M/s ACE VENTURES v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 2 to 3 to provide electricity connection extension of HT Cat-ll, 11KV supply for a CMD of 500KVA with a CL of 1500KW Connection to the Commercial Building in H.Nos.18-81/Al to 5 (4A to 4D), Survey Nos.95 (part), 96 (Part) and 98 (part), total land admeasuring 4514.5 Sq. Yards, situated at Gaddiannaram, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Main Road South- Sai Balaji Towers Apartment East- Bhagya Sri Function Hall West- H.No.13-'18-92 of Janampally Complex. Without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the 4th respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection to the above referred premises, is illegal and arbitrary. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responderts 2 to 7 to provide electricity connection erxtension of HT Cat-ll, 1 1 KV supply f,:r a CMD of 500KVA with a CL of 1 500KW Connection to the Commercial Buildinl; in H.Nos. 18-81/A1 to 5 (4A to 4D), Survey lrlos.95 (part), 96 (Part) and 98 (pad), total land admeasuring 4514.5 Sq. Yards, situated at Gaddiannaram, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bourrded by North- Main Road; South- Sai Balaji Towers Apartment; East- Bhagya Sri Function Hall; West- H.No.13-18-92 of Janampally Complex. Without insisting Lrpon occupancy certificate from the, Blh respondent pending disposal of main writ pretition and may deem fit and properr in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY counsel for Respondents No.2&3 ' 3E IaT,..='DJ#TREDDY, Counsel for the Respondent No.4:SRl SRINIVAS RAO PACHWA,SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER 7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK - W.P.No.1O482 of 2O25 - ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this i^,.rit petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: "To issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WzuT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents 2 to 3 to provide electricity connection extension of HT Cat-ll 11KV supply for a CMD of SOOKVA with a CL of 1500KW Connection to the Commercial Buiiding in H.Nos.18-81/A1 to 5 (4A to 4D), Survey Nos.95 (part), 96 (Part) arrd 98 (part) total land admeasuring 4514.5 Sq Yards situated at Gaddiannaram, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, T S, bounded by North: Main Road, South: Sai Balaji Towers Apartment, East: Bhagra Sri Function Ha1l, West: H.No.13-18-92 of Janampally Complex without insisting upon occup.rncy certificate from the 4th respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection to the above referred prernises is illegal and arbitrar5r". \ \

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energr for respondent No. 1, Sri N.Sreedhar \ Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos.2 & 3 and Sri Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.4 and perused the record. 2

4. Today, when the matter is taken up, it is subnritted by the learned couns;el for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order daled 26.7 '2018 passed by this Court :rr W.P.No.26O85 of 2O18. The same is not seriously disputed b1, thc learned counsel appearing for the respondents

5. In view of the above, for the reasons a-like in tht: order dated

26.7.2018 in V/ P.No.26085 of 2018, this writ petition is disposed of directing the res;pondents to release power supply to the premises of the petitioner s,ubject to the compliance of terms ald conditions and on furnishing; an undertaking to produce the occupal cy certificate from the colrrr(rmed Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if rxr such occupancy certificate is producecl within such period, it is opr:n to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordalce u,itlr law- jr4iscellaneous applications, if an.r, pending in this writ petitiorr stand closed. l //TRUE COPY// sD/- L.LAKSHn4/eleu - DEPUTY REGISTRAR \rt \i a SEC}TION OFFICER ! To, I 2 J +:elJ'lff iIl""?:l3YlrEBB'ii a nd E ne rsv Dep a rtm e n t s ecreta ri at' state or I'ilfl ,'i{:'J:",:#l:p":%YB1i515l'#fl ?tSfl ['s'?xJ' Ii::i#j#3i,?lgY,fl The Superintending Engineer' Operation/ Saroornagar Circle TGSPDC L' Saroornagar

4. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, L.B.Nagar Zooe

5. One CC to SFll THAKUR ROOPA SINGH' Advocate lOPUCl 6.TwoCCstoGlPFoRENERGY,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana.[oUTt -'-:.:.:.::,;::;::.. -:::=:::::'-:- ..:1:"f l --]:;:-: -:--ix Erx,

7. One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCUTRANSCO. loPUcI /

8. One CC to SRI SRINIVAS PACHWA, SC FOR GHMC. IOPUC] 9. Two CD Copies. BSK PSK HIGH COURT DATED:0810412025 \ CC TODAY \ \ ORDER WP.No.10482 of 2025 + ,:) c t) -=:= lHE s t"4 \ oQ. 7 ((\( z o i 11 APt 2rui 1)c. '. icr't -r,' .2 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ( TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26O85 of 2O18 ORDER: Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R- Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for Telarlgana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Stalding Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for 4rh respondent.

2. It is statecl bi- learricd counsel appearing for the petitioner as rvell as Sn R.VinoC Rcddl', Standing counsel appearing for responclent N,,s.I tc i that the issue in this Writ Petition is co.. ered b., the order of this Court d1.23.03.2018 in lV.P.No.9789 ol 2018 ,

3. Therefore lor ri:asons alike. this Writ Petirion is also disposed of rvith a diiectlon to tlie respondents to release the power supply to the pren.rises oI the petitioner' subject to the compliance of ttre terms and conditions ar-rd on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certifrcate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupalcy certihcate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to 2 /

4. Consequr:rLtly, miscellaneous peLitions pending, if aly, shall stand disrr issed. 261h July, 2lO 1ti. M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J i l I I I i '