The High Court · 2025

Petition unrlsr gs61;6. .l5i CpC praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the responrlents 2 to I to prsvide elegtricity Supply to liegistratjon_ for Category -HT-02 l-oad -609 00KVA, l_elgth _0 6OK[/ ConneQtion to the CoryrmeJcial Buitding in Survey Nq, zOlR 4dmeasgr;ag Ac 0103 3gO Gts., or 400 Sq. Yards, situated at Bamaahandra puram Town. Ramactrandra puram (M), Salgareddy Distrrct, T,S., heunded by Ngrth Remaining Land of Vend919; South. Lanfl of Vendees; East Remaining Land of Vendors: West Land of Vendees. Without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the ;r; ,".;;;;r;, pending dispogat of main W(it petitjon aDd may deern fjt anO proper in lhe circum$lance Sf thq ease, Counsel for lhe petttioners: gl,tT THAKUR RgOpA STNGH Counsq! forlhe ResponCgnt 11e.1, Gp FOR ENEBGY Coqnsgf foglfe Respon{ent f{o.2 4 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC F9R TGSPDCL Caunsq! fot the Respondent No.4; sBt G^.|VTADHUSUDHAN BEDDY, 5C FOR GHMC The CqVrt mede the foflowing: ORDER 1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTIIIK 9830 of2 025 w.P .No. ORDER: With the consent of both the parties' this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission' 2. The writ petition is frled with the following prayer: Length -o 6oKM "To issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT oF MANDAMUS, un".a*g the respondents 2 to 7 to provide electricity connection Supply to *"*t"tt"Url" for Category HT-02 Load 65O'O0KVA the Commercial Building in Survey No 26/A admeasuring A..o.o3.3;;;s or 400 Sq yards siruated at Ramachandra Puram Town' B*""t"t-at" p'ram (M)' Sangareddy District' T S' bounded Vendors' south: Land of Vendees' East: by North: Remaining ;;; West: Land of Vendees without insisting upon ' Remaining Land of Sth respondent by holding that the refusal to '"*"' occupancy certif,lcate provide electricity conncction to the above referred premises is illegal and "ottt'"tt''o?to ""rn 'nt arbitrary"

3. Heard Government ReddY, learn the learned counsel for the petitioners' Pleader for Enerry for respondent No'1' Sri N'sreedhar ed Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos'2 learned G.MadhusudhanReddy,leamedStandingCounsel and 3 and appearing for Respondent No'4 ald perused the record' I, 1t I I 2

4. Today, u.hen the matter is taken up, it is subrnitted by the learned coursel for the petitioners that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered b1, the order dated 26.7.2018 passed by this Court in W.p.No.260g5 of 20 I g. The same is not seriously disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents

5. In view of the above, for the reasons a,like in the said order, this writ petition is' disposed of directing the respondents to release power supply to the lrremises of the petitioners subject to the compriance of terms and conditions and on furnishing al undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipat Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certihcate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate :rction in accordance with 1aw. M iscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/.T. TIRUMALA D EVI EPUTY REGIS r SECTION OFFICER I\J Iffi .,.5['J.:'.',:,"T,'i"",,1Xn"[:-t8,ooiidEnersy Department Secretariat, To 1 2 The Chairman_and Managing Director, Southern pr ftil: EBgi"frB t, te Lt J, h a vi i s its c ;,p -,i" ;il; 3r31,%'rt:'ilTl'i8 "".?[t?u ' JHdtiyo:'Jntending Engineer, / operation/sangareddy circle TGSpDCL, o l!i,,rg3f[]ll;'::"15' Greater Hvderabad Municipat corporarion, /

5. One CC to 9MT T!:IAKUR ROOPA SINGH Advocate IOPUCI 6 Qne gtQ to 9Rl N SREEDHAB REDDY' 9c FOR TGSPDQL IOPUCI REDDY' 9! rOn GHMC tQPucl 7. one 99 to SRIG MADHUSuDHAN R Two Ces tq GP FqR ENERGY' High Court for the Stqte qf Telangana at - fiyderahad [OUTI I _Trivo PQ coPiqs g. (Along wi[h thq gopy of order d3ted 26'Q7'!01$' in W'P'No'26085 of 2018) BS y' . -- ^- ^^.6 :- I BSR HIGH COURT DATED:02 t04t2025 CC TODAY t ORDER WP.No.9830 of ZOZ1 I / ) 1 11E Sl;1/ €' ( z P 0I APH 2025 t [,t t : i:/ T:\'r I 0 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS t\ 4\t\ I (v\ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26O85 of 2O18 ORDER: Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R Vinod Recldy, Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents I to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipat Corporation, appearing for 4'l' respondent.

2. It is stttle(l by learnecl cortrsel :rppt':tt ittg lbr the petitioner :rs rvell as Sn R Vil-rotl ltcdcly' Stirntlinq counsel appearing lbr lespondent Nos l to 3 that the issLro in this Writ Petition is covered by the order ol this Court dt.23-03-2018 in W.P.No.9789 of 2018'

3. Therefore for reasons alike, this Writ I'etition is also disposed of u,ith a direction to the respon(lents to reLease the power supply to the Premises of the petitioner- sul:iject to the compliance of the terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to prodrrce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period' and if no such occupancy certihcate is produced within such period, it is open to the responclents to take appropriate action in accordance with law There shall be no order as to 2 I

4. Conseclue ntly, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sl'rall stand disrnisscd. 26rrL July. 20 I8 M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J