Goverdhana Manjula v. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent No.2 and 3 in failing to mutate the name of the petitioner in revenue records regarding agricultural land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-34 Guntas situated at sy. No. 52111 situated at Padamati Keshapur Revenue village Bachannapet Mandal of Jangaon District submitted through the Dharani Portal vide Application No 2500117454 without any reason is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 and 300-A of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to mutate the name of the petitioner in revenue records in pending application No. 25001.17454 herein in r,:rspect of land admeasuring an e;xtent of Ac.1-34 Guntas situated at sy. No. s:,11/1 situated at Padamati Keshapur Revenue Village Bachannapet Mandal of Jangaon District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in si.rpport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2i and 3 to mutate the name of the petitiorrer in revenue records in pending aoplication No. 25001 17454 submitted by the petitioner herein in respect of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-34 Guntas situi,rted at sy. No. 52111 situated at Paclamati Keshapur Revenue village Bachannzrpet Mandal of Jangaon District perrding disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI pONNAM MAHESH BABU Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY UIRIT PETITION No.11O3 L of2o25 ORDER: . It is stated that the petitioner is the owner arrd possessor of the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 1.34 guntas in Sy'No'521/1 situated at PadamatiKeshapur Vil1age, Bachannapet Mandal' Jangaon District, having acquired the same from her father' It is further stated that the petitioner has submitted online application uide No.2500 11,7454, dated 07.03.2O25 through Dharani Portal seeking mutation of her name in the revenue rccords in respect of the aforesaid lands. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receiving the said application, the respondent authorities are not considering the same for mutation of her name in the revenue records. Hence, the writ Petition. c Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended 3. that Section 6 of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2O2O (for shorl 'Act, 202O') confers power on the Tahsildar to update the Record of Rights when rights over land are acquired succession, survivorship, or inheritance. Legal heirs or through 2 family members must reach a consensus on how to divirlc the land and submit ei . oint agreement online . The Tahsildar, after rssrgning a convenient cia te and time, will verify the documents rrnd collect mutation <:ha-13es. Upon verihcation, the Tahsildar u.ill instantly upclaLe the r,:c r,rd.s and issue either a new oi updated Pa. tadar Pass Book-cum-Till,: Decd, along with an extract of the changcs.. The heirs are also required to furnish family detaiis for inclusion in the updated title deeds.

4. Sri L.l'.irvinder, learned Assistant Government I'leader for Revcnue appcrl-ing lor the respondents has not disputed about the submission of the Dharani application and it is statecl that i[ the application submitted by the petitioner fulfils al1 the reouirements, the responde:rl authorities wili consider the same.

5. In viql1:, of the above submissions, this Court, dccms it appropriate to rll5pe56 of the writ petilion directing the ; espondent authorities tri examine petitioner's application uicle No.25)Ol 77454, datcd O7.03.1)(t115 and if the petitioner satished all thc rerluirements for mutation ol her name in the revenue records under the provisions of the ROR Acl. 2O2O and the circular instructions issueil by CCLA uide Circular ltrc. 1 of 2021, dated 15.01.2021 ar-rd Circu.ar No. 1 of 2024, daLecl 23 .O2.2O24, consider the same and if thc p, rtitioner is other.wise not entitled, the respondent authorities sherll pass a /l 3 reasoned order strictly in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of eight (g) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6 With the above observations, this Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 7 As a Sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. T.TIRUMALA EVI DEPUW REGI SECTION FFICER

1. The Principq! Secret.aryr Revenue, Registration Stamps Department, State of I elangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Janagaon District, Telangana. 3. The Tahsildar/Joint Sub Registrar, MRO Office, Bachannapeta Mandal, Jangaon District.

4. One CC to SRI PONNAM MAHESH BABU, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Two CCs to SRI L. RAVINDER AGp for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies w MP HIGH COURT CVBR,J DATED:1110412025 ( 1. s, I, a- la) . (-) tI?\ \. :' \- ': r'_ - _'\_:-- -. - EX\.t<r'l\ ffi i"i: ';' i\ + a,!\ ORDER WP.No.11031 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS . i i I i i I I I i ,t@1 \