The High Court · 2025

1 [4::, irqyfyq, The,Di*rict Coileltor, Warangar District, Warangat z. .bnn. L Kamesh, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal Diiision, 3. Shri A. Nagender Rao, Superintending Engineer, Roads and Building Dept. , 4. The Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation (GWMC), Waranoal. (F+^t-qLlgtll impteaded as per the Hon,bte Court Order dtd.12.07 .2024 in CC No.833/2024). 5 Sri Rathod Ramesh, Revenue Divisional Officer, Hanumakonda. Waranoal. (R5 is impreaded as per court order oateo zi.oa.zozs i" lA.r.rols'"iztit"i" C.C.No.833 of 2024)' .,. RESPON DENTS/RESPONDENTS lA NO: 6 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner/respondent no. 1 before this Hon'ble court on 2s/o41202s and in future date of hearings, and in view of the issue of the notification for acquisition of the land the contempt case may be closed and pass such o her lrder or orders as this Hon,ble Court may dee:r-n fit and proper in the circumstances; >f the case and in the interests of Justice. IANO:4OF2 02,1 Petition urde- section 15'1 cpc praying that in the circurnsrarces stated in the affidavit filed in r;upport of the petition, the High Court mity b:: pleased to dispense with thrr p'3 sonal appearance of the petitioner/respon d 3nl no.3 before this Honbre c.uri or.r 30ro8r2024 in cc No. 83312024 disposar .f lre contempt case. Counsel for the F etirirners ; SRl. V.M.M. CHARY Counsel for the Fesp:ndent No.1,2 AND 5 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Resprrndent No.3 : G.p FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS Counsel for the Resprondent No.4 : SRI pASHAM MOHITH S.C FOR WRANGAL MUNICIP,\L CORP. The Court made flre ic llowing: ORDER l I l HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA CONT EM PTC .8330 F2o24 ORDER: Heard Sri V.M.M. Chary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, tearned Assastant Government pteader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.l, 2, and S, tearned Assistant Government pleader for Roads and Buitdings, appearing on behalf of respondent No.3, Sri S. Surender Reddy, learned Standing Counset for Warangal Municipal Corporation, appearing on behalf of respondent No.4. 2 h n DTaveras under: a d h "to punish the respondents herein for committing contempt of Court by wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court in W.p. No. 15960 of 2023 dated 18.07.2023,,.

3. The petitioners filed the present Contempt Case complaining violation of the order of this Court dated 18.07.2023 passed in W.p. No.15960 of 2023. ,l 2 C.C \c. B:3 of 2024

4. The lea-ned counsel appearing on behalf r:f the petitioner' ;uLrrnits that thouqh notice before adrr is;sion had been issued r the present Contempt Case the dirr:ct ons of this Court d;ted 18.07.2023 passed in W'P No l5960 of 2023 for pas:;lng of an award alrd payment of cornlerlsation to the petil ionr:rs in accordance to law, had not been ct:mplied with as or cle te and therefore, the present Conte np:t Case should be keF,t pending till the steps are conclutitrd by the respondenls i1 the preserrt Contempt Case, by passing of Award anrl rr: easing compensation to the petition€ rs as' per Law.

5. The le,arned Assistant Government Pleader- for Land Acquisitior orl the other hand submits that the Com ni.;sioner, Greater rVa -,:ngal Municipal Corporation, Warartg'rl vide Roc.No,G\Vl'4( /HO/G4/5480/1997-2025 dated 2)'tt7'2025 addressed to the Principal Secretary MA and UD, Hyderabad, Telangane, t ) pass appropriate orders to issu: Form-A exemptior a rd to enable the RDO, Hanamkonda tc isrsue the L.A. Notificarritn in Form VI and VII in the subject rral:ter and since the Government through G.O.Rt.No'lltl0 dated lB.:Il.2Cl24 l,ad sanctioned the compensation antortnt and even perrril:ted to pay the same to the petit orrer, the I I I \ \ 3 C.C. No. 833 of 2024 Contempt could be closed fixing a reasonable period for complying with the orders of this Court dated 18.07.2023 passed in W.p.No.15960 of 2023 since the same involves certain procedures to be stricUy followed.

6. Takin ln t co sideration: (a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, (b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on beharf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, (iia) The Letter dated ZO.OL.ZOZS vide Roc.No.cWMC/HO/c4/S4gO/tgg7_2}2s of Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal addressed to the principal Secretary, MA and UD, Hyderabad, Telangana filed by the 4th respondent in I.A.No.2 ot 2O2S in C.C.No.g33 of 2024 in W.p.No.tSg6O of 2028, (iv) The orders of this Court dated LB.O7.ZO2} passed in W.p.No.15960 ot 2O23, The Contempt Case is closed directing the respondents herein to compty with the orders of this \ 4 C.C. 'lo. 133 of 2024 Court dertecl L8.O7.2O23 passed in W.P.No. 1595O of 2023 wilhin a period of four (O4) weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. It is rpen to tlre petitioners to file ar fresh contemp,: cErse in the event the respondents failed to comply vrith the orders of this Court dated 1.8.01.2023 passed in W P.No.1596O of 2O23 within the time period as stipulatecl as above. Miscella reous petitions, if any pending, shal stand closed, //TRUE COPY// li\ SD/. N. SRIHARI \DEPI,|T'/ REGISTRAR St:CTION OFFICER I To, M

1. One CC to :iri V.M.M.Chary, Advocate (OPUC) 2. One CC to 'i" Pasham Mohit, S.C for Warangal 5 Two CCs to O.P for Revenue, High Court for the State of 4. Triro CCr;ld (;.P'for Roads and Buildings, High Court for th€ Slate of unicipal C or1.r (oPUc) larrgana at HYderab rdlr: UTI -f€ Telanga ra at Hyderabad[OUT].

5. Two CD Coo es Ks/gh ( f, lJ r\. c. t IA oA t! 6 i\rr\ ?s5 o .\ iL i.jj- + o -./- HIGH COUR]- DATED:25 t0412025 ORDER CC.No.833 ot 2024 Closing the contempt case Without costs. q r{l 1 b l) 7 L