The High Court · 2025

petitle11 qndsr Se9{l9n 151 qPg prqyil g thet in the circqmstances stated in the High Court maY be Pleased to the affida vit filed in supBort 9f the Pqtitian' direct the ReFpondents 2 to 7 tq B(oceEs the application qf the Petitioner tq provide for Q Domestic conneqti ong, lotal Pomestiq Contract Load gf 16000 watts' yide Rgg Nq,'l.TM !5633QP7Q to thp petitig4er, H NP ?-56tQ0 w9stern Part, in Survey No 11€5, a(meqsuring 1q?,9q yqt?:, sitqated at Chandra !{aik Thanda, poqqded hV 115qnsrngt, GH MO Serilingaqpally, Rangg Feddy District. T S North. Hougg belonging \q Ram ulu; gouth. Hou se belenging tp Amalsingh; E?81, Road; !J/es1. lleusq pelqngins ip Kisnqn ..: csunselfor (he Pptilionqq : S$l rl,t[PR F99P4 FIN9H coqnsel fot qhP RgFPotl$gnt $o'1 i 9f Fqq ENEEGY .cosnsqlroqggsoondenleNo,ltof 'tthgf ,..t35i8r0=o,t' Counsel for RespondenF No,8:SRl G'MAOHUSUDHAN REDDY' SC FOR GHMC The Cqurt r.r14{e thq fol[owinql OBDER .t: *i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.lO 428 0F 20.25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed, under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliet - "...to issue an dppropiate wit, ord.er or direction more particularlA one in the nahre of Writ of Manriamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not processtng the application of the petitioner to prouide- for g Domestic connection-s, total Domestic Cantract Load of 16000 utitts, uide Reg. N?.LTM25633OO76 to the petitioner, the H.No.2-56/ 30 Westem part, in Suruig No.11/25, admeasuing 135 sq. yards situdted at CLantlra Naik Tlandi, Yla:arn?t, GHMC Seilingampallg, Ranga Redd.g Di_stict, T.5., bourujed. bA North: House belanging to Ramulu; South: House belonging to Amarsingf Eas-t: Road; West: House betongrng to Kbhl:,n , o-s ilbgat, null, uoid., arbitriry and con-sequ.entlA direct the respondents ta process the appttcation and to release th.e indtuidual seruice cannection uithout being inJluenced by the in-sttudions of the Eh .espondent and to pass..."

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Energr for respondent No. 1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 7; arrd Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, Iearned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.8. \

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.9792 of 2023, dated 11.04.2O23, and requested I I 2 PK,J Wp LO+za 2025 this Court tc, pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also' The same is not seriously disputed by the learned Government Pleader as wr:ll as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents'

5. In vieu-ol'the above submissions and for the reasotrs alike in the order of this Court in W P.No.979 2 of 2023, dated 1 1 '04 '2023, this Writ Pctil.ion is disposed of directing the respo ndents to consider tht: application, dated O3.O4 .2025, submittcd by the petitioner, uide' Reg.No.LTM25633OO76, for providing 8 domestic connections, total domestic colrtract load of 16000 watts, to the petitioner's H.No.2-56/30 Western Part, in Survey No'11/25, admeasuringl 1 35 sq. yards situated at Chandra Naih Thanda, Khanamet, GHMC, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, trnrl pass appropriate orders, in accordance with 1aw, as expeditio,:s1y as possible, preferably within a period of two (2) weeks from l,he date of receipt of a copy of this order, sutrject to the petitioner rrLakjng necessary payment, as stipulated under the Electricity A,:t, 2OO3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal1 stand closed. There shall l>e no order as to costs To,

4. The $Uperi4tgpding Engirleet, Tglangana StaG Southern power Distribution qpmpahy LimiJed, lidvgrh sguilfa, Qbmgjiguda, 1Jy{erapgd. 5 The Dirliqion?i Fnginper, Operaliin Kondqpur TG6ppCL 0. T[e 4Ee1 Diyieionpl fnqigeer, Qperaligq [<orr{ap!l TcqppcL 7 lhe AFsistaFt Engineer, 6E/9P/GHYD figst AF Q{ Ailapqr TGSPDCL ptfg$j? ggrL F'eAter flyqg!'aqgq $un i.qipal QQrpQ!'alio1, F I! _e, I ,Qne eq Io q$f rF:f$KUE Rogf,+ srNefl, AdypcglF topUcl SentrngampflUy zale. .: I QgE b Sf FPF EryFRAyi 10 Lyvo "!ioh l1 Qne Fq t" Sll N.$BEED.!-IAB FFoqy, gc FgR fqSpDEL. Iopucl 12.Qne CP to $RI G.MSDHUSUDHAN REDOY, SC FoR GHMC. toPUcI {3 Tlro $P pon1gl Qeurt fqr the grare oJ relansana. [oUTl BPT BS rt- i HIGH COURT DATED:0710412025 t \ CC TODAY eI4TsEH1o c -,}. f, o O 9 APB M?5 ], c * Dr'. !i, ORDER WP.No.10428 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 'rdd' \4,- ar{t5