Mohammad lmam Pasha v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of d3recting the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Chit Funds Act s. 70
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
- Chit Fund Act, 1982 s. 70
- Chit Fund Act s. 70
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Takin lnto consideration (a) The aforesaid facts and cir<:r rmstances of the case, (b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the p:titioner and learned Assistant Government pteader "or Revenue, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. L to 3, (c)…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ more particulady in the nature of Mandamus duly ...RESPONDENTS
declaring the action of lhe 1st respondent in not considerin3 the appeal filed under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act dated 23.12.2023, as agairr t the award passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration case No. 606 of 2019 b r the sole Arbitrator as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice ir cl consequenfly, direct the 1st respondent to adjudicate the appeal as well as the ir terlocutory application for stay within a specific time in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circL nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may e pleased to stay the operation of Award No. 606 of 2019 by the sole arbitrator ber\ een the petitioner and 4th respondent herein in regard to Chit Grout No. KNTO{;I 4.3, in the interest of justice. Counsel for.the Petitioner: SRl. P RAMA SHARANA SHAFII ,lA Counsel for the Respondents No 1 To 3: AGp FOR REVEl,l JE Counsel for the Respondents No.4 To B:-- The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.9988 oF 2026 DATE: O 2.O4.2026 Between : Mohammad Imam Pasha AND The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 7 others.
ORDER ...
Petitioner ... ResPondents Heard Sri P, Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitaoner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3.
The petitioner ap oroached the Court seekinq Draver as under: "...to pass an order or direction or writ more particularly in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the action of the 1't respondent in not considering the appeal filed under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act 2 sN'j \ '.P. No.998B of 2026 dated 23.12.2023, as against the award pas sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No.606 the sole Arbitrator as illegal, arbitrary and i prlnciples of natural justice and consequ(|r the l't respondent to adjudicate the appeal the interlocutory application for stay withi- time in the interest of justice and to pass... '' ;ed by the rf' 2019 by gainst the tly, direct as well as a specific
The case of the titioner. in bri c f as oer the averments made in the affidavit filed bv I he oetitioner in su ooort of the oresent Writ Petition is ! s under:- The petitioner joined in the Chit Fund -ompany with the respondent No.4 in Group No. KNTOSM I and became successful bidder in the auction held on 28 r
14.20L7. The respondent No.4 did not release the chit ,t xount to the petitioner. The respondent No.4 started derl rcting the bid installments from the petitioner from the rr onth of May, 2017 itself. The respondent No.4 filed Arbitr€ tion Case and Execution Petition against the petitioner. -ne petitioner filed appeal before the respondent No.1 herr in along with stay petition seeking stay of operation o the Award. Aggrieved by the action oF the 1't resprt rdent in not considering the appeal against the award pas:; :d by the sole 3 Arbitrator in Arbitration Case N0.606 of 20t9, the petitioner had approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. S N,.} w.P. No.99BB of 2026 4 PERUSED THE RE CORD DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIO N
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that aggrieved against the award passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No.606 of 2019 dated 30.04.2019. the petitioner preferred appeal under Section 70 of Chit Fund Act, 1982 before the 1't respondent on 23.12.2025 along with I.A. seeking stay of the operation of the award dated 30.04.2024 passed in Arbitration Case No.600 of 2019 on the file of Chit Arbitrator/Deputy Registrar of Chlts at Karimnagar. The matter had not been heard as on date and therefore, appropriate orders may be passed in the interest of justice.
The learned Assistant overnment Ple der for Revenu e aDoearrnq n behalf of does ot oDDose Dassinq of orders for exDeditious unde r al filed bv he Detitaoner disoosal of the aDDe soondent No .1to 3 I 4 Section 70 of the Chit Fund Act. sN,l s/.P. No.9988 or 2026 1982, dated
23.12.2025 before the o r dent herein rieved h oassed bv the Arbitrator in Arbitrat ion Case No.606 o 2 9 dated
30.()4 .20L9.
Operative part
Takin lnto consideration (a) The aforesaid facts and cir<:r rmstances of the case, (b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the p:titioner and learned Assistant Government pteader "or Revenue, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. L to 3, (c) The award dated 30.O4.2O24 l assed by the Chit Arbitrator/Deputy Registrar o Chits at Karimnagar, (d) The fact that petitioner has g referred the appeal against the said Award daterl 3O.O4.2O24 passed in Arbitration Case No.6O6 of 2OI9 before the Chit Arbitrator/Deputy Registrar ol Chits at I I $I ! g I I ,i I ; I I i I i: i I q Karimnagar dated 23.12.2025 is the 1't respondent SN,] W.P. No.99BB of 2026 herein. The writ petition is disposed of d3recting the respondent No.1 to consider and dispose off on merits the appeal preferred by the petitioner dated 23.L2.2O25 including LA filed by the petitioner seeking stay of operation of award dated 30.O4.2025 in Arbitration Case No. 6O6 of 2O19 on the fite of Chit Registrar,/ Deputy Registrar of Chits; Karimnagar, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. There shal! be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if anY , pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/.A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSTSTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Principal Secretary Revenue, State of Telangana, Secretariat Hyderabad. 2. The District Registrar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 3. The Deputy Registrar of Chits, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 4. One CC to SRl. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies DAN/PMK QX HIGH COURT C:] TODAY DATED: 0210412026 J /,,:i:',.: '.-\.- "' c.,,lr. .. ./.:..,". (' I r.. ,,of 1i'lc rili lll ri / 'l #i/ .). U .:'. t/ ../ -- ORDER WP.No.9988 of 2026 ( 1 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS w o !)- I i I
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of d3recting the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Chit Funds Act — s. 70; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Chit Fund Act, 1982 — s. 70; Chit Fund Act — s. 70.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 02 Apr 2026. The bench was SUREPALLI NANDA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.