The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep, by Public Prosecutor' High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT y,x5lilL1H,f'^!:r?i:"$?','sH [",Ifl',l,Ei,?;'A?io,:B?J:"J.1"€:'"if"T'?" FirJui,ijgit rown, Suryairet District' ...RESPONDENTICOMPLAINANT PetitionunderSection52SofBNSS,playln-gthatinthe.circumstances the High Court may stated in the Memorand"n"ot bro'na" of Criminal .Petition' be pleased to Gluash tttt p'-o"etOingt in FIR'No'04/2025' dated 06 01'2025' on the file the ps. carioepriiilli-riup"1 oi"tri"t, against the petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 herein. 1 I a l.A. NO:1 oF 2025 Petition under Section- S2g of BNSS, /praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of cri;in;r petition, the High court may to Stay of ..a, further pro"u"Oinl"' in FIR.*o.O472OZS,- O"i"o * ^gt91"^qA 06 01 2025, on the fire tle fs Garidepari, s"uryapet District., against the 'r.i-p"roi"g petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 herein incruoing disposal of the Criminal petition. -siay "ir""i l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: 1 AND Mallela Nagajyothi, D/o. Mallela Kondal Rao, Aged about 27 years, Occ_ pvt Ely,j:#4ffi,^I:tiliTssJ"Jt,o"untur oGiiiciinFlFies"ntrv neiioins- ai " ...PETIT|ONER/RESPONDENT No.2/COMpLA|NANT tN t.A. trios. 2 & 3

1. The State of Telanoana. Rep, by public prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad. ...COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT 2 3 4 5 i.ff-q.!!lLlt1/,?:%9,'#"EH'1,il?":"ft i":'%H#r0ii8,J#T#r Mandal, Suryapet District. Sale Vijayalaxmi, D/o.Dharmaiah, .age-d about 22 years, Occ_ Student, R/o. Velidanda Viilage, Garidepatti Uaridai Sr.Vipit -olrffi Sale Yallamma @ yellamma, Wo. Salde Dharmaiah, aged about 44 vearc. Mandar, Suryapei 3g?;.1]"r'" Sale. Dharmaiah, S/o. Mukthaiall,.?9eg about 49 years, Occ_ Lorrv Driver Ryo. Vetidanda Vitrage, Garidepriii M5;Ja[-S-u,yr-p""i 5i"tri.t. wir;, R/o. veriainoa -Villigu,'t;ffill"rri ...PET|TIONERS/ACCUSED NoS.i ro 4 tN t.A. Nos. 2 & 3 Petition under Rute 359(6) R/w, Section 528 pf BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the com_promise petition, the High co,r'.t ,.v'0" pru.""o to permit the Petitioner/Respondent tto.zTDe-tacio-comf,rainant to ctrpSunoing the FlR.No.04/2025, dt.06.01.2025, U/sec.69, 318 (4), rie 1ty, ZSZ, ZS,tl<Zjitw I (5) of BNS. LA. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Rure 359(2) R/w. sections2S of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit and Joint Memo of conipromiie, tn" nigh court may be pleased to record the compromise in crl.p.No.4gz6ii'z.oas'i"o 91"^.1 .t!:_qrqceedings against the petitioners/Al to e+ in ffn.ruo.0ZOls, - -"' d1.06.01.2025, U/sec.69, 3iB (4), 118 (1), 352, 351 (2) rtw 31Sy orAruS. This Petition coming on for hearing' upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal pet't'on and upln hearing the argumen-ts-:t^:'' VENKATARAMANAIAH f, Rdvocate for the Petitioner and Sri' JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, Additional p'O'i" p'ot""utor' on behalf of the Respondent No'1 Srnt. MOGILI ANAVENI Advocate for the Respondent No'2 "nO The Court made the following: ORDER ..' / THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.2 AND30 F 2025 In/And CRIMINA L PETITIO N No.4826 oF 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal petition is filed under Section S2g of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ,BNSS, 2023,) seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners-accused Nos..1 to 4 in Crime No.4 of 2O2S on the file of the Garidepally police Station, Suryapet District.

2. The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.l to 4 in the crime case registered for the offences punishabre under Sections 69, 31g(4), 1 18(1), 352, 351(2) r/w 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhith a,2023.

3. Heard Mr.Venkatramanaiah.K, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr-Jithender Rao veeramaila, rearned Additionar pubric prosecutor, representing the respondent No.'l-state and Mr.Mogili Anaveni, Iearned counsel for the respondent No.2/de_facfo complainant.

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2/de-facfo complainant filed l.A.Nos.2 and 3 0f 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the setflement to quash the proceedings against the - petitioners/accused in Crime No.4 of ZO2S. 7 NT&/ IANos2andlaJ2025 ttf ati Cr/.l>.N0. 4826 al2025

5. This Court vide order dated 07'04'2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement' The Secrelary' High Court Legal servicescommittee,hassubmittedreportdatedls'04'2O2Sstatingthat the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlement/comPromlse'

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record'

7. Having considered the allegations' the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties' in the light of the dictums in Gran Singh v' Stafe of Punjab and anothe/ and Anit Mishrav. State of tJ'P'zi State of Madhya Pradesh v' Laxmi Narayan and other{. this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr'P'C't528 of BNSS' 2023' would be in the interest of justice. | 2012 (10) scc 303 'z 2024 INSC 189 i 2019 (s) scc 688 3 Ar]R/ IA.Not.2 aul 3 of 2025 itt/ and CrlP.No. 4826 o.f 2025 B. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequenfly, alr the proceedings in crime No.04 0f 2025 0n the fire of the Garidepary Police Station, Suryapet District, are hereby q.uashed against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4. 9 ln the above terms, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed l //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. SREENIVASA REDDY SIqTANT REGISTRAR ,/ \i.- $EcIoN oFFtcER , To, 1 2 3 4

5. b. The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Huzurnagar, Suryapet District. The Station House Officer, Garidepalli p.S., Suryapet District. One CC to SRl. VENKATARAMANATAH K Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Court for the State of Telangana One CC to Smt. MOGILI ANAVENI Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copies MKN/gh *P HIGH COURT DATED:08 tTil2\zs .; / 1.r!t; i,1 ::.. .t\ i..i. \ 0 5 AU6 2025 I * ' ./ -'.\i)/ s- tr,,.,t ' COIT,IMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2O2S IN/AND CRLP.No.4826 ot 2O2S ALLOWTNG THE tA Nos. 2 and 3 ot 2025 AND DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION JOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitioner/De_Facto_Complainant amicably setUed the dispute at the intervention of elders and well wishers and the family members and the ,unur nu, been compromised between them. Hence the both parties came to compromise in the above said in FIR.No.04/2025, dt.06.01.2025 ,l)/sec.69,318 (4), 118 (1), 3S2, 351 (2) r/w 3 (5) of BNS and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the iircumstances of the case.

74.P1''fXe' Petitioner/R2lCompla i ant h Petitioner/R2 Counsel for the Petitioner/Al I tar4r* Petitioner/A2 4 u;j*11 t"r"; Petitioner/A3 S, -L e-'a-L-! Petitioner/A4 3"dg l<, Counsel for the peiitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 Hyderabad, Dated: 03.04.2025