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies :, :'rjfi ji:Iff'f-if.{ii;'' i.r i HIGH COURT DATED:2410411t025 DECREE LAAS.No. 437 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 7 1D ^.'(ut) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE |-TONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL I AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAI XQ| 4380F 2025 Between: Dharma Reddy, S/o Ram Chandra Reddy, aged about 79 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated 31.O3.2O11passed in O.P.No.92 of 201'l on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dated 27.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. That appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5030 d:rys in preferring the appeals.

5. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SEC ION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To, '1 . The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanapadhy 2. Two CD Copies W .:,i.+&*mm#F i:.": -" 1: I:Il HIGH COURT DATED:24104r,2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 438 ot 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 0i,,1 t7 \v IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 'f40 OF 2025 Between:

1. M. Venkataiah, S/o. Sayanna, age 49 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Mangamma, Wo.Mallesh, age 44 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. Laxmi, Wo. Chandrayudu, age 34 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village,PebbairMandal,WanaparthyDistrict. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 .03.201 1 passed in O. P. No.93 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15.09.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 4 of 2016 and the common judgment dahed27.O9.2022 rendered in L.A.A.S. No. 125 of 2015 and

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act

4. Tl^at appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period 5035 days in preferring the appeals.

5. Tl^at there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR S CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies M. ,i II;I|* E t' HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 f DECREE LAAS.No. 44O of 2025 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF 1 \0

Find similar cases Start drafting free

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments