✦ High Court of India · 14 Aug 2025

G.Prashanth Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 14 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
14 Aug 2025
Length
1,208 words

I::.?t3i';I),l.llouse d$'berab Smt.l\4ariyamma Wio. J.lssaq. age 62 years, Occ Sr.ffir, ruo 391 1202,'Madhuranagar, trleredm6t, Secunderabad, HyOffiOaO. ad, Ranga H.No.29-

7. Smt.Nirmala D/o l\,4ariyamma, age 35 years, Occ Business, R/o H.No.29- 3911202, [\,4ad h u ran agar, Neredmet, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petrtion under Article 226 of lf,e Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to rssue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents no.2 to 5 in not extending, not providing and not taking any steps for implementing the interim injunction order granted in favour of the petitioner in l.A.No.1167 of 2009 in O.S.NO.19B3 of 2009 on the file of the Honble ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, dated 23-6- 20'10, in regarding with the land admeasuring 664.95 sc 555.89 square metres in plot Nos 181-A and -l 81-B in s," No.591, 595 and 596, the land admeasuring 750 squarr square metres in plot Nos.18111 and in survey numbers r 595 and 596 situated at Eashweripuri Colony, Khapra Villrr Keesara [t/andal, Ranga Reddey District, totaling :c considering the representation submitted by the petitiorre- nothing but arbitrary, illegal. null and void and violative c 1 justice and violative of Arlicles 14, 19 and 2-1 of the ( Consequently, direct the respondents no2. to 5 to provido . :are yards equal to 'vey numbers in Sy. ,7ards equal to 627 Sy No.597/A, 591, r: and lt4u n icipa lityu, 2164 95 sq yds., dated 16-2-2016, is prin cip Ie s of natural onstltutio n of {nd ia. cpropriate protection and their aid in implementing the injunction order granted rr I A.No.1167 of 2009 in O.S.No.1983 of 2009 on the file of the Honble ll Additio:r Ranga Reddy District at L.B Nagai, dated 23-6-2010, in r: admeasuring 664.95 square yards equal to 555.89 s,l Nos.181-A and 181-B in survey numbers in Sy.NO 591. t,t admeasuring 750 square yards equal to 627 square metre,s in survey numbers in Sy. No.597iA, 591, 595 and 596, :r 750 square yares equal to 627 square metres in plot Ir r numbers in Sy.No.597/A, 591 , 595 and 596 situated at Khapra village and Municipality, Keesara [t4andal, Ranga ll to 2164.95 sq. yds., considering the representation of 16-2-2016 rl Senior Civil J udge, yarding with the land ra re metres in plot [i and 596, the land r plot Nos 181/1 and cl land admeasuring s 18112 and survey : ashwerip uri colony. :ddy District. totaling n* petitic ner, dated l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 7324 OF 2016 ..:;,': Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc- direct the respondents no2. to 5 to provide appropriate p'r for implementing the inlunction order granted in LA. I O.S.NO.19B3 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble tl Additiori Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, daled 23-6-20'10. in rc admeasuring 664.95 square yards equal to 555.89 squar< 181-A and 181-B in survey numbers in Sy. No.591, 5t 1 admeasuring 750 square yards equal to 627 square met- and in survey numbers in Sy. 1.']o.597/A, 59'1 , 595 : ;ircumsta nces stated 1 may be pleased to tection and their aid c.1 167 of 2009 in I Senior Civil J udge, ya rd ing with the land metres in plot No's and 596, the land s in plot No's.18'1/'1 tJ 596 situated at Eashweripuri Colony, Khapra Village and It4unicipalityu, Keesara lt4andal,,Ranga Reddey District, totaling to 2164.95 sq. yds., considering the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 16-2-2016. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K,VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER ryT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUK,! RAMJI WRIT PETITION No.5763 OF 201I ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 o Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...ro lssue an order or direction more particularlY ar€ of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate wrtt action of the respondents Nos.2 to 5 in not extendin!1. and not taking any steps for implementing the inte- order granted in favour of the petitioner in LA.No.11a O.S.NO.1983 of 2009 on the file of the Additiott,t ludge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, dated 2: regarding with the land admeasuring 664.95 square )', 555.89 square metres in plot Nos.181-A and 181' numbers in 5y.No.591, 595 and 596, the land adnl square yards equal to 627 square metres in plct Nn:. survey numbers in Sy.No.597/4, 591, 595 and 59( Eashweripuri Colony, Khapra Village and Municipa,i Mandal, Ranga Reddey District, totaling to 2164 | considering the representation submitted by the pe'i 16.02.2016, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null ,1 violative of principles of natural justice and consequerl respondents Nos.2 to 5 to provide appropriate protett aid in implementing the injunction order granted in ,. 2009 in O.S.N1.1983 of 2009 on the file of the II AC1 Civil ludge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, datej considering the representation of the pet't ( 16.02.2016....." 1 the natu re 'ecla,ing the tot providing T inju nction z of 2009 in Sen ior Civil ()6.2010, in rds equal to ) in survey asuring 750 81/1 and in situated at r'u, Keesara 5 sq, yd s., ioner, dated ,d void and y, direct the cn and their \.No.1167 0f t'ional Senior 23.A6.2010, lert dated I t

2. Heard Mr. K.Venumadhav, learned counsel f the petitioner and lvlr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant G()'/ rrnment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits 1t at the cause in this Writ petition does not survive for adjudicati : I and seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition as infructuous 2

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader takes no objection to the same.

5. Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. coPY/' 'rRUE SD/. A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT EEGISTRAR , EcleNoFFrcER 'l . One CC to SRI K VENUIVADHAV, Advocate tOpUCj 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR HON/E, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] To,

3. Two CD Copies o BSR tVtVT HIGH COURT DATED:1 410812025 \ ORDER WP.No.5763 of 2016 :':=:.-.- ...tr,..)] I I o 23 tr mfr ,( 5- lr -) ii -. il ,_. 1:. DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS l? rill^ bJ-

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments