Karnakota Srinivas v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pteased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus and declaring the action of the respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 in issuing Revocation Letter vide Lr. No.476498lGHMCl145Ol2025 dated 2410312025 to lhe Buitding permission of the petitioner vkle permit No.476498/1 136/GHMC{2O25 da6d 101o2t2025 and direct to cons'rJer the petitioner application for buihing permission as observed in order wP.No.33378/2O23 dated 1111212023, as being illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14,21 and 3o0-A of Constitution of lndia and corisequenly set aside the above the Revocation Letter vide Lr. No.476498/cHMC11 SO1ZO2S dated 2443-2025 issued by respondents 2, 3 and 4 and to process the Building permit M.476498/1136/GHMCl2025 dated 1o10212025 of the petitioner by collecting the refunded arnount and issue work permit order in r".p""i of ptot N;.1840 Southem Part, in Survey Nos.85,86,87 and 88 Parts, . admeasuring 150 sq. yards, situated at Kondapur (v), Serilingampally (M), U_nder 6HMC, Rariga Reddy bistrict, T.S., and bounded by North. Remaining Part of Plot No.1846 South. Plot No.1845 East. Plot No.1B47 West. 3)'Feet Wide Road., without insisting ULC Clearance Certificate lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the cir:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Revocation Letter vide Lr. No.476498/GHlACl1450l2O25 dated 24-03-2025 by directing the respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 to process the Building permit No.476498/1 1 36/GHMC|2025 dated 10-02-2025 by c< llecting the refunded amount and issue work permit order in respect of Plot No.1t 46 Southem Part, in Survey Nos.85,86, 87 and 88 Parts, admeasuring 150 51. yards, situated at Kondapur (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Recdy District, T.S., and bounded by North. Remaining Part of Plot No.1846; South. Pk t No.1845; East. Plot No.1847; West. 30' Feet Wide Road., without insisting ULC Cl,..arance Certificate lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue (U.L.C) Department, Secretariat Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND

3. Kamakota Srinivas, S/o. K. Jahangir, Age. 49 Years Ocr;. Business, Rl/o. Plot No.'|846 Southem Part, Survey Nos.BS, 86, 87 and 88 Parts, Kondapur (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S. , The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by it; Commissioner, Tank Bund Hyderabad. ...RESPOI.IDENT/PENTONER The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by Deputy Commissioner, Ci.cle No.20. GHMC, Serilingampally Zor e, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Asst. City Planner, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Rertdy District, Telangana Petition under Se:tion 151 CPC praying that in the circ umstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppr:rt of the petition, the High Court may te pleased to vacate the interim orders granted by the Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad in l.A. No.1 o( 2O25, dt.08.04.2025 and dismir;s the Writ Petition No.10234 of 2025 as devoid of merits, in the interest of justice ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.'t: cP FOR ASSIGNMENT Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.2,3&4: SR! G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY SC FOR GHMG The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI B. VIJAYSEN FEDDY 'USTICE WRIT PETITION o.1O234 of 2lJ25 ORDER: Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for :he petitioner, submitted that pursuant to the order passed by thi; Court dated

08.04.2025, building permission has been granted to the petitioner and as such, the cause in the writ petition does n )t survive for further adjudication.

2. Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned standin; counsel for GHMC, submitted that substantive writ petitions viz. WP.No.18768 of 2011 and WP.No.26830 of 2007 challenging th( proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, \ t are pending adjudication before this Court and construction undertaken by the petitioner is subject to the result o the said writ petitions, He further submitted that the petitioner slrall not claim any equities in case the aforesaid two writ petition: filed by the I ( original owners/declarants are dismissed.

3. In view of the above, considering that buildir g permission has been granted to the petitioner pursuant to the order dated

08.04.2025 passed by this Court, the writ petition i:i disposed of making it clear that the construction undertaken by rhe petitioner 2 shall be subject to ttrc outcome of WP.No.1B768 of 2011 and WP.No.26B30 of 2OO7. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. / , SD/. VIJAYA LAKSHMI s TANT REG]STRAR //TRUE COPYII CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary Revenue (U.L.C) Department, Secrctariat Hyderabad 2. Ihq Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Hyderabad.

3. The^Deputy_Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No.20, GHMC, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Asst. City Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District.

5. One CC to Smt THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Advocate [OPUC] . One CC to SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY SC FORGHMC [OPUC] 6 . Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT ,High Court for the State of Telangana. 7 . Two CD Copies 8 KKS KKS HIGH COURT ,DATED:0110812025 c (,,. \ 20 (rP 2m a). '' .// ,j' ORDER WP.No.10234 ot 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS li I dqltx-