Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2008
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 17 Dec 2008
- Bench
- GHULAM MOHAMMED, SANJAY KUMAR
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for the reasons
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for the reasons and in terms of the judgment of this Court in WP No.20467 of 2007, dated 25-3-2008. No costs. _____________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J ___________________ Sanjay Kumar, J Dated : 17th December, 2008 Nrg. ..... REGISTRAR //…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records relating to and connected in OA.No.7761 of 2006 dated 02.01.2007 on the file of Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal and quash the same and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent : MR.V.SREE RANGA RAO The Court made the following : ORDER THE HOH’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WP NO.20500 OF 2007
ORDER :
( per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed ) When the matter has come up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Government Pleader for Services-II and the learned counsel for the respondent that the matter is covered by the judgment of this Court in WP No.20467 of 2007, dated 25-3-
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for the reasons and in terms of the judgment of this Court in WP No.20467 of 2007, dated 25-3-2008. No costs. _____________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J ___________________ Sanjay Kumar, J Dated : 17th December, 2008 Nrg. ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for the reasons
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Dec 2008. The bench was GHULAM MOHAMMED, SANJAY KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.