A.L.Ramana Kumar v. The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Guntur
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 19 Mar 2004
- Bench
- CHELAMESWAR, M VENKATESWARA REDDY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
2. The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Guntur. The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Guntur. .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ by setting aside the order passed by the Hon’ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.2407 of 1994 and batch dated 06-01-2003; by declaring the Proceedings No.A2/3040/93, dated 04-05-1994 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits and pass such further or other orders as the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SOORAM PRABHAKAR REDDY. Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR SERVICES II. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI M.VENKATESWARA REDDY W.P.NO.3946 OF 2003
ORAL ORDER:
(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar) When the matter is taken up for hearing it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development as well as the learned counsel for the writ petitioner that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by an unreported Division Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.26229 of 2003 dated 19th March 2004 and therefore, instead of going into the merits of the miscellaneous petition, writ petition itself can be disposed of in terms of the said judgment. In view of the above submission, recording the same, present writ petition is disposed of setting aside the order of the Tribunal in question, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for passing appropriate order on merits. No costs. ______________ J.Chelameswar, J _____________________ M.Venkateswara Reddy, J 14th June 2005. To
The Registrar, A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.
The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Guntur. The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Guntur. Two CCs to the G.P. for Services-II, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). Two CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 19 Mar 2004. The bench was CHELAMESWAR, M VENKATESWARA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.