The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep' by Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana if, j;31l|iJ'&'.'EX[|'i]f ib6l",FAiliB,U'A*?:lY;'t"i'1ifi J331"'"*- CinOipet t'itinaal, Ranga Reddy District ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandu* ot'eiluna" oi Criminat-petltion, the High Court may be oleased to quash tne proceeailgl-in pnc-rlo 13612024 on the file of the Hon'ble liriniir.ilr;-.i"ioritrn i,rrsi.tt;ti Raiendranasar' cvberabad' Hvderabad' l.A. NO :1 OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandu, oi'O-,"o'nOt of C'i..nin'iettition' the High Court may be oleased to grant stay of all t"in!' pt*""Oings in PRC No 136t2024 on the file of i#;il,;E-ijri -Aaor. ru"ii"p"itt""- r'/las"istrate, Rajendranasar, cvberabad including personal appearance of the petitioner' l.A. Nos: 2 AND 3 oF 2025 l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Between: 1 Smt. Sathi Vijayalaxmi, Wo Late Ramchandra Reddy, Aoed 53 years, Occ_ House Wife, Rl/o Ftat No K 1601, PBHL CitV, F""ir"iiri"ilu Viilage, Gandipet lVtandat, Ranga Reddy bisl;i;t. - i, ' 'i vv'| u" '|v"e'| v ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Complainant AND 1 2 Sathi Vamshi Krishna Reddv, q/-o lqte Ramchandra Reddy, Aged 34 years, occ- pvt Job, R/o Ftar Nij. ( roor, iB'ii'Ciii, ilElramcnervu Vilase, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districtl ei iE v'Lr' ' sc The retangana ^State^of ... RespondenUpetitioner/Accused rerangana, Rep. by pubric prosecutor High court for the state of ...Respondent Petition under Section 320(6) Cr.pC R/W 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum or cro,nJs of criminar petition, the High c-ourt may be pleased to p_ermit tne petit,:oner to compound the offences U.Sec.307, 385.342 0f rpc, in pRC No. fi;6r2ntii;n-the fire of the Hon,bre Xrl Addl. Metropotitan Magistrate, Rajendranagar, ail;r;;r; Hyderabad. t.A. NO: 3 0F 2025 Petition under Section 320(2) Cr.pC RA/V 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandu, of Cio, i" of Criminal petition, the High court may be preased to recor-d tne comprom-ilel'nd quashing against the petitioner in pRC No. 1361202.4 ,i"-tn" iir" of the Hon,bre xilr Addr. Metropolitan IVlagistrate, Rajendranagar, CyUeiaUaJHyieraUaO "on."qr"nry This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Lingala Sudheer, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veerama'a, Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of Ms A. Satyavathi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 0F 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION No.4753 0F 2025 coMMO N ORDER ThisCriminalPetitionisfiledunderSection52SofBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for shorf BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in P'R'C' No' 136 of 2A24, on the file of the learned Xlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

2.ThepetitlonerissoleaccusecintheP.R.C.registeredforthe offences punishabte urrcei Sections 307, 385, 342 of the lndian Penal Cc,de, 1860. l-leai'd Mr. L.Sudheer, learned counsel for the petitioner' 3. lr,lr.Jlihender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing respondent No.1-State and Ms- A. Satyavathi, learned counsel for respondent No.2/de facfo complainant'

4.Pendingthispetition,thepartieshaveenteredintothecompromlse and, accordingly. they moved l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in P'R C No 136 of 2424 2 N7R./ I.l.Not.2 and 3 of 2025 ia/ and Cr/.P.No. 17 ij af 2025 5 This court vide order dated 21 .04.2025 referred the parties to the High court Legal Services committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the setflement. The secretary, High court Legar services committee, has submitted report dated zg.o4.2o2s stating that the parties were identified by their respective counser and arso on verification of Aadhar cards/rdentity cards and the enquiries reveared that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenVcomprom ise. 6 I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record 7 ' The accusations against the petitioner in the poiice Report are that on 15.06-2024 at about 3.00 AM, the petitioner/accused had attacked and stabbed his mother/de facfo comprainant on her stomach, right hand and right thigh with vegetable knife demanding money or transfer the property on his name. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable setflement between the mother/respondent No.2/de facro comprainant and son/petitioner/accused and to restore peace among them, in the light of the dictums in Gian singh v- sfate of punjab and anotherl and Anit Mishra v. state of I i | 2012 (1o) scc 303 :'...:1!1f ;1t aara},1.3,:,':-:, 3 ^,]&/ IA.Nm. 2 und ) o;f 2025 in/ and Crl.P-No- 475) of 2025 U.P.z; State of Madhya pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and oflrersr, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the setrement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.p.C.t528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of lustice. B. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequenfly, all proceedings in p.R.C. No. 136 o,f 2024 on the file of the learned Xlll Additional N/etropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused. o Resultantly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Pending miscellaneous applications,,if any, sh-all stand closed. SD/.B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Hyderabad (OUT) '1. The Xlll Additional lMekooolitan Jvlagistrate, Rajendranagar, Cyberabad. 2. rhe station House officer, N"r"id"p"i;;st)t1Inliv'o"r.ro"o 3. Two CCs to the public prosecutor, High Court for if,"dtrtl"Jri"rrngana at 1 9n" 99 to Sri Lingata Sudheer, Advocate IOpUCT -' 5. One CC to Ms. A. Satyavathi, AdvocaG iOiruCf 6. Two CD Copies @; 'z 202+ INsc t89 3 zore 1s1 scc ese HIGH COURT DATED: Ogl06l202s COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.4753 ot 2025 '(HE S14 (:) lutl1 2825 Itli (-1F ., . !,, ,.). .-,/- THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED q OI a