The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the ,rircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider my representation dated 21 .o3.2025 and refund the EMD amount to a tune of Rs.2g,95,0g6/- for hvo separate lots i.e. AMC-Mittapally, TWSC-Kondurg, in respect of T6nder for e-Auction held on 18.11.2024, pending disposal of the above Wp No. ot 2O2S Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.pRAVEEN REDDY Cdunsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR AGRICULTURE & CO-OP. Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.V|SHNU, SC FOR TCMFL WRIT PETITION NO: 9638 oF 2025 Between: Mis. Tripura Trading Corporation, Rep about 62 years, Occu. Business, R/d. Market Yard, Siddipet, Telangana 1-1 _P. roprietor D.Anthaiah, Aged 14912, Karimnagar Road, Opp. AND 1 z The S.tate^of Telangana, Rep by it's principal Secretary (Agriculture and Co_ operation Department), Secretariat Building, Hyderabad- ' " The Telangana Co-operative Marketing Federation Limited. Reo. bv its Managrng urrector, Jambagh, Hyderabad, Telangana _ 50C, Ogs ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statei in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents No.2 herein in not refunding the EMD amount to a tune of Rs.31 ,04,58 2l- for tour separate lots i.e. SWC-Medak, AMC-Madnoor, AMC-Jukkal, SWC_Kangti pursuant to the Tender for Sale of Sun Flower yasangi 2OZ3-24 through e- auction held on 18 11 2024 as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction, and consequently direct the Respondents herein to refund the EMD amount of Rs.31,04,5821 for four separate lots i.e. SWC-Medak, AMC-Madnoor, AMC- Jukkal, SWC-Kangti with interest @ 12 yo per annum. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, lhe High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider my representation dated 21 .03.2025 and refund the EMD amount to a tune of Rs.31,04,58 2l- for tour separate lots i.e. SWC-Medak, AMC-Madnoor, AMC-Jukkal, SWC-Kangti, in respect of Tender for e-Auction held on 18.11.2024, pending disposal of the above Wp No. of 2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.PRAVEEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR AGRICULTURE & CO-OP. Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.VISHNU, SC FOR TCMFL The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADIIAVI DEVI w.P.NOS.960 2 AND 9638 0F 2025, COMMON ORDER: in bot h t hese writ petitions, tle petitioners are challenging t he action of the respondent I\1o.2 in not refunding tht EMD amounts to a tune of Rs.31,04,5821- in respect of lors t.e., SWC-Medak, AMC-Madnoor, l\MC-Jukkal, SWC-Kangti rr.r W.P.No.9638 of 2025 and EMD amounts to a tune of Rs.29,95,O86/ in respect of lots i.e., AIVIC-Mittapally, TWSC Kondr-r rg, pursuant to the tenders for sale of .Sun [.1on,er Yas:rngi 2023-24 through e-auction held on
18.11.2024 even though the sale was not confirrned as iilegal, arbitrarl ancl to pass such other order or crders in the interest of .justice
2. Lt'arned counsel for the petitioners a.sr well as the learned stan(1ing couusel for the respondent No.2 confirmed that subsequcnt to the filing of these writ petitions, the sa-le conhrmation letlt:r has been issued by the respondents. A copy of the same dated 17.04.2025 is also filed before this Court I 1 2 -]
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, seeks liberty to frle representations to the respondent No.2 for extension of time for making payments of amounts as intimated in the letter dated 17.04.2O25.
4. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make representations to the respondent No.2 within a period of one (l) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the respondent No.2 thereafter shall consider the same and pass approprrate orders thereon.
5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of There shall be no order as to costs. 6 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these wrlt petitions, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. T.TIRUMALA DEVI PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFTCER I . The Principal. Secretary (Agriculture and Co-operation Department), Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. To,
2. lhe Managing Direclor, Telangana Co-operative Marketing Federation Limited, Jambagh, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 095 3. One CC to SRI N.PRAVEEN REDDY, Advocate TOPUCI 4. One CC to SRI P.VISHNU, SC FOR TCMFL IOPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE & CO-OP, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies BSR HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 CC TODAY E s L'-1. ? 115 r?n 2f6 'i.,. lia , ' * -] '. ,,. .: \i, . ,i .i /' COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.9602 and 9638 of 2025 DISPOSING OF BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS, WITHOUT COSTS