Sri Pentanolla Ravi Kumar v. 1. The State of Telangana

6. Sri Pentanolla Vinod Kumar, S/o Late Pentanolla Kistaiah, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 5-50, lnmulnarva Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ,....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI to quash the impugned proceeding vide file no. C1233312024' dated. 19-12-2024 passed by the respondent no. 3 for eviction for subiect matter of property House bearing no. 5-34/5, lnmulnarva Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and consequenfly direct the Respondent no. 2 to dispose of an appeal filed u/s 16 of the N/laintenance and Welfare Of Parents and Senior Citizens Act,2007 field by the petitioner against the respondent and declare the action of the Respondents as totally illegal, arbitrary, violation of the principles of Natural Justice, against law, violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia. i, l.A.NO:'l OF 2025 Petition Under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the impugned proceedings vide file no. C1233312024, dated. 19-12-2024 of the RDO for eviction in respect of the property passed against the petitioner herein till pending disposal of the main writ petition. |.A.NO:2 OF 2025 Between

1. Smt Pentanolla Yadamma, Wo Late Pentanolla Kistaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 5-50, lnmulnarva Village, Kothur lt/andal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Sri Pentanolla Vinod Kumar, S/o Late Pentanolla Kistaiah, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 5-50, lnmulnarva Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .....PET|TIONERS/RESPONDENTS Nos.5 & 6 AND '1 . Sri Pentanolla Ravi Kumar, S/o. Pentanolla Kistaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture and Business, R/o. 5-35/5, lnmulnarva Village, Kothur lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 2- The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at lbrahimpatnam. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sandnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District. 5. The Station House Officer at Kothur. .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Nos.1 to 4 -E---7Tff,-.ry -,,r,.. ,{ Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted in w.P. No. 10559 of 2025, dated 08-04-2025. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : GP FOR HOME Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6 : SRI K'VENUMADHAV The Court made the following ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.10559 OF 2025 ORAL ORDER: Irlcard leamed counsel lbr the petitioner, leamed Assistant Government ])leader for Womcn Development and Child Welfare and Mr. K. Venunradhav, lcamed counsel fbr respondent Nos-5 and 6.

2. The petitioner and rcspondent No.6 herein are the sons of rcspondent \,r.5. Shc has flled an application before respondent No.3 - Maintcnancc I ribr"rnal, sceking canccllation of Gitl Settlemcnt Dccd bearing No.rll63 of 2010, dated 14.10.2010. Vide order dated

19.12.2024- respondent No.3 allowcd the said application. Challenging the said ordtr. the petitioner has already preferred an appeal under Scction - | $ i I ) of the I'elangana Maintcnance and Welfare of Parents and Senior []itizens Act. 2007 (for short 'AcL,2007') vide Appeal No.l6 of 2025 befirrc rcspondcnt No.2 - Appellate Authority. He has filed the present rvrit petition chal[enging the vcry samc order. Thus, he is pursuing paralicl remedies which are impermissible

3. Thcieforc, this rvrit petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 - appcllate authority to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner vide Appeal No.16 ol 2025 under Scction - 16 (1) of the Act, 2007 /a- 2 challenging the ordcr daled 19.12.2024 of respondent No.3 and also stay petition filed by the petitioner in accordance with law. Hor,vever, respondent No.2 shall dispose of thc stay petition filed by the petitioner to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19.12.2024 within one (01) week from the date of receipt ofcopy olthis order, and the appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Till disposal ol thc said stay application, interim protection granted hy this CouIt on 08.04.2025 shall continue. In thc circumstances ofthe case, thcre shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ pctition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA S STANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To Telanoana at Hvderabad, Telangana State'

1. The Principal Secretary' Revenue Department, Secretariat' State of 2. il;Dl;;;rcoiiector, Ranqa Reddv District, At lbrahimpatnam' i. f6" n"u""re Divrsional b--fric.r jn,i sru Divisonal Magistrate,, Sandnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District, 4. The Station Hbuse Officer at Kothur' ;. i;; cE; b cF ron nrvEi'lue, High court for the state of relangana at o r'i,i"cds to 6C rbn HoME, High court for the state of Telangana at ? ijl,;-cC6dnr sunesu sHlv SAGAR, Advogqle.[oPUC] 8 o;; cc i" snt K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate (oPUc) 9. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad. [OUT] Hvderabad. [OUT] SA BS W HIGH COURT DATED:1110912025 , .. j\.:. 'tt ,-, ,l i .c[r' i,\ c\r, lW irlji; -, .,/ ..-/ ORDER WP.No.10559 of 2025 '\.- -.'r '' ..\\:.1 t .. -ij' DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 1 t7 q *