✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Kotha Guranadham and seven others v. The Collector

Writ Petition No. 11705 of 2007NOUSHAD ALI

Case at a glance

Bench
NOUSHAD ALI

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mandal searched the household of the first petitioner and found nine gas cylinders and seized them under a cover of panchanama. Pursuant to the said seizure, a report was submitted to the second respondent-Collector (C.S.), Prakasam District, Ongole and proceedings are initiated under Section 6-A of the Act, 1955, for violation of A.P.L.P. (Regulation of supplies and Distribution) Order, 2000. The said seizure is under challenge in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not contravened the provisions of any control orders and the cylinders belong to each of them and the same are not liable for any confiscation. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader submits that enquiry under Section 6-A of the Act is pending and the petitioner can defend his case. I am not inclined to express any opinion on the merits of the case. The petitioners can participate in the enquiry and establish their case and it is for the first respondent to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. While admitting the writ petition, this court by order, dated

07.06.2007 in W.P.M.P.No.14546 of 2007 granted interim direction directing release of the seized cylinders. It is now represented by both the learned counsel that pursuant to the interim order, cylinders have been released to the petitioners. Having regard to the same and also pendency of the enquiry, it is appropriate the first respondent is directed to complete the enquiry, which has already been initiated and pass appropriate orders as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Dt.18.11.2010 ______________ NOUSHAD ALI J.,

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 11705 of 2007). ← Search more judgments