High Court · 2025

Judgment

7. o.

9. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Hyderabad. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate, L.B.Nagar Division, Ranga Reddy District. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vanasthalipuram Circle, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy Distrlct. The Station House Officer, Vanasthalipuram Folice Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District.

Hero Fincorp Private Limited, Rep. by its Competent Authority, 0/0. Mr. Rajib Se, A-44, Mohan Cooperative lndustrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi - 110044. Aditya Birla Capital Private Limited, Rep. by its Competent Authority, O/o. the Corporate Qffice . One lndiabulls Center, Tower-1, lBth Floor, Jupiter Mill Compound 841 , Senapati Bapat [/arg, Elphistone Road, Mumbai, Pin- 400013. Tata Capital Private Limited, Rep. by its Competent Authority, O/o. 3, 4, Auto Plaza, S and 6, Venkateshwara Hills Lane, Opp. VST Colony,-North H Block, Journalist Colony, Opp. Chutneys, Punjagutta, Hyderabad - 82. 10 Kotak Mahindra Bank Private Limited, Rep. by its Competent Authority, O/o. the Regional Office. Jewel Pawani Towers, 631109111PG2, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, Pin-500082 (Credit Card). '1 1. HDFC Bank Private Limited,_Rep by its Competent Authority, O,,o. the Regional Office. The HDFC Bank, Secretariat Junction Branch k.,cated at No.5l9l22/A and 5l9l22l1lB, Above Nexa Showroom, Shapoorji --owers, Shapoorwadi, Adarsh [\sgsp, Hyderabad, Telangana pin - S00bfi3. 12.Toyola Financial Services lndia Limited, Rep. by its Competent t\uthoritv. O/o the No.21, Vaswani Centropolis, First Floor, Sth- Cross, Lingford Road, '' - - Shanthi Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka - 560025 ...RESPONDENTS p'etition und6r Article 226 of the constitution of lndia prayin g that in the circumstances stat'ed in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hrgh'c,iurt may oe pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particula 1y one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Responrient No.6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the Petitioner and also interfering into the civil disputes between th_e Petitioner and Respondent Nos.7 to 1:z and c;lling the Petitioner to the Police station and threatening to settle the disprute with the Respondent Nos.7 to 12 and threatening to pay the E.M.ls to them without having any jurisdiction and locus standi is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona I and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.6 for not interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and not to threaten the Petitioner to settle the dispute with the Respondent Nos. 7 to 12 an(l protect the Petitioner and his life lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15.1 CPC praying th at in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hig h Court may be plear;ed to direct the Respondent No.6 for not interfere into the peaceful life and liherty of the Petitioner and not to threaten the Petitioner to settle the dispule with the Respondent Nos. 7 to 12 and protect the Petitioner and his life pendingr disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to 12: -- The Court made the following: ORDER ,/ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 9954 of 2o25 OR DER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner' learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondent Nos.lto6,andwiththeconsentofthelearnedcounselappearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage'

2. Having regard to the manner of disposai of the Writ Petition and the nature of lis rnvolved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofhcial respondent Nos T to 12 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition'

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the respondents- authoritiesareinterferingwiththepeacefullifeandlibertyofthe petitioner by calling him to the police station and threatening him to pay EMI dues to the unofficial respondents herein and also to settle the outstanding payments to the said respondents' without registering any case against the petitioner, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as highly illegal' arbitrary' unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300A of the Constitution oI I ndia ' t t 2 l

4. Per contra, learned Government pleader appearing rn beha_lf of respondent Nor;.1 to 6 would submit that as of date no c.omplaint has been receivt:<I against the petitioner from any of the ,tnofhcial respondents; arcl that the authorities are in no way interfering with the life anrl personal liberty of the petitioner, muct, Iess for the recovery of r he amounts due to the unofficial respon dents as contended by thr: petitioner.

5. The aforesaid submission made by the learneC Government Pleader for Home, is taken on record.

6. Having regard to the submissions made as abovc. atrd since, it is stated that iis of date no complaint has been receivec against the petitioner fronr any of the unofhcial respondents, this Court is of the vier,,' that rtre respondents-authorities are to be dire,:ted not to interfere with the personal lile and liberty of Lhc pr titioner, except in accordarce with law. 7 Subject to tl-re above direction, the Writ petition rs clisposed of. No order as trt costs 8 Consequenrly, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendirrg shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// D i\ I SD/.A.V,S.PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR \s ECTION OFFICER \l t.../ The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building Secretariat, Hyderabad. \ I To, 1

2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad' 3. The commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, Rachakonda commii;sionerate, Hyderabad. \.r0 i.b.rlrgurbivision, Ranga Reddy District' 4 Trre Deoutv Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate' ' 5. The Assistant commissioner of Police, Vanasthalipuram circle' Rachakonda -' 6. The Station House Officer, Vanasthalipuram Police Station' Rachakonda -' Commissionerate' Ranga Reddy District' Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District'

7. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP FbR HON/E ,High Court for the State of Telangana' [OUT] s. Two CD CoPies KKS GJP Afl- HIGH COURT DATE D:0 310412025 ORDER WP.No.9954 of 2025 I I IHE S r.r 14 1 0 APn 20it $ 2 a 7 o 7. ,o, * f)C9r. --_-:i a I.T C 'rtio --;t'- DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ q\uV .< $r\. I