✦ High Court of India · 04 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,396 words

9. Janagama Srinivas, S/o, Banaiah, Aged about 39. years, Occ : Agriculture' - H.f.fo]i-tSS, Jyohti'Nagar, Kamanpur-Mandal, Sundiila, Karimnagar - 505209 57 years, Occ : Agriculture, l0.Janagama Lingaiah, S/o. Ode u, Aged -about H.No. 1-52lA, Sundilla, Karimnagar - 505209. .,...PETITIONERS AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue- Department, Telanlana Seiretariat, BRKR- Bhavan, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500063. .

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat Buildings, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500063

3. The District Collector, Peddapalli District, Telangana. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramagiri ltlandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana.

5. The Tahsildar, Ramagiri lvlandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana. 6. The Village Revenue Officer, Sundilla Village, Ramagiri Mandal Peddapalli District, Telangana.

7. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by the General tanager, RG- 1 Area, Ramagundam, Godavarikhani. .....RESPONDENTS Petitron Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of [\tlandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in illegally trying to encroach into lands of petitioners in Sy.Nos.369, 375, 384, 390, 414 and 415 situated at Sundilla Village, Ramagiri Mandal, without any notice or opportunity or following due process of law, in spite of the fact that the said lands were assigned to petitloners. as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the Constitution under Articles 14, 314 and 300-4 and consequently to direct the respondents to follow due process of law either by passing resumption orders or initiating acquisition process in case the respondents seek to acquire Petitioners lands in Sy.Nos.369, 375,384,390, 414 and 415, situated at Sundilia Village, Ramagiri Mandal. |.A.NO:1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further construction activity including dispossession in lands in Sy.No.414l4 admeasuring Ac. 2- 20 gts., belongs to petitioner No. 1, and land in Sy. No. 414 admeasurrng Ac.2- 00 gts., belong to Petitioner No.2, and in Sy. No.414 admeasuring Ac.2- 00 gts., belongs to Petitioner No.3 in Sy. No. 414l3 admeasuring Ac.2- 00 gts., belongs to Petitioner No.4, and in Sy. No- 414 admeasuring Ac.3- 00 gts., belongs to Petitioner No.5 and in Sy. No. 414 admeasuring Ac. 2- 00 gts, belongs to Petitioner No. 6 in Sy. No. 415 admeasuring Ac 2- 35 gts., belongs to Petitioner No.7 and in Sy.No. 415 J b admeasuring Ac.2- 00 gts., belongs to Petitioner No B and Sy No 375 admeasuring Ac.3-00 gts., and in Sy No 3B4 admeasuring 0- 20 gts ' and in Sy' No.390 admeasuring 3- 00 gts., belongs to petitioner No 9 and in Sy No 369 admeasuring3-00gtsbelongstopetitionerNo-l0situatedatSundillaVillage' Ramagiri Mandal. t.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Between: Janaoama Srinivas, S/o.Banaiah, aged 39 years, Occ Jyothi Nagar, Kamanpur Mandal, Sundilla. Karimanga r - 505209 Agriculture, H.No. 1 -55, ....PETITIONER No.9 AND TElangana - 500059.

1. Kanakam Radhika, Wo- Janagama Narayana, Aged about 40 years' Occ.; ' il;;;iil;. -nlo. ewsn i7i santosrr' Nagar' saidabad' Hvderabad' 2. Kanakam Kanakaiah, S/o- Kanakam Rajaiah, Aged about 55 wars' Occ ; - ;i;;;;iil;",-n.No. o-ti-zzs, Sharma nagar, Karimnasar - 505001 3 Kanakam Raieshwari, Wio. Kanam Kanakaiah, Aged about.s-B- years, Occ " ;Xil;ii;;]fi.r1". o-'o-zzs, sharma Nagar, Karimnasar - 50500't ' 4 Janaoama Venkat, S/o. Ramulu, Aged about Z9 years' Occ.:- Agriculture' - u.i,rlY?-zei, Goduuiiir.trni' Ramigundam, Maiedupaka' Karimnagar - 505209 5. Janaoama Kavitha Sarojini, Wo. J Bheemaiah' Aged about 40 years Occ " :d;;ii;tlrlii.tt.. z-i-si, lnsdira Nagar, Ramagunrlam Karimnagar - 5052 9. TChiooakuthiOdemma,Wo.Mallaiah,Agedabout53ye-ars'Occ.: U.f.l". a-OiO, iriAira t'tagar, eeOOa-palle, Karimnagar - 505172'

6. Bonkuri Lalitha, Wo. Sanjeev, Aged about 48 years' Occ- Agriculture' " ' X;;i'JJi;;;: i'.r1. r-it ' Linsala, SC colonv, Linsala' Rompikunta' 8. Chippakuthi Banamma, Wo. Erra Rayqp^oqha.m, Aoed about 62 Vears' " il:As;[uliure, H.No 'i-iz. iiis tii' sb colonv, Linsaia' Rompikunta' I .lanaoama Linqaiah, Sio. Ode u' Aged about 57 years' Occ :Agriculture' - Kirimnagar - 505188. Karimnagar - 5051 88. H.No:1-52lA, Sundilla, Karimnagar - 505209' .....RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS

10. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prrncipal Secretary' Revenue ' " oep"tir.ni, Telan6ana'seiretiriat, BRKR- Bhavan' Hyderabad' Tetangana-500063. 1'1 .The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal S-ecretary' Roads and " B; itdi;;;d"pirthJnt, d""i5t"tlli-e, iio init, en rn Bhavan' Hvderabad' Telangana - 500063. .

12. The District Collector, Peddapalli District, Telangana'

13. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana. .14. The Tahsildar, Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana. '15. The Village Revenue Officer, Sundilla Village, Ramagiri Mandal Peddapalli District, Telangana.

16. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by the General tanager, RG-'1 Area, Ramagundam, Godavarikhani. .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Petitioner No.9 i.e., Janagama Srinivas to withdraw from the W.P.No.'14622 o'f 2022 and other lnterlocutory Applications. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI N.VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY, LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESENTING SMT B.RACHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER a& * * F r' r. ai.. 3 * ai, r * THB HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN I.A.No. I of2025 IN Writ Petition No.1 4622 ot2022 AND Writ Petition No.146 22 of2022 ORDER: Sri N. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, leamed counsel representing Smt. Rachana Reddy, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, would submit that both the petitioners and unofflcial respondents settled the disputes out of the Court' Therefore' he secks pennission of this Court tc withdraw the present writ petition' Hc has also fited I.A.No. I of 2025 seeking permission of this Court to ii itlrdrau the present writ petition' ln view of the aforesaid submission and having satisfied with the reasons tnentioned in the atfidavit, I'A'No l of 2025 is allowed and the rn,r'it petition is dismissed as withdrawn' Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any' pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/' 6Vo,,,"r* ';t[?niini$liqr-+g"Hs![1itl;*'flillxfq;;d*"... SEC

500063. I .t r.'::' 1F-- f, "\I *. l& i; E *r * * *r SA BS

3. The District Collector, Peddapalli District, Telangana. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana.

5. The Tahsildar, Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana. 6. The Village Revenue Officer, Sundilla Village, Ramagiri Mandal Peddapalli District, Telangana.

7. The General Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, RG-1 Area, Ramagundam, Godavarikhani.

8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

9. One CC to SMT B.RACHNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 10.One CC to SRI P SRI HARSHA REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 1 1 . Two CD Copies . ]i{i:i"'.i.];r: ,r:- * *r s s t * b $il * * a *. I s *'r HIGH COURT \ \ DATED:04/08/2025 ORDER t.A.NO.1 0F 2025 IN/AND WP.No.14622 of 2022 I ( t) o o 1 6e S Ia 16, 19 ru$ 2$6 ? ,/ t OESo^-r I.A. IS ALLOWED AND DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. Lql8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments