High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ...RESPONDENTS ry / pleased to issue v/r;t order or direction more particularly one in the: nature of wRrr oF MANDAMUS di'ecting the respondents 2 to 7 to piovide er"crrility s,uppty to Registraticn-HT237s1346 for category HT-bz, Loao-rzri.otikvn,"i."stn "onneciion -0.06KM connecticr to the. Residentiar alitaing in H.No,13-23-z ano'e-,- irot 139, in Survey Nos.-10g, 110 and 1tr almeasuring |J9:119,^13.8_, 1433.51 Sq Yards r;ituated.at Shareef Nagai Colony, OaaOiannar;im, S;;;-o;;r, (M), Ranga Reddy District, f,9., boundld Oy Nirrtfr. ru"errs guitOing.-Sou1f,. Neighbours Prope{'l East. 30'wide Road. weit. yadamma ano rrtrersFroperty. without insisting Lrpc'n occupancy certificate from the gth respondent uy troroing that the refusar to pr()vide erectriiity connection to the above refe red premises is illegal and arbitra4r 137'(F,art) a.nd IANO:1OF2 025 Petition unde. section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, tne Higr, court may oei,[rr"o]" air".t the respondents 2 rc 7 to.91o-vide erectricity co-nnection suppry'6 n"gi.ir"ii".- HT2375^13.46 for caregory HT-02, Load-120.00KVA, t_ength _0 0Offr/ Cinnection to theResidentiar B.rirding.in-H.No.13-23-7 and 8, FIot r.]o. r+0, rgs, 13i'ipr.tl and 139, in Survey Nos..109, .l 10 and .l .li, admeasuring i43iI.S,l Sq VarOs, llj:l^"_a ?,.tnT::l N:rgar Cotony, Gaddiannaram, Saroornagar (M), Ranga Reddy ursr.cr, t.s., bourrded bI f,onh Neerus. B-uilding. South Neigh6ours -property. East' 30' wide Road west. yadamma and others"property without insisting upon occupancy certificat,-. from the gth respondent pending- drsposzrl ot main-i,urit petition and may de,enr fit and proper in the circumstance of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGY !91p_eltor the Resp,ondent No.2 to 7: SRt N. SREEDHAR REDDY SC FOR TGSPDCL

99.l11"t for the Respondent No.8: SRI SR|N|VASA RAO PACHWA SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER ,.r*tt: 1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.N o.10447 of 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposa_l at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is frled with the following prayer: "To issue writ, orcler or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, direcLing the respondent s 2 to 7 to provide electncity connection Supply to Registration 11123751346 for category HT_02 Load_ 120.00KVA, Length ,0.06KM Connection to the Resrdential Building in H.No.13-23-7 and 8, plot Nos.140, 13g, 137 (part) and 139 in Survey Nos. 109, l10 and llt admeasuring 1433.51 Sq yards situated at Shareef Nagar Colony, Gaddiannaram, Saroornagar M, Ranga Reddy District, T S, bounded by North: Neerus Building, South: Neighbours property, t ast: 30 Wide Road, West: Yadamma and Others propert5r without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the gth respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electncity connection to the above referred premises is ilegal and arbitrar/.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government pleader for Energy for respondent No. 1, Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSpDCL for respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri Srinivasa Rao pachwa, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.g and perused the record. I I 2

4. Today, when the matter is taken up' it is submitted by the learned cou.nse:l {br the petitioner that the issue raised ir:' the present writ petitiorr is s cluarely covered by the order d'ated 26'7 '2018 passed by this Court itr W.P.No'26085 of 2018' The same is rlot seriously disputed bl' the learned counsel appearing for the resporLdents In vieu o{ the above, for the reasons alike in the order dated 5. 26.7,2018 in rM.P.No.26085 of 2018, this writ petition il; disposed of directing the respondents to release power supply to tht: premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of terms and cc'nditions and on furnishing zl'n undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the cort<:t:rned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if r:o such occupancy certihcate is producecl within such period, it is ope:n to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance witlL law. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this rn rit petitic n stand closed SD/- P.PADEMANABH A EDDY STRAR I'TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 ThePrincipalsecretaryPowerandEnergyDepartmentSecretariat, Hyderabad-Ii00022' ;i.i*;3;6:ilf*liffslfl 3irs"J:i,'"?:["i+'5""xi6?i'5'i'v.1i?""??sB1x" I

3. The Chief Enginer

5. The Divisional Enc . . J:il,T""Jr,;;;,::;:Jfl"T::;i::L:il:il?::":'j;".* i Saroornigai' -',gtneer/operation/ Saroornagar Division, TGsp DC L, " I8".fBZJ: g:r; :i.;:Ui.,sineer/ operation/ sa rs6pnsr.r s ub _ Division ' IS"rABtstt:3,rF,1"?,i".n";1.. op / g61s61n3g ar t AE opsaroornasar, icipa r corporation, Rep. by the comm issioner, I i.gt-%"t'"*,Hffi5tSf#n 9, One CC to SRL TH, ,#;5fl'flHrg,i11ry*#itffi,a I ENERGY PSK *^arr.r*o cD copies (Along with the copy of the order date d 26.07 .2[18in W.pNO.2608S of 2018) 'High court for the state .r r"rr.,i"'i". rourr I HIGH COURT DATED:0810412025 I \ CCTODAY t I ORDER WP.No.10447 of 2025 ((( I, C) 3 {J 11 APn i[6 t c .. ^: ,:. ,-1.,-t * !) DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \t \* t\ -:) THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACIIANDRA RAO IIIRIT PETITION No.26 O85 of 2O1a ORDE R: Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for 4rh respondent.

2. It .is stated by iearnccl crrunsei appearing for the petitioner as rveli as Sn R.!.inocl ii.:riri).. Staacling counsel appearing for responclent Nos. I r.o J ihat the issue in ttris Writ Petition is covereil br. rhe older of this Court dt.23.O3.2018 in !V.p.No.9789 of 2018. 3. Therelore for reasons alike. thls Writ petition is also disposed of rvith a directioa ro the rcsponciears to release the power supp11.' to the premises of th_- petiLioner. subject to the compliance of the terms and conditions ald on furnishing al undertaking to produce the occupancy certihcate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in ac3ordance with law. There shall be no order as to 2 Consequt:nthr, tniscellaneous petitions pending' if any' 4 shall stand dismis se cL M.S.RAMACHAND RA RAO' J 26th JulY, 2O 18