The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS 'directing the respondents 2 to 7 to provide electricity ".'7 ,/ '. . connectron LT Sucpry to 3Nos. s-0 each 2KW Domestic roads irr addition to the existinq 3Nos-'1-o each 1KW Domestic road under Sc. Nos.6227 00.164,.r65,166, and lNo 3-O each 5KW Non_Domestic under SC. No.6227 OOg7, thus making a total load of 14KtN connection to the Residentiar Buirding in Frot No.191, in Survey No 292, admeasuring 196 sq. yards., situated at Lecturers corony, Bagh Hayathnagar, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy, District, T.s., bounded by North. prot No.192, South. pr.t r\o.190, East. prot No.175, west. 25'ft. wide Road. without insisting upon occ,.rp rncy certificate from the gth respondent by trording that the refusar to provide erec1l;6;1y connection to the above referred premises is ilegal and arbitrary IANO: 1OF2 02s Petition under i'iection 151 cpc praying that in the circumstilnces stated in the affidavit fired i, r;upport of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondentrs 2 ro 7 to provide electricity connection LT Suppry to 3Nos. s-0 each 2KW Do"nerstic roads in additiorr to the existing 3Nos.1-0 each 1KW Domestic load under Sc. Nos:6227 00164,165,166, and 1No 3_0 each 5KW Non_ Domestic under SC ro 6227 00g7, thus making a totar road of :14t<.w connection to the Residential Llu lding in plot No.191, In Survey No.292, admeasuring 196 Sq. Yards., situated at Lecturers Colony, Bagh Hayathnagar, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North: plot No.192; South: plot No.190; East: Plot No.'l 75; West: 25, ft. Wide Road. Without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the gth respondent pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner : SRI THAKUR ROOPA STNGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR ENERGY Counsel for Responde,nts No.2to7: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TSSPDCL Counsel for Respondents No.8 : SRI p.SRINIVASA RAO, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the fo[owing: ORDER w 1, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK w.P.No.9898 of 2o25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this ivrit petition is taken up for disposa,l at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is frled with the following prayer: "To issue writ, ord.er or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents 2 to 7 to provide electricity connection LT Supply to 3Nos S-O each 2KW Domestic loads in addition to the edsting 3Nos 1-O each 1KW Domestic load under SC Nos'6227 00164, 165' 166 andlNo3-oeachSKWNon-DomesticunderSCNo622Too9Tthusmakinga tota-l load of 14KW Connection to the Residential Building in Plot No 191 in Survey No 292 admeasuring 196 Sq Yards situated at Irctureis Colony' Bagh Hayathnagar, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, T S, bounded by North: Plot No.192, South: Plot No 190, East: Plot No 175, West: 25 ft Wide Road wilhout insisting upon occupancy certifrcate from t1.e Sth respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection to the above referred premises is illegal and arbitra4/. t \

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energ' for respondent No'1, Sri N'Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos'2 to 7 and Sri P.Srinivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.8 and perused the record. \ 2

4. Today, when the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised in the present \^,rit l)etition is squarely covered by the order dated 26.7.2o78 passed by this court in w.p.No.260gs of 20 Lg. The same is not seriousl5 disputed by the learned counsel apperaring for the respondents

5. In vierv,tf the above, for the reasons alike in the serid order, this writ petition i's ctisposed of directing the respondents to release power supply to the premises of the petitioners subject to the compriance of terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupalc,r <rertificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a pres,:ribed period, and if no such occupancy certiflcate is produced withir.: such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with law. Miscellaneous applications, ir'any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// ,\AP r )\, SD/. A,SRINIVASA REDDY SISTANT REGISTRA I SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal. secretary,_power and Energy Department secretariat, state of I etangana. tl y( terabad-500022.

2. The chairman iand Managing Director, southern power Distribution comoanv of Telangang-Qtate Ltd, h-aving its Corporate office at O_i Sn, U,i.i i"rp,i,lri, Hyderabad 500063. Hyderabad

3. The Chief General Manager, commercial Mint Compound T G S p DC L, 4 Il-"^9yt^"l,ltending Engineer, Operation/ Saroornagar Circle TGSpDC L, S J!9_llyigronat Engineer, Operation/ Saroornagar Division TGSp DC L, Saroornagar saroornagar. t/ w It)

6. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation/ Hayathnagar Sub - Division TGSP DC L, Saroornagar

7. The As.sistant Engineer, SE OP / Saroornagar / AE OP Hayathnagar, TGSp DC L, Saroornagar 8- The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad tt/unicipal Corporation, Hayath Nagar Circle 3, LB Nagar Zone.

9. One CC to SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate. [OPUC] 10. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Tetangana. [OUT] 'I 1.One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCLffRANSCO. loPUCl

12.One CC to SRI P.SRINIVASA RAO, SC FOR GHMC. [OPUC] 13. Two CD Copies. (Along with the copy of order dated 26.07.2018, in W.P.No.26085 of 2018) BSK &- i I \ HIGH COURT DATED:0210412025 CC TODAY \ ORDER WP.No.9898 of 2025 y1e Slr11 (- -) i) ! I APn 2025 o( v z a i i :i- a,,. -; ', .'L-') :' -;;;, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 7$ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO wRIT PETITION No.26O85 of 2O18 ORDER: Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R, Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents I to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for 4rr, respondent.

2. It is st.r1c(L by lealnecl counsel nppeirrirrg lbr the petitior-icr as rr,'ell as Sri R.Vinocl llr:dd1', Stanrlir.rg counsel appearing lbr responder-rt Nos.1 to i that the issue in this Writ f'etilion is covered by the order ol tliis Court dt.23.03.2018 in W.P.No.9789 of 2018

3. Thercfore for redsons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of rvith ;r drrection to the responclents to release the power suppll. to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of the terms ancl conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certihcate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to 2 /

4. Consequenlllr, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stancl disrnis sed. 26'tr July, 20 18 M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J