Gudala Narender v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus or appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No.4 and 5 in interfering with civil dispute between the petitioner and his partners and illeghlly pressuring the petitioner and his family members and compelling the petitioner to accept the liability for the entire loss sustained in the business as arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.'l to 5 particularly the Respondent No.4 and 5 not to get themselves involved in civil disputes regarding business of M/s Sri Saibaba Binny Modem Rice Mill, Nacharam of Wargal Mandal of the petitioner and his partners and not to compel the petitioner to take on liability for the entire loss sustained in the business of M/s Sri Saibaba Binny Modern Rice Mill at Nacharam village of Wargal Mandal, Siddipet district lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 not to compel the petitioner to take on liability of loss in the business of Sd Saibaba Binny Modern Rice Mill at Nacharam village of Wargal Mandal, Siddipet district pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. R LAXMINARASIMHA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 10: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. lO7O9 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Gbvernment Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofhcial respondents is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that there are inter se disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent Nos.6 to I0 herein, who are his business partners, regarding running of a rice mill in the name and style of 'M/s Sri Saibaba Binny Modern Rice Mill'; that in the running of the aforesaid business, loss has occurred; that respondent Nos.6 to lO by influencing the 3'd respondent, are coercing and harassing the petitioner and his family to take entire loss by himself, even though the business is carried in partnership; and that the 3.d respondent 2 rs thus involving/interfering in the aforesaid dispute. which action of the respondents it is contended as highly illegal ancl. arbitrary. 4. Per contra, learned Government pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 would submit that the 6h respondent in the present Writ petition had approached the 3.d respondent authority and submitted a dt.O2.Ol.2O2S, against the petitioner herein; that rvhile the enquiry rnto the aforesaid complaint is pending, the petitioner,s son had approached the respondents_authorities a complaint and gave agalnst the 66 respondent herein on 24.O3.2025; arrd that the authorities, on recciving the aforesaid complaint of the pedtioner,s son, have made a GD entry and caused enquiry into the same. 5. representation/complaint, Learned Government pleader lurther submits that except for the purpose of causing enquiry into the aforementioned complaints lodged against the petitioner as well as by the petitioner,s son, the are not interfering in the civil disputes nor respondents_authorities coercing the petitioner o. rhe aroresaid business, ;Xr': :; concerned with the running of the business or the loss sustained ;:;*:,,::"j:": therein. 6 The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home is taken on record 3 7 . Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made as above, and since, the respondents-authorities claim to have received complaint against the petitioner herein as well as the complaint made by the petitioner's son against the 6th respondent herein, this. Court rs of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed to conduct enquiry into the aforesaid complaints, and if the contents of the same warrant initiation of action, the authorities shall do so, strictly in accordance with law.

8. Subject to the above observation and direction, the Writ Pet"ition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

9. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// sD/-P CHiu|S#'HHSISHRA -(- \=tL-- - _-r sEctioNoFrtcEn To,

3. 4 5 The Principal Secretary'Home Department Secretariat' Hyderabad The Commissioner of Police' Siddipet' Siddipet district' an" SiddiPet district One CC to SRI' R LAXMINARASIMHA RAO Advocate IOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR HOME 'High of Police' Gouraram Police Station' Wargal Mandal' Court for the State of Telangana' [OUTI "ndo,nrpector Two CD CoPies 6 KKS LSW HIGH COURT DATED:1010412025 L (1o (\- w2 ;I,)\; 'i:; ORDER WP.No.10709 of 2025 1 i: l-4 :l\ .ti ):. s -\ \\ CO F\ il\ c: * il ,.,.'i ,.'l DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITTON WITHOUT COSTS .dPkb 1 fr+"