✦ High Court of India · 05 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Dec 2025
Length
2,183 words

addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial-f) High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, requesting I rat the case be referred to Lok Adalat for settlement. According;l r, tl-re case was referred to Lok Adalat

3. The Lok Adalat, after interacting with the parties, verified their identities, and ascertained their free arrd voluntary consent, has recorded a settlement between them. The Lok Adalat Award dated 14.06.2025, along with the Memorandum of Compromise signed by the parties, has been placed before this Court.

4. The Award certifies that the compromise is lau,ful, voluntarlz, artd free from coercion, undue influence, or misrepresentation. 5' This court has perused the Award and the terms of the settlement and finds no legal impediment to accept the same in terms of Order XXIII Rule 3 CpC.

6. In view of the compromise recorded by the Lok Adalat, this Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the settlement. There shall be no order as to All pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, sha_ll stald closed. d/. M.JAWAHAR REDDY SSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 J Y{ The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.cum- VtIl Additional District Judqe (FTC) at Warangal (With Records if any) b;;ai to-Sri Rla'y' Kr-imar- l',4adisett'v Advocate [oPUCj Two CD CoPies Award of Lok Adalat enclosed HIGH COURT VRKR, J DATED: 0511212025 I

6. .. il{ CJ.) 2 6 I t [26 2 i\ ( ) t JUDGMENT MACMA.No.1992 ot 2011 * Qt PN.I t DISPOSING OF MACMA IN TERMS OF THE LOK-ADALAT AWARD <rt fu,vo BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HICH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. lUnder Section l9 ol the t-egol Servtces Authorities Acl. I 987 (Cenkot Act)l Date:'t 4-06-2025 Present: 1 . Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, (Former Judge of Hon'bte Sigh Court for the Sr.te of Telangana) Chairman

2. Dr- J. Vijaya Lakshmj, Advocate, Member tsls1 m t M.A.C.M.A.No. 1 992 ot 2O17 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST d' M.V.O.P. No.1413 of 2009 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat- cum-Vlll Additionat District Judge at Warangat) Between:- 1. Nethavath Golrya, S/o.Bhandriya, aged 56 years, Occ: labour, 2. Nethavath Mangj, W/o.Gotiya, aged about 51 years, Occ: Labour, 5ERV I ef,o t3[ t the Slato I ,t I i I I Both are residents of Dubba Thanda, H/o. Maripeda vittage and Mandat, Presently residing at Labour Cotony, Warangal Ciry. AND ... Appellants/ petitioners

1. Banoth Lachya, S/o. Sakriya, Aged.15 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.6-278, Dubba Thanda, Maripeda Mandat, Warangat District.

2. ICICI Lombard GeneraI lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by rts Chief Manager, LegaI Ctaims, Himayathnagar, TTD Katyana Mandapam Road, Hyderabad.

3. Banoth Ramesh, S/o.Lachya, Occ: Driver, Aged Major, Occ: Driver, R/o.Nethavath Thandsa vittage, maripeda Bangtow Mandat, Warangat District. CounseI for the Appettants/Ctaimants CounseI for Respondent No.2/ lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company .., Respondents/Defendants Sri lvl.Ajay Kumar, Advocate/ Sri Shaik Rafi, Advocate Sri Mohammed AbduI Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legal Ctaims This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and also the parties, the fottowing award is AWARD Compensation A'*arded by the Tribunat Rs.3,75,000/- (Three [akhs seventy five thousand onty) together with interest @ 7 .5% P .A., from the date of petition titt the date of reatization. t) ComPensa Awarded (Selttement. Reached ) in the Lok Ad atat ' SEH (-) t ts,if&YF t slate ol 1 nGd by the A-PPtlI nt/Pelitioner This is an aPPea aggrieved by the Award passed b'' the Chai'man' o..ia.nt, Ctaims Tribunat-cum -Vlll Arj itional Dislrict J Warangal in MVOP No 1413 of 2009' Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer' Seri r Manager-Legat Ctaims for the ResPondent No'2'lnsurance :omPany nas aPPeared before the Lok Adatat and rePrese r .ed that the APPettant" Petitioner / Ctaimant Nos'1 &, 2 havt: appeared and identified before the District Legal Services / uthority, HanumakPnda' the APPettant/Petitioner During the PendencY of this APPeat' lnsurance ComPanY have Ot Nos.1 & 2 as wett as ResPondent N entered into a settlement and ir fursuance of the same' the Appettants i Peti tioners/Ctaim art have agrsed to recel\e Five takhs ontY) towarrls an amount of Rs 5 0o'000/' (Rupees ctaim and the Insu rance ful( and finat setltement of thei a ne towards fult and firat CompanY has agreed to PaY the s comPromtse is record ?d setLtement o{ the ctaim Accordin{'t and the case is settted before the 1'r k Adatat' ln view of the above said setttenr' nt' the Respondent No 2 lnsurance Company shatt deposit 'l 3 settted amount within a- i period of two (2) months from th3 date of receipt of copy of this Award. In the event of defal t or detay in making such I depos'it, the Appettants/ Petitione r /Ctaimants are entitted to ctaim interest as awarded by the'- ibunat' I I Ap Co portionmen mpensadon , if anY The aPPo rtionm /Ctaimant Nos.1 & 2shal determined bY the Tribun ent between Appe ttant TPetitioner t be maa ) as Per the aPPortionment at in MV( P No'1413 of 2009' c^- n:irt i Additional Direction(s): 1. The Appettants are entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in tl' s appeat' 2. The amount atready deposited by the rnsurance company if an\, ;hatt be given credit to' 3. soon after deposit ov *,e rnsurance company, the ApPettant/Petitioner/ctaimant Nos.1 &, 2 are permitted to withdraw the entire amount' ln token of consent tor the above setttement and awari the parties and their counsel this case stands disPosed of have signed this a\/ard in our presence ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the partr€s 1\ Ir\ :. g,1 t.?-$'Arao- \1qz- e.o(1- \i.'v'6R: r? o. \ 443 -r-ool tcA oNR PO T TI A il. CASE IJO;: ;: Appettant (s) Respon dent (s) (!) N< +\-'-'u- \k\ C"o\'Yq ' €,/- . soV,.'-..\-t'lt, . ao y..o * /P' i < .r\ \*t< o<a l- A-{\ / r-A"' - , ' .rI,-.:.'n l t.' \uy' /o '6-\ ,2"d,.- C.,'.('\'€ '*\g -i< - Cne,hercr \ .. - _ I ^.---t-^-vA o a-^gt]at<? r ^- t-_, L*L . GENERAL IN cosT cooE B R cog u ( o a AN o o o27 * ) LT'\, |.Cz-[\\ a.,r ")-\ Gdifr F --..3:St Counset for i\ ,".,-lt< .);'f,- Io..l4-> Lq "*- A.sl-- a-u y- 't^- +- P^Y-- C*JL " ]r )^/ \q CHHRN€ Cou nsel for the ResPondent (s) CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY DLSA lt{ t1€t* ge B B s RI t (J H\GH LOK Stat€ \< .r4 6.-l;arf1-.z I # .fr E J * { { :i ,} i ,l $ $ I { ,l ! i I I I ,i I I t n / / :@, CASE NO'!': ft A. c-'.\-')'A'No ' \r- V'o\. \ cn2- -zat4 .ro ' 1+13 l-q ' NR P T t (s) Resp rdent (s c I .l _ G> I I t I I i I I I I I ! I i I I i I I I I I i I 0 91 te,: i Ne \rr.-'v crl$n ' Ytr-fl url2. C*-\^'Y t\ FZ ,.-' 7* 6 .aLF L,.^J=6t.rv- - \>.^ U-r;G-"'^^ tc\ \.1"c i go \el J I t- rl ,'-q) 4 -t-=\SD Counsel for t - .,},(tt J- <>- -rr-4ry^ s\t- -(.1c-- Ga^ro-^r' \ L ..--'-' L- --J a c'''r y' <- --\w-r (o'!,\]- =u-1 . i I I ERAL INSUR o E A CE ')a ) ( ?2 =lE allo. Co unset f() the ResPondent (s) ( IAIRMAN/SECRETARY DLSA '\ r- Pp- Cr^.! % +-- 1J'2 CH lq hr :.I 5\ rneMbEK t$r NR.ME. o() t,' SER YiC sate d1 \ : ; t , / From COMP RoMISE M Date:2't-tO-2025 ICICI Lombard G Hyderabad. eneral [nsurance Conpany Limited, To, The Secretary, I lqll 9"r" Legal Services Co:nmirree i-1igh ( oun of Teian-qana. H yd erabad Dcar Srr \1aclant. Subrect. C-onllr nralion ;rrdi n Cont C l4l t200\) r o rni e [-clm s in i\'lA lL rs suhnliite(i thal rrc;hg ClarnraaL,s aad :hc lnsurarce Com A 199 ?/2017 ln r\'I1' P ..\ r \\'lrrx n al x ith r ard (o sc ttlem ent l)efore Nation al Lok Art alath pany in the subjecr claim 1.e., IlACMA t9g2.i2ot7 rn ivlVOp t4 I 3 ,2009 at Warsng3l dunng the pendency of the same have negotia(cd ard serrlcd lhe maner arnrcablv lor an am unt of Rs.5 ,00,000/- and the clalnarrts in lhc subject clarrn ,,vere appeared b efore the concemed DLSA at Warangal and cre identi{led and on perusal of the said Identification thc matter was recorded Befbre the N ational Lok Adaiat held on I 3 -09-2025 at the Hon,ble High Court ofTelanga na at Hyderabad The Respondent No.2 agrees to deposit the ageed amount ofRs.5,00.000/- in addition hc arready dcposited amount if any torvards fulr ard finar satisfaction of rhe settlc ment rn o CI! -)^ ,.| Respondcnt/s 4 /-1--> \.-- n --\-'. .\ ppe - [vrfi C f'-. ,' lttz- ,A\- qre5 iiddffil{ihllgP.as'u 4"5 Unl iiJe-Jd0dlfca-U9n Autiorit!' of I nd,a s,/o:4+. ro54 rc. r u.6-.61.50511i SIO: Bhedru dJrba lhanda [,laripeda. r,1€. rePa. \&ara.,! 3] Aldhra Pradosrr 506315' a 2379 243s 959s E EW .l:..,.:, 7 ..._.-t_-_----:A:i- qwrysy'- tffimBmEriridia -'i' ' 1o'16 dtl Nethavath GoLYe -o,ii d6 / 009 01/0111946 2379 243 o< eja"5 - )s-r's:5s xr*6 ,J , N.e Jt-'-'":'r-\\ ' I l,ti: €""\Y "-,^,v{*\-t& '\ -) 1' I I { j I I & & .?r- bEdWffiMlffiilfffrneo,4*- ,Uri6 nio4 Nerhavath Iv?ngl iDdn,16 1OOB 01/0rr1371 1 2 eJAe6 -.$a:"O5 S x>.gJ 5 t,. I l1 t (,. I t.ln 'ti . # I j i .:1 i, a -,-r--)<\ (-) \4- (. ,-s"j -7f ,a/- ^ti i l I I ,. i I i I I .i .:-- -- -.-rd"aa:......,_-. -. %ii. '@g@raqr.".s ',4:i' uilto[ffimnc&paoi6oary o''n,i,. Od)r3r. wzo, lc5, orul ooc srox. .1)05. i6.nrj uoqp6t 5o5lr5 Ma:pod!:Maaooda. wrran!; Addlelll wO.co.ya. dubne thanoa, And:b pfadeEh,508315 a B rEt ) wsflEF6$" +F8&tE$ry*uoi,' /,a ix,t. '15 / CC8 . 0l II'_!6' 2379 435 959 ca6"6 * .$arsr5S:ro6 j .-:+ /, , i? ":; A\- ,:ct6 i 3dmm596'tE}6s'd ,- - lqds.ld€hlifl€tron Aulhor,t' :' Ca -A . ): ia ) a:)i.r .' . . tt !a6l ) ,.!r . ,ea. t"rar leaa 'ia r.ca ,1, i ,r eGie(^ i'; '' 1379 2435 9595 a i F 'r{i ,{ ) I N)€jx^.t 1'[U\ \^1 G\"u"N1 "-Jd+s'\"\ -/4=-- (.-+ / l.\ \ u I l t \._ eiii:l' i- *s .- . i,! Nelhavaii f.tn9l iDd^ i16 I DOB 01/0lrl97r t I 't/, / 1 7 1531 era"6 - )SJ"Sr5S ;rSr5 llii-r' ri,d.{rr.--- a- @IEME{6s"+ '|IffioilrofiV.orlndra VZTT: ua6 W/O: fr!tr, cJaJ ood, i)oL. .)165< rdoiJ 006 iFl. tC5l!5 w/O' Gcly6. dubD, lh8.Ce, Marip66a Manpoda. Walan!al A.dhra Prod6.h. 506315 t t I I I I ,t a 5197 39 B @r "i !.r fil.I ? 'l! i J --!v\ \a.* a) # ,/ t\ \ -)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments