High Court · 2025

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary' Revenue (UC) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad The Special Officer and Competent Authority (FAC), Urban Land Ceiling' Hyderabad. Sri Syed Mustafa Akbar, S/o. late Syed Ali Akbar, aged 85 years' Occ: Business Mrs. Sabiha Noor-Ul-Hassan Jafari, W/o Syed Noor-Ul-Hassan' aged about 82 years, Occ: Housewife Syed Sirai Akbar, S/o. late Syed Ali Akbar, aged about 72 years' Occ: Business lMirza Yunus, S/o. Mrs. Sajida Miza & Miza Abid, aged about 57 years' Occ: Business Miza [\/ohammad, S/o. Mr. Sajida Mirza & Mirza Abid, aged about 55 years' Occ: Business Resoondent No.3, 4, 6 & 7 are represented qy-tlr-eil GPA Syed Siraj Akbar' H;fi;il;;i 'N;.'5,' ieso"nt of' H.No.10-3'-2B2tNB. Humavun Nagar' Hyderabad The J.J. Cooperative Housing Society, le^p by its Secretary' -S! -a la1ryi idlriuii, slo.'eat" persnaJ, iged ino'ut oej vears, resident of H No 5-4-484' Station Road, NamPallY, HYderabad RR 3 to 8 are impleaded as per C.O. dt' 15'11'2010 in WPMP'No'31995/10 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lnd a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the action of the respondents in not considering cases in applications Nos. E214551,1O106. E21455141106; E.21455142106 and E21455145/06 for regularization of the land to an extent of 800 Sq.yards in Sy.No. 129149 corresponding new Sy.No. 330 situated at Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 455 Revenue (UC) Department, daled 29-7 -2002 as illegal and void and colsequently direct the respondents to pass orders on the applications for regularization. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO 30083 0F 2010) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents consider the applications; No's. E21455/40/06; E21455/41106: E.2l455142lOG and E21455145/06 for regularization of the tand to an extent of 800 Sq.yards in Sy.No.129/49 corresponding new Sy.No. 330 situated at Road No: 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad in ternrs of G.O.Ms.No. 455 Revenue (UC) Department, dated 29 -7 -2002 as otherwise the petitioners would suffer serious and irreparable loss and hardship. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI TARUN G.REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.'l & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 8: SRI M.V.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION 0.23506 of 2OlO ORDER The writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not considering cases in application Nos.E2/455/4L/O6, D2/4ssl42lo6 and E2/455/45/O6 for regularization of the land to an extent of 800 sq. yards in 'situated at Road Sy.No.129149 corresponding to new Sy.No.30, No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, In terms of G.O.Ms.No.455 Revenue (UC) Department dated

29.O7.2OO2, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the unofficial respondents.

3. Both the learned counsel submitted that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioners and the respondents No.3, 4, 6 and 7 represented by their General Power of Attorney, respondent No.5, have entered into a compromise and to that effect a copy of the joint of memo of understanding dated 15.09.2025 has been filed vide USR.No.1OO92O/2O25 in the Registry, signed by the petitioners, respondents No.3, 4, 6 and 7 (represented by respondent No.5 as their GPA), respondent No.5 and respondent No.8 along with their respective counsel. On specifically asked, both the counsel confirm the terms of compromise as recorded in ) - *-1 the joint memo of compromise. The same is taken on record and the terms of the joint memo of compromise are as urder:

1. All parties agree that irrespective of the result, in the aforementioned Writ Petitions, the Writ Petitioners and R.espondent No.8 shall share the Schedule Property admeasuring 94O Square yards equally or sell the same and share the sale proceeds equally in accordance with law.

2. The Petitioners and Respondent Nos.3 to 8 (Respondent Nos.3, 4,6 and 7 are represented by their GPA Syed Siraj Akbar, Respondent No. 5) jointly state and agree that this compromise is intended to remain binding and operative irrespective of the outcome of the aforementioned Writ Petttions (namely W.P.No.19969 of 2OO7, W.P.No.20060 of 2OO-:, W.p.No.28741 of 2008 and W.P.No.29200 of 2008), and that the terms herein shall conclusively govern the rights and obllgations oF the parties in relation to the Schedule Property in a I eventualities.

3. That, it is further agreed between the parties as. under:- a b This compromise is thus not aFfected by an./ result in the batch of Writ Petitions (namely W.P.No.19969 of ZOO7, W.P.No.20060 ot 2OO7, W.P.No.28741 cf 2008, and W.P.No.29200 of 2008). Both parties have paid regularization charges to the Government (Respondent No.1) and may seek adjustment of the same in case of regularisation, but do not propose to seek refund of the same in ilny event and hence the interests of the Government (Respondent No. 1) are not affected insofar as the Schedule property is concerned. c This compromise shalt not have any bearing in respect of the subject matter of the above batch of writ petitions -) (namely W.P.No.19959 of 2007, W.P.No.20060 of 2OO7, W.P.No.28741 of 2008, and W.P.No.292OO of 2OO8).

4. That this Joint Memo of Compromise is accordingly being filed, and it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass appropriate orders to give effect to and effectuate the said comPromise, thereby enabling the Petitioners and Respondent No.8 to jointly alienate the Schedule Property to third parties and apportion the sale proceeds as agreed, as the respondent No.3 to 7 received entire consideration from Respondent No.8.

4. Since this Court is satisfied that the aforesaid compromise by way of joint memo of compromise is executed by the parties out of their free will and without any coercion and they confirm the terms thereof, there is no impediment in recording the said compromise.

5. In view of the above. the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the joint memo of compromise dated 15.09.2025. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR "raei NOTE:- That the Clause Nos.1 & 4 at paragr?p[ !'l-o'3 dated 16.09.2025 in w.P.No.23506 of 2010 ofrf,E i" *io.siv read and the same is corrected as per.the ori"o'5t'ttt" Honble Court dt. 31.10.2025 in l'A'No'1 -'---ittis amended order shall substitute the earlier ol 2025. order which has already been dispatched on 18.09.2025. SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ilEIT(€NOFFICER To, I The Principat Secretary, Revenue (UC) Department, Secretariat' Hyderabad' Government of Telangana --?::--_ 2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority (FAC), tJrban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad 3 One CC to SRI TARUN G.REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI M.V.DURGA PRASAD, Advocate IOPUCI 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] \

6. Two CD Copies BSR PSK HIGH COURT DATED: 1610912025 31110t202s CC TODAY \ AMENDED ORDER WP.No.23506 of 2010 _.._- r) , t I / ': ,--)ii;- 1 . ,.) ' i-'/.:.. * iiill! 2m5 ,a_ 5> t, !! t I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS C\ J