l.MDtvlahmoodPasha v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim Direction granted in l.A.No.01 of 2o2s in w.p. No.105 lB of 2025, dt.08-04.2025 and dismiss the writ petition No.'t0s18 of 2025 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners : M/s THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (REVENUE) Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Gp FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINtSTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY The Court made the following ORDER THE HCIN'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN,REDDY !VRIT P ON No.1O 518 of 2(,25 ORDER Smt. Tlakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that pursuant to the order passed by this \ \ Court dated 0A O4-2O25, building permission has been granted to the petitioners:rnd as such. the cause in the writ petition does not survive for furth er adjudication.

2. Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned standing counsel for GHMC, submitt(d that substantive writ petitions viz. Wp.No.18768 of 2OLl and \A'P.No.26830 of 2007 challenging the proceedings under the UrLan Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, t976, are pending adjudication before this Court and construction undertaken by t re petitioner is subject to the result of the said writ petitions. He further submitted that the petitioners shall not claim any equities in case the aforesaid two writ petitions filed by the original owners/,iecla rants are dismissed.

3. In view c f the above, considering that building permission has been grantt:d to the petitioners pursuant to the order dated

08.04.2025 pas:;ed by this Court, the writ petition is disposed of making it clear t hat the construction undertaken by the petitioners ) shall be subject to the outcome of WP.No.1B768 of 2011 and WP.No.26830 of 2OO7. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. t //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. AMMAJI UTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER Secretariat State of Urban develoPment. Telangana at HYderabad.

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue (U.L'C) Departme Z ffre iiincipal S6cretary, State of Telangana Municipalities administration :. in! comrn-i.JonLr, Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation, Tank Bund + ifi.-o"prtv commissioner, Gre€ter Hyderabld Municipal corporation, circle flr.zo, 6Hi,rtC, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District' s. ine Alst. City'Plannei, Grbater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation' 6. i;; C"c; i5-ci' ron nevENUE, H'igh court for the state of relangana at Serilingampally Zone. Ranga Reddy District' Hyderabad.

7. .CP TbN MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN Hyderabad. [OUT] rwo CCs to o'EViioirr,rEr.rT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [oUT] o"" cCt" rr,tTs rue(un RooPA SINGH, Advocate IoPUC] - il; ca i.5nr c.tunoHUSUDHAN REDDY, Advocate (oPUc) 0.Two CD CoPies To o I 1 SA GJP 't I I I i i I I I i I I I I I l I I I i HIGH COURT DATED:30lO7l',2025 ORDER WP.No.10518 of 2025 DISPOSING oF THE W.P WITHOUT CC.STS. ./4 44.