Managing Director, Sri V.Kota Reddy v. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C V NAGARJUNA REDDY
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Between: 1 M/s. Aparna Constructions & Estates Pvt. Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri V.Kota Reddy, S/o. Sri V.S.Kota Reddy, A Company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956, R/o. Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 2 N.Subhash, S/o. N.M.Chowdary, R/o. Plot No. 198, Road No.14, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, Plaintiff No.2 are represented by their G.P.A. Holder Sri V.Kota Reddy, S/o. V.S.Kota Reddy, aged about 39 years, R/o Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 3 S.Prabhakar, S/o. S.A. Murty, R/o. H.No. 6-3-1090/C/A/1,Lovely Mansion, Somajiguda, Hyd., Plaintiff No.2 are represented by their G.P.A. Holder Sri V.Kota Reddy, S/o. V.S.Kota Reddy, aged about 39 years, R/o. Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 4 N.Ravindra Kumar, S/o. N.M. Chowdary, R/o. Plot No. 198, Road No.14, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. Plaintiff No.2 are represented by their G.P.A. Holder Sri V.Kota Reddy, S/o. V.S.Kota Reddy, aged about 39 years, R/o. Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 5 Smt. N.Vijayalakshmi, W/o. N.M.Chowdary, R/o. Plot No. 198, Road No.14, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. Plaintiff No.2 are represented by their G.P.A. Holder Sri V.Kota Reddy, S/o. V.S.Kota Reddy, aged about 39 years, R/o. Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 6 M.Satyanarayana, S/o. Sri M.Venkatappaiah, R/o.8-3-231/C/165, Srikrishna Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, Plaintiff No.2 are represented by their G.P.A. Holder Sri V.Kota Reddy, S/o. V.S.Kota Reddy, aged about 39 years, R/o. Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. AND Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner, ..... PETITIONERS
Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri.S.Venkateshwarlu Counsel for the Respondent: --- The Court made the following :
O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to set aside notice dated 27-09-2002 issued under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. At the hearing, Sri S.Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the State Government issued G.O.Ms.No.901 dated 31-12-2007, providing for regularization of unauthorized constructions. He further submitted that in pursuance of the same, the petitioners filed an application for such regularization and that therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with liberty the petitioners to pursue the said application regularization. Dated 27th February, 2009 C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.