The High Court · 2025

... RespondenUPetitioner/Proposed Defendant No.3

2. M/s. Religare Finvest Limited, (Cune${y \nqrqag lndia Resurgance P'vt. Ltd) Havinq iti branch office at Flat No. 601 - A, B, C,6th Floor, ASTRAL HEIGHTS, 6- 3- 35212 & 3 Beside Shanbagh Hote{, Par{agufra Hyderabad - 5O0 034, Rep. by its authorized signatory

3. Mr. Deepal Mittal, S/o. Known to the Plaintiffs, Aged about Maiot:Occtpation Private Service, Arbitrator Office at Charnber trlo. 8l7,6th Floor Lawyers Bloc*, Sacket District Court New Delhi - 110 017. ... Respo ndentslDefendants (Respondent 2 and 3 remained ex- parte in the Suit - l,lo notioe isneessary) lA lrlO: I oF m23 .of all further proceedings in o. s. - Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support ot tne pelitio'n, itr" i]g'h borrt may be preased to grant stay oro"i fiqii!fi #f ,11',',11fl?31afli3f,fl ?;3i;iq"1'rffJ,gi:,:',i."".:X?$*::# Counsel for the petifioners: SRI P.VINAYAKA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents No.{: SRI V.SANTOSH pursuint to'tt 'tto.oooTzois above CRF'. " Counsel for the Respondent ilos,2 and 3:__ ctvtL REVISIoil PETITIO NO: I 339 of 23 Petitirrn under Aftide 227 0f the constitution of rndia, against the order made in l'A.No.18:l or 2022in o.s.No.559 of 2019 crated o6.o2.zo23on the fire of the court of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between: 025 'S;fi 1"1",':AXSi*SSRi".??;,ft tifi Ifl i:,#?8.#ff i":,:l5:,"1?o,."u"d; ' fi;T!;v,?3iifi3i,jg,f.t""#ir*ilfi [fd#%* abour 42 vears R/o prot AND ...petitioners/plaintiffs/Respondents 'ii'r"'[fl,"ffiu:iifr Park, t.ower paret, lvtumOai I aOO Oiil ffi:'fii,Fi:?'i:xi5"fJi:?T:x,ltJBaTi,Tt'# ' "*'*' '"-- -.#q q iiai *d.',oiir 't' 2 M,s R,3,isare ,,*o,ffi;::::, J:'"T:::;:"* navq,_,6 6ra;ii'r, A" il,r8 H#,Fi*"f i$Al? H E rc H rs, dt3s2n, { lry:iot $# nl-a n i Jt"i' ei ;,i a-ri,ttlr, ivoSlrt j0l 500 034 Rep. by its authorized si9na1e, ---' ' '-'-" ' 3 Mr' De'spar Mittar. s/o. lGoqr-to the praintifft, Aged about Major occuoation. -dih,Fi";iiffiffi: private service. Arbitrator. offG_ ar ,i#ff ffi: 647, Btock, tiacket Districi Court Hew-Oeri,i:'iiobi'z ''" ' Derendant No 3 ... Respondenb/ Defendants {Respondpnt 2 and 3 remained ex-parte in the Suit - No notice is necessary) Gounsel for the Petitioners:SRl. P VINAYAKA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.l : SRI V.SANTOSH Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3:-- Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the ffier and Decree made in 1.A.No.181 ot 2022 in O.S.No.559 of 2019 dated 06.02.2023 on the file of the court of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between:

1. G. Soma Sekhar Rao, S/o. G.Narayana Rao, Aged about 76 years Occupation- Business R/o. Plot No. 8'1/1, Old Marredpally Secunderabad - 500 026.

2. G. Aditya Ganapa, S/o. G. Soma Sekhar Rao, A99d about 42years R/o. Plot No. 81/i, Old M-arredpally Secunderabad - 500 026 ... Petitioners/PlaintiffslRes pondents AND

1. lvl/s. lndia Resurgence ARC Private Limited, Represented by its auttrorized signatory Office at grO Floor, Unit 304, Piramal Tower Peninsula Corporate Park, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400 013. ... Res pondenUPetitio ner/Proposed Defendant No.3

2. lrfls. Religare Finvest Limited, (Currently kno_wn as !n{ia Re-sglg:.lpe Pvt. Ltd) Having i6 brarrch office at Flat'No. 601 - A, B, C, 6th Floor ASTRAL HEGHTS, 6-T45A2 and 3 Beside Shanbagh Hotel, Panjagutta Hyderabad - 500 034, Rep. by its authorized signatory.

3. Mr. Deepal Mittal, S/o. Known to the Plaintiffs, AgqdSqoyt$ajo'rOccupation- Private Service, Arbitrator Office at Chamber No. 647, 6th Floor Lawyets Block, Sacket District Court New Delhi - 110 017. ..Res PondentslDefendads (Respondent 2 and 3 remained ex-parte in the Suit - No notice is necessary) lA NO: { C,F 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC pmying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O,S. No.559/2019 pursuant to the Order passed in l.A. No.181/2022, dated- 06-02-2023, pending above CRP on the file of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above CR[). Counsel for the Petitionos: SRI P, VINAYAKA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.l: V SANTOSH Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3:-- CIVIL REVISION PETMON IrlO: 1355 of 2023 Petition under Mide 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order and Decree ma,Je in 1.A.No.179 ot 2022 in O.S.No.600 of 2019 dated 06.02.2023 on the file of the court of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civit Court, Hyderabad. Between: 1 2 G. tloma Sekhar Rao, S/o. G. Narayana Rao, Aoed about 80 vears Occrrp-ation. Business R/ o. Plot No. 81/i, Old Maired-paily Secundera6ad - 500 026. 9 41!tyf g.qn-a-pa, S/o..G. Soma Sekhar Rao, Aged about 45 years R/o. ptot No. t|'ll1, Old Marredpally Secunderabad - 500 026. ...PetitioneE PlaintiffsrR6pondents 1, 2. AND 1 2 M/s. IndiaResurgepefRc Privale Limited, Represented by its authorized srgnatory Office a! 9( Flgo-r, V!r! 904, Piramal Tower penin3uta Corporate Park, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400 0'13. M/s. lleligare Finvest l:imited, (gur-e,nuy klown as lndia Resurgence pvt. Ltct) Having ib branch office at Flat No. 601 - A, B, C. 6th Ftoor ASTRAI !_E!GltlT9, 6-3-35?,2 and 3 Beside Shanbagh Hotet, panjagutta Hyderabad - 500 C,34 Rep. by its authorized signatory ...Respondents/Defendants

3. Mr. Ifeepal _Mittal, ^, S1o. (noqn to the Ptaintiffs, Aged Occuoation. Private Service, Arbifator Offce at Chamber No. Lawy,:rs 8lock, Sacket Disfict Court New Delhi - i i0 017. about Major 647, 6th Floor (Resoondent 2 and 3 remained ex+arte in the Suit - No notice is necessary) ...Respondents/Defendants Counset for the Petitioners: SRI P. VINAYAKA SWAMY Gounset for theRespondent No.{: SRI V. SANTOSH Gounsel for the Respgndent No.2 &3:-- The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER o TIIT HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSI'DHJIIT RAO COMMON ORDER: [iri, P.Vinayaka Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause does not survive in these Civil Flevision Petitirons, in view of the fact, that respondent No.1 has surrendered his license to Reserve Bank of India.

2. Flecording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thes,-- Civit Revision Petitions shall stand closed. SD'. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 ,,TRIJE COPY/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The l\t Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court Hyderabad. 2. One C;C to SRI P.VINAYAKA SWAMY Advocate TOPUCI 3. One C;C to SRI V.SANTOSH Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies NVB\PSL HIGH ISOURT 7,I.dfiElrl.f]B I tIE S 1 :, i ' 1111[ 1 6 t * 3 3 CRP.Nos.1303 l] 1340 and {355 of 2023 , CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS ARE DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS i ! i ! I I I I I I I I u J &