High Court · 2025

16 Anand Prakash Srivastava S/o. B. S. Prasad Aged 31 years. Occ: Const.,

17. Sameer Ahmed S/o. Mushtaq Ahmed, Aged 35 years, Occ: Sl/Exe, .18 Ramvir Singh S/o. Ramiilal, Aged 49 years, Occ: HC/GD,

19. L.K Sahoo S/o. Late Ananda Sahoo, AgeC 47 years, Occ: HC/Gd, 2C V AIth Kumar S/o. C.P. Viiaya Kumar, Aged 35 years, Occ: Const , 21 Div .'a S W/o. M. Lambodhara Kurup, Aged J,J yeais, Occ: Lady Const., 22 K Chnna Rao S/o. K. Raja Rao, Aged 35 years, Occ: Const., 23 SanJeev K.G S/o Gangadharan, Aged 44 years, Occ: Const., 24 Raju A Konda S/o, A. Venkata Rao, Aged 34 years, Occ: Const., -]]r N Kamaraju S/o N. Narayana, ;r:ec 35 years, Occ. Const., 26 Vinay Kumar S/o. Mahendra Singh Teotia Aged 32 years, Occ: Sl/Exe., 27 Deshmukh Abhijit Suresh S/o. Deshmukh Suresh Rama Rao aged 27 years, Occ: Const.,

28. Rashma Rajnibeck D/o. Late Albert Beck, Aged 26 years, Occ: Lady const.,

29. Nirmala Thakur W/o Jagdish Thakur, Aged 29 years, Occ: Lady Const., 30 r.,4an Singh S/o. Etwar Singh, ." Je I -13 years Occ Const.,

31. Dayaram YadavSio. Sher Singh, Aged 34 years, Occ: St/Exe, 32 Nihar Ramjan Shetty S/o. H.B. Shetty, Aged 39 years, Occ: Sl/Exe,

33. AJrth Kumar S S/o. Late M.R. Soman, Aged 34 years, Occ: Const.,

34. Neeraj Singh S/o. Surendra Pal Singh, A.ged 30 years, Occ: Sl/Exe, s L I t. h t. :8 Itr. h L E F Eil F, '', i F 35 Ram Niwash ChoYal S/o' Mangtlal' Aged 31 years, Occ: Sl/Exe'

36. Ralesh Kumar Sio Nemlchand' Ageo d1 Years, Occ: Sl/Exe' 37 Raieev S/o. Ramashrya Singh' Aged i1 Years, Occ: Sl/Exe ' 38 l\4anish Kumar S/o Hardwarilal' Aged 32 Years, Occ: Sl/Exe' 39. Vineet Kumar S/o Dharamvir Singh' Aoed 3'1 vears. Occ: Sl/Exe' iXr",i."",i ,,"nro ctsF unit, Raieev Gandhi ini"i*,.nar nir Port, Shamshabad' Hyderabad AND oeputv lnspector General n1 rhe central lndustrlal Security Force (CISF) i.ro Quarters, South Zone' Besanthnagar' ii3"#i .ii ;, nf The Senlor Commandant' lini,"J rnoustriar security Force unit' ir,," Shamshabad, HYderabad i^t"'nation;l Airport Limited' "C""ot, 'is Petitioners Resp()ndents Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the Transport Allowance to the petitioners as per the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and being violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to eitend the Transport Allowance together with Dearness Allowance lo the petitioners for the period from 1.9.2OO8 onwards together-with arrears and other benefits to which petitioners are entitled. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K.JAGADISHWAR REDDY ,-t / Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUW SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Gourt made the following ORDER E.B THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SIJDHA WRIT PETITION No.7616 OF 2oI2 ORDER: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not extending the Transport Allc,w,ance to the petitioners as per lhe Central Civil Services (Revis,:d Pay) Rules, 2008 is illegal and to direct the respondents lo extend the Transport allowance to the petitioners from the: period from

01.09.2008 onwards together with arrears and ottrer beneflts to which petitioners are entitled.

2. Heard both sides. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for respondents sated that thcy have paid the entire amounL of Transport Allowance as per the Officc memo dated 29.08.2008 and in the tabuiar form of the merno, the detaits of rate ol transport allowance per month to each emplovee ,,vas givcn.

4. Learned counsel for petitioners stated that if at all the respondents paid the amount they have no grievan:e against the

5. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsels, and as the Travelling Allowance is paid as per the office memo, [his Court finds no reason Lo continue the presen t u.rit peution and is liable to be dismissed. r ( .JC 6 In the result, this writ petition is clismissed No costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closcd. //TRUE COPY' /._ SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1. One CC to SRt K.JAGADTSHWAR REDDY , Advoc 2. One CC to SRt cADt PRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUTY OF lNDIA, Advocate [OpUC Two CD Copies To J SA GJP SECTION OFFICER oPUCI LICITOR GENERAL c./tv ll=a.l1l-r;-.-.d3, I ) HIGH COURT DATED:05 tO2t2O2S ORDER WP.No.7616 of 2012 '/'r' cJ o ,t , v !: I il? i.:iliS * ]ssanr,;{:j \---;j;/'- DISMISSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. *,$ .*a!i - -,r:{ie:r+ i?$}&&!r.!e "- -1