High Court · 2025

Housewife, NeaiSripada Chowk, Manthani, District Peddapally.

2. Ravikanti Bhulaxmi, W/o Chandramouli, Aged about 49 years, Occ' Housewife, R/o H. NO. 1 -'1 0 12, Sripada Chowk, Manthani, District Peddapally' 3. lllendula Chandrakala, W/o Bapu, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Housewife' Rl/o Sripada Chowk,Manthani, District Peddapally.

4. Ravikanti Annapurna, Wo Sattaiah, Aged about 55 ye-ar5, Occ. Housewife' Rl/o Door NO. 1-10/1 , Sripada Chowk, Manthani, District Peddapally.

5. Vadluri Shankaraiah, S/o Shantaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.N0.4-98lASl4,Salya Sai Nagar, Manthani, District Peddapally.

6. Mandala Pochanna @ Pochaiah, S/o Yellaiah, aged about 55 years, Occ' Flour Mill, Ryo H.No:B/3 and 1-'10/1 , Sripada Chowk, Manthani, District Peddapally. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal'Secretary Municipal Administration and-Urban Develbpment Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Additional District Collector, (Local Bodies), District Peddapally At Collector s Complex, Peddapally District Headquarter. Municipal Council Manthani, Peddapally District Rep. by its Commissioner. At Manthani. 2 3 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances. stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a wrii, order or direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of, Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated o5lo1t2o24, 2110212025 in pursuance of the diiections dated 291O4t2O13 passed in W.P.No.9615 of 20't3 is arbitrary, illegal against the principles of natural justice and against Article 300-A of the constitution oi lndi" and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the representations filed by the petitioners in pursuance of the orders of this Honourable court {ated 2910412013 passed in w.p.No.96't 5 of 2013 in the interest of justice I IAN F 2025 Petition under section '1 51 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the representations made by the petitioners dated 0510112024 and 2110212025 in pursuance of the orders passed by this Honourable court in w.P.No.9615 of 2013 daled29l04l2o13, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitiorers: SRl. MIRZA AIJAZ ALI BAIG Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent NO.3: SRt KRISHNA REDDy PUTTA SC FOR TG MC The Court made the following: ORDER / TIIE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE B. VTJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETTTIO N No.10538 F 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to declare the action of respondent No'3 in not considering their representations dated 05.01 .2024 and 2l'02'2025' pursuant to the order dated 29.04-2013 passed by this Court in W'P' No'9615 of 2013, as being illegal and arbitrary'

2. Heard Mr. Mirza Aljaz Ali Baig, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Krishna Reddy Putta, leamed standing counsel for the Telangana Municipalities, appearing for respondent No'3'

3. tt is stated that the petitioners are the owners of the small plots situated at Manthani Village and Mandal, Peddapally District' which were regularized by the Tahsildar, Manthani Mandal' vide proceedings in File No.Bl/2/1999 in terms of G'O' Ms'No'508 (Revenue AS.I) Department dated 20'10'1995 by payment of regularization charges. Thereafter, due to some false complaints the District Collector' Karimnagar District' has set aside the proceedings oI the Tahsildar, Manthani Mandal' in File 2 No.B1/2/1999 r'rdc proceedings in File No.E3l3952l1 999 dated

28.05.2000. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners have filed W.P. No.20259 of 2000, which was allowed by this Court by the order dated 01.08.2001. The E.O., Gram panchayat Off,rce, Manthani, pref'erred an appeal in W.A. No. 1446 of 2001 challenging the order dated 01.08.2001 passed by this Courr in W.P. No.20259 of 2000. However, the appeal was dismissed for default by the order dated 05.02.2009. Grievance ofthe petitioners is that respondenl No.3 is not considering their representations for allotment of house numbers in respect of their individual plots, as such, they are constrained to approach this Court.

4. Leamecl Standing Counsel l'or respondent No.3 submitted that appropriate action wilt be taken on the representations of the petitioners dated 2l .02.2025, in accordance with law.

5. Recording the aforesaid submissions of the leamed Standing Counsel for respondent No.3, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 to forthwith consider the representations of the petitioners for allotment of house numbers to their respective plots, and pass orders, in accordance with law, by affording i 7t/ To, \ J opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications' if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. SD/. T. TIRUMALA DEVI D UTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER I Oepartment Secretariai, Hyderabad'

1. The Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Developme ' 2. The Additional District Collector, (local Bodies)' District Peddapally At -' 3. The Commissioner, Municipal Council Manthani, Peddapally District At Coitector s Complex, Peddapally District Headquaner' Manthani.

4. One CC to SRl. MIRZA AIJAZ ALI BAIG Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA SC FOR TG MC [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV ,High court for the state of Telangana. [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at . HYderabad. [OUT] 8. Two CD CoPies ;, KKS GJP /f1b HIGH COURT DATED:081041202s ORDER WP.No.10538 of 2025 HE ST4 2 4 I,'R z0zs o o {J \\ :; \ DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Grto W