High Court · 2025

4 [\4/s. lra Square Township LLP.,, Rep., by its Designated Partner Sri. Posham Narsi ReddyS/o. Sri. Posham Venkat Reddy Office at House No. 4-4912, Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet [/andal, Ranga Reddy District and also at R/o. Villa No.9, Eden Gardens, Kokapet, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ...RESPONDENTS I l I l i I I pleased to issue writ or order or direction, more so in the nature of Writ of [\/andamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking steps from removing the property i.e., lands admeasuring Ac.04-00 grts., situated at Sy. No. 61, of Kongarkalan village, lbrahimpatnam l\ilandal, Ranga Reddy District, without fulfilling the conditions mentioned under the orders passed in CI\ilA 318 of 2024 by this Hon'ble court, inspite of representation dated 27.03-2025 is absolutely arbitrary, illegal, high handed and violative of provisior)s of Registration act, violative of the orders of the Hon'ble court in CMA 318 ot 2()24, apart from violative of Articles 14, 21 , 300-A of Constitutron of lndia and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to remove the property from thr-. prohibitory list till the satisfaction orders are passed by the Hon'ble Civil Court as directed by this Hon'ble Court in CMA 318 of 2024 dated 21-03-2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the ,;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herern to not to remove or de list the property i.e., lands admeasuring Ac. 04-00 gts., situated at Sy' No. 61, cf Kongarkalan village, lbrahimpatnam Ir/andal, Ranga Reddy District, from the prohibitory list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act. Counsel for the Petitioners :SRl. G KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent NO 1 TO 3 : GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent NO 4:------- The Court made the following: ORDER 4,Y THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.9861 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for officia-l respondents and learned counsel for the unofhcial respondent No.4 and perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is filed by the petitioner declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in taking steps from removing the property i.e., lands admeasuring to an extent of Ac.04- 00 guntas situated at Sy.No.61, of Kongarkalan Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without fulfilling the conditions mentioned under the orders passed in CMA.No.318 of 2024 by this Court in spite of representation dated 27.03.2025 as absolutely arbitrary, illegal, high handed and violative of provisions of Registration Act, violative of the orders of this court in CMA.No.318 of 2024, apart from violative of Articles 14, 21, .) SK, J W.P.No.9a61 of 2O2S 4, 30o-A of constitution of India and consequentry direct the respondent Nos.2 ald 3 not to remove the property from the prohibitory list till the satisfaction orders are passed by the Civil Court as directed by this Court in CMA.No.3lg of 2024 dated 21.O3.2O25.

3. The operative portion tn CMA.No.31,3 of 2024 is as follows "2 1 . In the said ctrcumstances, what is stiking the conscious of this Bench is to strike a balanca so that the interest of both the parties stand" protectecl. In terms oJ. the MoU, the balance of ambunt payable by the appellants to respondenl lfos. J to 4 u cts amount pagable 6,00,00,000/ -. Notu in case if the inteim protection is continued, the appeLlants tuiit be put to substantial loss financiallg as that coulc.t d.elog the project nanrring fi.nancial implications. Ir case, the inteim stag is uacated., the respondent Nos.. to 4 u_toulcl be put to considerable detiment upon the appellants alienating the suit sched.ule propertA and- receiuing sale consideration upon each alienation. TLtere,.ore, in the opinion of this Bench and in the larger ;nterests oJ justice, it would be appropiate if the interim stag so far as restraint from alienating the suit schedule propertg is ordered to be uacated. subject to the appellants prouiding soluent seanitg to the satisfactio,l of the XI Additional Chief Judge, Citg Ciuil Courts, ){uderabad,, for an amount of Rs.6,OO, OO,OOO/ - and pennitting the appellants herein to carry out the deuelopment actiuities. "

4. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4, on oral instructions, submits that after complying the direction passed by this Court in CMA.No.318 of 2024, the respondent No.4 approached the competent authorities to take steps for deleting thb properties from prohibited list

5. In view of the submissions made by the both sides, the writ petition 1S disposed of directing the registering authorities without complying the orders of this Court in CMA.No.318 of 2024, not to take any steps for removing the schedule properties from the p;ohibited list. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.V.KAVITHA DEPUTY REGISTRAR W" SEC FFICER To

1. The Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, The State of Telangana.

2. The Sub Registrar,, Sub Registrar Office, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy Dist!'ict.

3. The District Registrar,, Ranga Reddy District. 4. One CC to SRl. c KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION ,High Court for the U State of Telangana. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies D **.'."'*"-"**;rl*ilil! t HIGH COURT DATED:1510412025 I -.--a'a:-"-' 111L r.\ r o\. 10 sE'] 20ffi ,./y * / -. - t-" r .../ l- i-'4 T ORDER WP.No.9861 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION VVITHOUT COSTS t\ a