High Court · 2025

Judgment

5. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Rajanna Siricilla District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siricilla, Rajanna Siricilla District The Tahsildar, Koranaraopet Mandal, Rajanna-Siricilla District. Samalla Narendar, S/o Late Shankar, aged about 30 years, Occ. VRA, 0/o Tahsildar, Koranaraopet, Ri/o Nimmapalli Village, Koranaraopet Mandal, Rajanna-Siricilla District. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more Particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in non-considering the petitioners representations dated 1010312016, 181512017 and 10/05/2019 and to conduct the enquiry on the matter of illegal posting of the respondent No.S is highly illegal, a,rbitrary, unconstitutional, violation Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 ot the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to remove the job of the Sth respondent, to conduct the enquiry and to appoint the petitioner as Village Revenue Assistant in Nimmapalli Village basing on the representations dated 1010312016,181512017 and 1010512019 made by the petitioner lA NO: 1 oF2020 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in tfre afiiavit fifed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct No.2 tc, 4 to remove the job of the sth responderit, to conduct the il;;;;;;;;", :^"^;,J;; t; aopoint the petitioner as Village Revenue Assistant in Nimmapalli lr.inq on the representations dated .1010312016, 181512017 and il;;J ioloizoie ;r:.je by the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos'l to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent NO'5: -- The Gourt made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.12944 OF 2020 OR D ER: Heard Sri Rapolu Bhaskhar, l€arned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearlng on behalf of the respondent Nos' 1 to 4'

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under: ".......to issue an order or direction more Particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in non-considering the petitioners representations dated l0/0312016, lB/5/2017 and lO/05/2OLg and to conduct the enquiry on the matter of illeqal posting of the respondent No'5 is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional violation Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) g and 2L of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to remove the job of the 5th respondent to conduct the enquiry and to appoint the petitioner as Village Revenue Assistant in Nimmapalli Village basing on the representations dated 10/03/2016 lB/5/2077 and lO/05/2019 made by the petitioner and to 2

3. It is !;pecific case of the petitioner that the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are not considering the petitioner's representations dated 10.r1r3.2016, 18.05.2017 and 10.05.2019 seeking conduct of enquiry on the matter of illegal posting oF the respondent No.5 as Village Revenue Assistant as highly illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitution a I violation principles of Natural lustice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. Aggrieved by the said action of the respondents, the present Writ Petition is fiteO.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the limited relief as prayed for by the petitioner is a direction to the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put- forth by the petitioner vide petitioner's representations, dated 10.03.2016, 18.05.2017 and 10.05.2019 addressed to the 2"d respondent herein. fn the said representations, the petitioner had requested the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry with regard to the appointment of the Sth respondent herein on the death 3 of the petitioner's grandfather on comPassionate grounds. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

5. petationer further submits the petitioner had requested official respondents herein several times to appoant the petitioner as VttA on compassionate grounds on the death of petitioner's grandfather, but however the official respondents herein postponed the said issue for years together and the 5th respondent herein cottuded with the then revenue Authorities and managed them and got the job on compassionate grounds on the death of petitioner's grandfather depriving petitioner's legal entitlement for the said job.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 submats that the Writ Petition could be disposed of directing the 2"d respondent to consider the grievance of the petationer as put-forth by the petitioner vide petitioner's representations dated 1O.03.2016, 4

18.05.2077 and 1O.05.2019 addressed to the 2nd respondent herein within a reasonabte period in accordance to law, Z. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government pleader for revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Takinq into consi deration: 8 a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case. b) The submissions made by the tearned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearlng on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put-forth by the petitioner vide petitioner's representations, dated 1O.03.2016, 18.05.2017 and 1O.OS.2019 addressed to the znd , 5 respondent herein pertaining to conduct of an enquiry on the appointment of the 5th respondent, on the death of the petitioner's grandfather on compassionate grounds illegally, within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, after giving due notice to both the petitioner and also the 5th respondent herein and pass appropriate orders on the said representations of the petitioner and duly communicate the decision on the said representations of the petitioner to the petitioner herein. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.K. SREE RAMA M RTHY G TRAR DEPUTY SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat Building' Secretariat, HYderabad.

2. The District Collector, Rajanna Siricilla District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siricilla, Rajanna Siricilla District 4. The Tahsildar, Koranaraopet Mandal, Rajanna-Siricilla District' 5. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana TOUTI

7. Two CD Copies KKS BS HIGH COURT DATED:1 110312025 CC TODAY "-aa r\e S rAr€ . hPfi M?5 . .1 .. tl 11 :./ ^ .l ./' /\: ./ /a- 2'' ORDER WP.No.12944 of 2020 i :|.'.^^-,v\,2/,, :._, "{r :'-:: . - -_-_--.,J DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?e t4'