?Ii.T v. HYderabad'

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that a) the action of the respondents in seeking to interfere with, the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner property in an extent of 1777'.7'7Sq yards in plot No 6' 7' B and 9 in Sy No'444120' Paluancha village and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem district without there being any authority and without following due process of law' as illegal' arbitrary and contrary to law and also violative-of article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia besides the same is being violative of Principles of Natural Justice' ---.-.-_/ l.A.NO:1 oF 2019 Petition Unoer Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court rnay be preased to direct the respondernts not to enter / interfere with the petitioner rand admeasuring in an extent of 1t27 77 Sq.yards in plot No.6, 7, 8 and g in Sy.No.444l20, Palvancha vi'age 'and mandar, Bhadradri Kothagudem district, pending disposar of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner : SRI SRINTVASA RAO MADTRAJU counsel for the Respondents : SMT s.SRAVANTHT, AGp FoR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER ,-t -- THE HONOURABLE SFI JUSTICE K'SARATH WRIT PEf,ITION No. LO20l of 20L9 ORDER: This writ petition is frled questioning the action of the respondents in interfering rvith the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the property to an extent of 1777.77 Sq. yards in plot Nos'6' 7 I and 9 in Sv'No'444120 situated at Palvancha Town and Maldal' BhadraCri- Kothagudem District without there being any authority and without following due process of law as illegal ald arbitrary

2.I{eardMr.SrinivasallaoMadiraju,learnedCounselfor the petitioner and Smt' S'sravanthi' learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue' 3 Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is owner of the land to an extent of 1777 '77 Sq' yards in Plot Nos.6, 7, 8 and 9 in Sy.No.444l 20 of Palvancha Town and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District having purchased the same from Good Samarrtan 2 - tUO ,. ,OrO, .r!5ii Evangelica,. Lutheran Mission Bhadracha_lam through regrstered saie deed No.32Z4/2O16 dated 20.OT.2Ot6 and since then, he is in possession ald enjoyment of the said property be prosecuted,,

4. The lrlarned counsel for the peiltioner further submitted that on 04.O5.2O19, the respondent No.4 has erected a board mentioning as ,this lald belongs to Government and any trespassers will without lssu ng any notice to her. Immediately, petitioner has approached the respondent No.1 along u,ith the documents showing her titte and ownership over the property and requested to remove the said rboard, but no actron has bet:n taken. He further submits that though the petitioner ancl her vendors have absolute title over the subject property and the Tahsildar has issued pattadar pass books arLd title deeds in favour of her vendors, respondent IIo.4 without lssurng any notice and opportunity to the petitioner has erected the board in the subject land, which is illegal and arbitraqr and requested to ,- 3 SK, J WP No.1020 i of 2019 allow the Writ Petition by directing the respon of the Petitloner interfere with the possession subject land' dents not to over the 5 Revenue The learned Assistant Government Pleader for basing on the written instructions issued by the Tahsildar, Palvancha has stated that the respondents are not interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the property in Sy'No'44 4f 20' however' they have erected ttre board in Sy.No.444/1 which is purely a Government land' Shc submits that the petitioner is trying to grab the land of the Government by showing her documents pertaining to the land in Sy'No'44412O and the respondents are not interfering with the property of the pdtitioner in Sy.No.444/ 20 and'requested to dismiss the Writ Petition' 6. After hearing both sides and perusal of the record' this Court is of the considered view that the respondents as per the written instmctions have stated that they are not interfering with the ProPertY of the Petitioner Sy.No. 44/2O situated at Palvancha Town and Mandal' but 1n I -- 4 *O *..rOrO, ,,35ii the dispute is with r,egard to the boundaries of the subject land. In vjew of the sarne, petitioner is at approach ttre competent authorit5r to conduct identification of her land basing on the pertaining to Sy.No.444 survey for iiberty to documents / 20

7. In vievr, ,rf the same, this Writ petition is disposed of by grandng libert-v to the pefitioner to approach the competent authority to r:onduct survey for identification of her lard. No order as to costs.

8. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, petition shali stand closed. pending in this writ SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA GIST AS RAO RAR/ //TRUE COPY// To \ SE Hyderabad OFFICER gana. Revenue Department, Secretariat, Telangana State,

1. The State of Tela.t 2 The District Collertor Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 3 The Revenue Divrsionar offi""i xtt"nJ'g",;iJ;, "e';lorrori 4. The T_a h s i tda r, pa ta va n ch a, e nao ra dii"Koii"ci,Iaui., ot.tri"t 5. Two CCs to Gp Ff,R REVENUi, HGh ffi;"f.;iie state of retansana at 6. One CC to SRI SRINIVASA RAo IvIADIRAJU, Advocate [oPUCl 7. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad. [OUT] Kothasudem District SA BS / o 22 P5t 2$25 * D . - .r....,, aat.'\'.' _,i' ',:/ I HIGH COURT DATED:13 t0Bl2O2S ORDER WP.No.10201 of 2O1g DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. u \