Julakanti Shakuntala, Wo Krishna Murthy v. Mallampeta Sathyanarayana (DIED)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order in 1.A.No.346 of 2019 in O.S.No.987 of 2O22 H.M.O.P.No.114 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Sangareddy. Between:
1. Julakanti Shakuntala, Wo Krishna Murthy, Aged 61 years, occ. House wife, No H.No.25-2212, Kakatiya Nagar, RC Puram, Sangareddy District.
2. B.Swaroopa Rani(Died), W/o. Late B. Prabhakar, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No.4-68, Pr Pally X Road, Opp. Fepsico Company, Sangareddy District. ..,PETITIONERYPETITIONERYPLAINTI FF AND
Mallampeta Sathyanarayana (DIED), S/o. Late M. Kistaiah, Aged about: 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R:/o.H.No.12-1 1-787/2, Boudhanagar, Street No.2, Pochamma Temple, Warasiguda, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDENT 2. M.Varalakshmi, Wo Late Sathyanarayana, Aged 66 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o H.No.12-11-78712, Warasiguda, Near Pochamma Temple, Secunderabad.
M. Raju, S/o Late Sathyanarayana, Aged 48 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H.No. 12-11-78712, Warasiguda, Near Pochamma Temple, Secunderabad.
M. Prem Kumar, S/o Late Sathyanaryana, Aged 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o H.No. 12-11-78712, Warasiguda, Near Pochamma Temple, secunderabad ...RES'.NDENT'/RES'.NDENTS/ L.Rs OF DEFENDANT No.1 R2 to R4 LR petition is pending in trial court lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of order in lA No. 346 of 2019 in OS No. 987 OF 2022 dated 04-12-2019. .-,11. -3' = IA NO: 2 OF 2l2ti Petition unc e r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circunstilnces stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High Court may b,r pleased to pass an order directing the respondents herein not to alienate the sr.bject property during the penden:y of main CRP. lA NO: 3 OF 202t; Petition unce r Section 151 CPC praying that in th-e circu n' sti; rn ces stated in the affidavit riled r1 support of the petition, the High Court may bi: pleased to pass an order grantrngy lsave to make LRs of the Respondent No.1 as parties to the present CRP. Counsel for the Patitioners: Sri P. Rama Sharana Sharma Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made t1s following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL R.EVTSION PETITION No. 1 4OL of 2o25 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is fiied to is-sue direction to the Ieerned Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy in I.A.No.346 of 20 19 in O.S.No.9B7 of 2022 H.M.O.P.No.114 of 2023 to dispose AS expeditiously as possible.
Heard both sides. Perused the record. { I f l
3. The trial Court gralted ad-interim injunction 1n I.A.No.346 of 2019 on 04.12.2019 and from then onwards the interrm injunction was extended from time to time. It is stated lhat suit is filed for partition ald separate possession and in view of bifurcation of the judicial districts, the matter is transferred from Narsapur to Salgareddy and it was renumbered as O.S.No.987 of 2022. During the pendency of the proceedings, petitioner No.2 died and he has no LRs and sole defendant died. In view of pendency of LR application, injunction was not extended, as such petitioner filed the present petltion s" 2
4. Consicte r i:rg the argument of learned c.or rnsel for petitioner. the trial Court is directed to extend the irrtr.rim order granted in I I' I'1o.346 of 2Ol9 and to dispose of t re sarne on merits after d ir; posal of the LR application bv cir rlv sranting opportunin, tc, troth sides.
With th: above direction, this civil revision F,etition 1S disposed of r:.t -lre stage of admission. No costs. Miscclla'r'ous petitions pending, if any, r;lt r1l stand closed //TRUE COPY// SdI/- IVIOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ sf:c'n0N oFFrcER To,
1. The Junlcr (l vil Judge at Sangareddy. 2. One CC to S ri P. Rama Sharana Sharma, Advocate [OPLJC ] 3. Two CD Cor es HIGH COUFIT DATED:251tt412025 I \ .$ *\ \ss n.9 c lr l ORDER CRP.No.14C1 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION I\T THE STAGE OF,qDMISSION 5 v t L .4 ) )D
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.