The Municipal Corporation of Vijayawada, rep., by its Commissioner, Vijayawada v. Parekate Sudhakar
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 5172, 5187, 5188 AND 5189 OF 2009 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the revision petitions has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 29-10-2011 A. GOPAL REDDY, J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision Petition No. 5172 of 2009).
← Search more judgments