The High Court · 2025

Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Notices Nos. 8/37012023, dt. 8l03l2025and 28103t2025 issued try rhe 4th Respondent issued by the 4th Respondent pending disposal of the presen: Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitian, the High Court may be pleased to direct the ResponrJents to not to interfere the day:to-day activities of the petitioners Brick Manufacturing unit situated admeasuring Ac. 2.116 Gts. in 6y Nd. 437124, 437lzljt1, 437t26 of Narsingpur Village, Jagityal(Rural), Jagityal District pending disposal of the present Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SAI SUMED YASASWI KONDAPAI.LI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI H.SOMAIAH EZRA SASTRI, AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Cqurt made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9975 of2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is fi1ed praying thii Court to declare the Notices, dated 18.03.2025 and, 28.03.2025 uide No.B/3ZO/ 2023, issued by respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently, prayed to direct the respondents not to interlere with lhe day_ to-day activities of the petitioner,s Bick Manufacturing Unit situated in the land admeasuring Acs.2.05 guntas in Sy.No.437 /24, 437 /25/t, 432 /26 of Narsingpur Village, Jagityal Rural Mandal, Jagityal District.

2. It is stated that respondent No.4 has issued the impugned notices to the petitioner under the provisions of the Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 7977 (for short "the Act, 1977"1 and the Rules made thereunder and the petitioner received the impugned notices on 2g.O3.2O25. The grievance of the petitioner is that even before submission of the explanation the respondent authorities are making efforts to dispossess him from the subject land, which is in his occupation. i t \ ;t 2 CVI}R, J \\p 9975 2025

3. Conr;idered the submissions of the learned counsiel for the respective pa rtics and with their consent, this writ J etition is disposed of .rt the admission stage.

4. Sri FI.Somarah Ezra Sastri, learned Assistant Go.izernment Pleader for Assignment, has submitted that a detailerl enquiry has been conducted by respondent No.4 over the lands in Sy.No.437 z nd its sub-divisions, wherein the assignees, who / alleged to htve assigned the land for agricultural purpose, are utilizing tltc said land otherthan the agricultural purpose, thereforc pro::eedings have been initiated under the F,rovisions of the Act., 1')77. Learned Assistant Government Pleadr:r further submitleri tJrrlt some of the assignees have filed a wri pctition before ll-ris OturL uide W.P.No.9856 of 2025 and this Court by an order, da:t:d O2.O4.2025, disposed of the same perm itting the petitioners t.rerein to hle an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Oflicer, within a period of two (O2) weeks lrom the date of receil): of a copy of the said order.

5. Be th:rr- :rs it may, in this writ petition the irnpugned orders are () nly show-cause notices. It is settled larv that against thr show-cause notices, writ petition is not maintainable and the petitioner is entitled to hle aporopriate 7 3 C\,'BR. J wp 9975 2025 explanation and after passing orders, he has right to agitate his grievance before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to di-spose of this writ petition, leaving it open to the petitioner to submit appropriate explanation to the impugned show-cause notices within a period of (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such explanation being submitted by the petitioner, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and pass an appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law and comlnunicate the same to the petitioner, within a period of four (Q4) weeks from the date of receipt of the explanation.

6. With the above observations, this Writ petition is disposed of. .There shatl be no order as to costs. 7 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.T. JAYASREE EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, . \ \ of Telangana. '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat' Hyderabad, State 2. The Distiict Collector, JagityalDistrict, Telangana. i. The Revenue Divisional flfficer, Jagityal(Ruial), JagityalDistrict, Telangana. 4. The Mandat Revenue Officer, Jagityai (Rural), Jagityal District, Telangan-a' S On. CC to SRI SAI SUMED YAS;ASWI KONDAPALLI, AdVOCAIE IOPUC] 6. iwo CCi t. Cp FOR ASSI6NMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana at 7. T. wo CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BSR BS s HIGH COURT DATED:0310412025 *' ORDER WP.No.9975 of 2025 HEsrrr (' \ o( /J o 1 5 APf, 2II25 I O5 SPATC'1 z a ,+ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 3 coq" ML- "-'rdt4\t' 2!o