THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C v. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ more specifically in the nature of writ of mandamus, a. To deictare the action of the Respondent Authorities in incorrectly entering the name of the Respondent No. 6 in place of petitioner s father for an extent of land admeasuring Ac. 0-06 guntas in Sy. No. 18221 AA at Kosgi (v) (M), Narayanpet, Telangana as bad, arbitrary, illegal, violative of Article 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and b. Consequentially direct the Respondent authorities to enter/correct the record by entering the name of the petitioners mother for an extent of land admeasuring Ac. 0-07 guntas in Sy. No. 1822t AA al Kosgi (v) (M), Narayanpet, Telangana and issue pattadar and passbook. I t --r IA NO i 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities specifically Respondent No. 4 and 5 not to entertain any further registrations and, amendmenV mutation- the revenue record to an extent of Ac. 0-06 guntas in Sy. No. 18221 AA at Kosgi (v) (M), Naraypnpet, Telangana until the disposal of the present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.ANURAG Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the ResPondent No.6: -- The Court made the lollowing: ORDER --------7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1O439 of 2o25 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent authorities in incorrectly entering the name of respondent No.6 in place of petitioner's father in respect of land admeasuring ec.b.OO gts., in Sy.No. 1822/AA, siruated at Kosgi Village and Mandal, Narayanpet District, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently prayed for other appropriate reliefs.

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record.

3. It is stated that the petitioner's father was the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.0.07 gts., in Sy.No. 1822lAA, situated at Kosgi Viliage and Mandal, Narayanpet District and his name was recorded in the pahanies as pattadar and possesso.". it i" further stated that in the year 2O17, the name of respondent No.6 has been recorded in the pahani in place of the petitioner's father in respect of land admeasuring Ac.O.O6 gts, in Sy.No.1822/AA. Therefore, the petitioner has made a written representation dated 2O.Ol .2025 to the respondent authorities requesting to furnish information about the mutation of the name of respondent No.6 in the revenue records in respect of I I I 2 CVBR, J wp_10439_2025 Sy.No.1822/AA. In reply to the said representation, respondent No.4 has issued an Endorsement in File No.C I 125 /2O2S, dated O5.O2.2O25 stating that the land in Sy.No..1822/AA, covering an extent of Ac.O.17 gts., belongs to Kyasaram Ananthaiah, S/o. ehinnaiah and out of the said extent, Ac.O. 10 gts., of land has been granted under patta to Varla Swarupa Rani W/o. Bhalakrishnaiah, as per records. It is further stated that with regard to remaining Ac.0.O7 gts., no relevant patta transfer documents pertaining to mutation of the name of respondent No.6 in place of the petitioner's father in respect of Sy. No. lg22 / A, covering Ac.0.07 gts., have been found. The case of the petitioner is that no documents whatsoever were executed by his father during his lifetime and respondent No.6, in active collusion with the then revenue officials, got mutated his name in the revenue records in respect of Sy.No. 1822/AA and obtained pattadar passbook fraudulently.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehementlv contended that respondent No.6 is not holding any valid documents for transfer of patta in his favour as required under Section 4 of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar passbooks Act, 1971 and in the absence of the same, he is not entitled for mutation of his 3 CVBR, J wp_L0439 _2025 name in the revenue records and consequential issuance of pattadar passbook in respect of Sy.No. 1822 / AA.

5. A perusal of the Endorsement dated 05.O2.2025 issued by. respondent No.4 would reveal that no relevant patta transfer documents pertaining to mutation of the name of respondent No.6 in place of the petitioner's father in respect of Sy.No. lg22lA, covering Ac.0.07 gts., have been found.

6. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the issue raised in this writ petition has to be dealt with by respondent No.4, after conducting a detailed enquiry in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider the application, if any, filed by thp petitioner and after issuing notice to the petitioner and all other persons whose names have been recorded in the revenue records, conduct a detailed enquiry and pass appropriate orders, within a period of twelve (12) weekS from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII SD/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To srcrrohlrrrcen 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State I \ of Telangana.

2. The Office of Dist Collector, Narayanpet, Telangana- 509210. 3. The Office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kosgi (v) (lM), Narayanpet, Telangana- 50921O.

4. The Office of Tahsildar (Mandal Revenue Officer), Kosgi (v) (tr,/l), Narayanpet, Telangana- 509210.

5. The Office of Sub-Reqistrar, Naravanpet. I 9n" CC to SRt R.ANURAG, Advo'cate IOprJCt 7. Two CCs to Gp rOn neVeNUe, HGh'C;;;ar the State of Tetangana, at B. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] PSK GJP \ i HIGH COURT DATED:0710412025 \ ORDER WP.No.10439 of 2025 t t TEla o "9 b 94 t L i / .) u, t: '..'. I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I +l dlad