✦ High Court of India · 10 Nov 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 10 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
10 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,392 words

7. Smt Pothuraju Jyothi, D/o Late Smt. K Jayapradha, fged about 69. y.e.ap' Occ. Househbld, h/o Nagilla Village, Madgula Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 8. Smt M Vanaja, D/o Late Smt.K Jayapradha-, AggQ &out 58 y9a5;, .Qcc' Private Empl<iy6e FUo Nagilla Village, MadgulaMandal, Ranga Reddy District 9. Smt. Lakkaraiu Neeraia, D/o Late Smt.K Jayapradha, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Household, R/o Nagilla Village, MadguldMandal, Ranga Reddy District 10.Smt. B Sandhya Rani, D/o Late Smt- B.Ramabai @ BgOf'l,.Aged abqut4T years, Occ. H6usehold, Fl/o Nagilla Village, MadgulaMandal, Ranga Reddy District. 1't.B Rama Rao, S/o Late Smt. B. Rama Bai @ RadhA Aged about 45 years, Occ. Businesi, Fl/o Nagilla Village, MadgulaMandal, Ranga Reddy District 12.Smt R Sharada, D/o Late Smt. Rama Bai @ Radha Aged about 43 years' - OiC. prirate Employee, Rl/o Nagilla Village,-MadgulaMandal, Ranga Reddy District. AND ...PETITIONERS

1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary' Home Department at Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Police Commissionerate, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District

4. The Station House Officer, Madgul Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 5. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District.

7. The Tahsildar, tVladgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 8. Kukatla Jangaiah, S/o. Late Narsaiah, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla. Madgul Mandal, R.R.District-509327. 9. Gosula Venkatesh, S/o. Sattaiah Aged about 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla. tt/adgul Mandal, R.R.District-509327.

10.Gosula Sattaiah, S/o. Jangaiah. Aged about 59 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagiila. Madgul Mandal, R.R.District-5}9327.

11.Yatham Venkataiah., S/o. [Vlallaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla. ttladgul fVlandal, R.R.District-509327.

12.Yatham Raju, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. F eroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla, Madgul [Vlandal, R. R.District-509327. l3.Kalakonda Ramesh., S/o. Jangaiah. Aged about 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla. Ivladgul [Vlandal, R.R.District-509327. lL.KalakondaPeddaiah, S/o. Kasaiah. Aged about 33 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla. Madgul [Vlandal, R.R.District-509327.

15.Seeta Yadaiah, S/o. Late Pochaiah. Aged about 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Feroze Nagar Village H/o. Nagilla. Madgul Mandal, R.R.District-509327.

16.Banne Varun, S/o Peddamallaiah Aged about 34 years,pOcc Agriculture FVo Nagilla Village, tr/adgul Mandal Ranga Reddy District. lT.Kalakonda Anjaiah, S/o Laxmaiah Aged about 43 years, Occ Agriculture RUo Feroze Nagar, H/o Nagilla Village, It/adgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

18.Seetha Peddaiah, S/o Ramulu Aged about 35 years, Occ. Agriculture Fl/o Feroze Nagar, H/o Nagilla Village, Madgul ltlandal, Ranga Reddy District l9.Kalakondaft/asaiah, S/o Jangaiah Aged about 55 years, Occ. Agriculture Fi/o Feroze Nagar, H/o Nagilla Village, Madgul [Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .

20. tVogili Shanker, S/o Jangaiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Agriculture Fl/o Feroze Nagar, H/o Nagilla Village, Madgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2l.Koppula .Srisailam, S/o Beeraiah Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o Feroze Nagar, H/o Nagilla Village, ttl'adgul'tr/andal, Ranga ReddiDistrict. 22.6.Mahender, 94g l1.vg.9aig.h Age-d about 42 years, occ. Agricutture Rl/o Feroze Nagar, H/o Nagilla Village, Madgur Mandil, Ranga Redd! District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 and 4 in not allowing the Petitioners who are the lnamdars/ORc holders to cultivate their Agricultural Lands bearing Sy.No.32B to 330, 476 to 479,4a1,482,4go,4g1,4g7 to 505, 507 to 509,527,528, 531, 536, 538 to 542,544,547,550,553, SS7, 561, 562, 565 566,568,86 569 admeasuring Ac.180-04 gts situated at Nagilla Village Madgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District is arbitrary, illegal.against the principles of Natural justice and against their Police N/anual and allowing the encroachers, Trespassers like unofficial Respondents No. 8 to 22, their supporters, henchmens stating that their activities, actions are civil in nature is arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and consequentty direct the Respondents No. 3 and 4 to take stern actions against the unofficial Respondents No. 8 to 22 and their supporters, henchmens who are illegally encroaching, trespassing, damaging and demolished the Heritage structure as per law and to give police protection to the petitioners at the time of cultivating their lands, in the interest of Justice lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ; * Petition under Section 151 CPC praying tfrit in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tfre High Courl may be pteased to issue a direction to the Respondents No. 3 and.4 to give Police Protection to the petitioners herein es there is life threat to the petitioners whenever they visit to their Agricultural Lands for cultivation, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice * i :T lA NO: 2 OF 2025 d,I, .t ,l a Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tne i{igh Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the Respondents No. a ,l{ 4 not to allow the unofficial Respondents No. 8 to 22 and their henchmen, supporters into our Agricuttural Lands bearing Sy.No.328 to 330, 476 to 47g,48'1,482,4g0,4g1,4gT to 505, 507 to 509, 527 , 528, 531, 536, 538 to 542, 544, 547 , 550, 5S3, 557, 561 , 562, ,I 565 566,568, & 569 admeasuring Ac.180-04 guntas situated at Nagilla Village Madgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District till the Revenue Authorities like Respondents No. 5 and 6 i.e. the District Collector & RDO decide the pending cases on the above said Agricultural Lands, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.RAMA RAO, REP. FOR SRI RAMARAJU SHYAM SUNDER Counsel for the Respondent No.1, 3 & 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.2, 5 to 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.8 to 17 & 20 to 22: SRI ROHIT POGULA The Court made the following: ORDER : ;t ,* tr**tit t t€ i : e {{ { :a,,I t .a o.t I t I , .,/ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL No. ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. M.Rama Rao, learned counsel representing Mr. Ramaraju Shyam Sunder, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2 3 Permission is accorded, as prayed for. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.C. DEEPI ANT SECTION OFFICER To, \

1. One CC to SRI RAMARAJU SHYAM SUNDER' 2. One CC to SRI ROHIT POGULA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two ccs to Gp FOR HOME, High court for the'state of Telangana at 4. Two CCs to GP rdn nTVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] loPUCl Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD CoPies p BSR BS HIGH COURT DATED: 1011112025 ORDER WP.No.9682 of 2025 t II,| i, : s a .l i {, i ! DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION :: D WITHOUT CO : I , STS I : t a I f. q o() t{0\l zffi 72 t: * I 4 *

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments