The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in lA.No.2 of 2019 d1.0110712019 and dismiss the petition filed by the petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the appeal in A.S.No.2B7 of 2019 by fixing an early date, in the interest of justice lA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including passing of final decree in O.S.No.79 of 2O11, on the file of the Judge, Family Court - Cum - Additional District Judge, Mahaboobnagar, pending disposal of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellants in both : SRl. A. KRISHNAM RAJU Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 in both : M/s. DHANA LAKSHMI TALLAPALEM Counsel for the Respondent No. 7 in A.S. No. 287 ot 20'19: M/s. M. ASADUDDIN F. SIDDIQUI The Court delivered the following Judgment: -/ HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAYTLI AND HON'BLT SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA-DEVI EADA I.A.No.2 of 2025 inland A.S.No.287 of 2019 JUDGMENI'.Qgr AKS,J): When lhe matter is taken up for hearing, learned courlsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is a 3" party, respondent Nos. I to 3 are the ptaintiffs and /respondent Nos' I .1 to 14 are the del''endant Nos.2 to 5 in O.S.No.79 of 2011 ' Respondent Nos.5 to [0 are t.he legal heirs of deceased 1't defendant/resrrondent No.4. Defer.rdant Nos.2 to 5/respondent Nos.1l to 14 are tlre legal heirs of one late satyamma, who is the sister of the plaint Lffs and defendant No. 1 .

2. I-earned counsel for the appellant has further surbmitted that the appellant has purchased the suit schedule property through the deceased 1" defendant/respondent No.4 and his legal heirs i'e' respondent Nos.ti and 9. The said suit was filed for partition and a preliminary dect'ee was passed thelein on 13-12-2012' l 2

3. Leamed counsel for the appellant has further submitted that the appellant has settled the issue with the plaintiffs/respondent Nos. I to 3 and defendant Nos.2 to 5/respondent Nos.ll to 14. lnsofar as settlement with the respondent Nos.5 to 10, though notices were sent to them, but they have not tumed up. Thereafter, the appellant has filed I.A.No.2 of 2025 to record the compromise by filing a compromise memo dated 06-02-2025.

4. Today the appellant/3'o pu.ty, piaintiffsirespondent Nos.l to 3 and defendant Nos.2 to 5/respondent Nos.l l to 14 are present in the Court and they were identified through their respective counsel. Smt. T. Dhanalakshmi, leamed counsel appearing for plaintiffs/respondent Nos.l to 3, has identified her parties. Therefore, leamed counsel for the appellant as well as respondent Nos.l to 3 and 1I to 14 had submitted that the present appeal may be closed in terms of compromise memo dated 06-02-2025 filed in I.A.No.2 of 2025.

5. In view of the above submissions, this Court is of the considered view that since the respondent Nos.5 to 10 have not appeared in spite of notices were served and therefore they were 7 3 called absent anrl set ex parte,hence, there is no other option except recording the compromise entered into between the appellant' plaintiffs/respondent Nos' 1 to3 and de'fendant Nos''2 to 5/respondent Nrls.l I to t4 in terms of compromise memo dated 06-02-2025 filed in I.A'No'2 of 2025'

6. Accor<iingty, I.A'No'2 of 2025 is allowed recording the terms of compromise as per compromise memo dated O6-0 )'-2025 ' Consequently. the appeal is disposed of in respect of the appellant' to3 and defendant Nos'2 to plaintiffsiresPondent Nos'l 5/respondent Nos. 1t to 14' The appeal in respect of resllondent Nos.5 to 1 1 j s concerned, since they were called absent an'C set ex parte, the ap;leaI is accordingly dismissed against respondelrt Nos'5 to 11. There strall be no order as to costs'

7. Nlist:ellaneous petitions pending, if any' shall stand ._ -_ closed. -- To, 1 //TRUE COPY// Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 1 SECTION OFFICER [' J The Judge, Family Court -cum- Additional District Judge, Mahaboobnagar' ( with records)

2. One CC to SRl. A. KRISHNAM RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to M/s. DHANA LAKSHMI TALLAPALEM, Advocate |OPUCI 4. One CC to SRI tV. ASADUDDIN F. SlDDlQUl, Advocate [OP[JC] 5. Two CD Cop'r:s (ALONG WITH A C()PY OF MEMORANDUNOF COMPROMiSE ) kul kS/ I t\ !;' $ .{'e q 1HE SI q )- Gr 2 4 APH itE '-.-n..., . ,.. ,. .,'./ ..|,-/-., HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 JUDGMENT t.A. NO. 20F 2025 1N/AND AS.No.287 of 2019 ALLOWING THE I.A- NO. 2 OF 205 AND DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ?r\q\&( t t (J o .,q ..i -/0 BEFORE THE HONtsLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT:: HYDERABAD A.S.No.287 of 2Ol9 Between: - M/s. Fortune Infra Developers Private Limited, Fortune .House, H.No.1299H, Road No.68, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-5OO033, Rep. by its Executive Director AND 1 2 J Yedira Yadamma alias Edire Satyamma W/o. Y. Sathaiah Aged about 53 years, Occ: Housewife, R/ o.Bodanampally Viliage Keshampet Mandai Mahaboobnagar District Jetta Laxmamma W/o. Balaiah Aged about 51 years, Occ: Housewife R/o.Porandla Village Maheshwaram Mandal Ranga Reddy District Nagilla Bharathamma W/o.Anjaiah, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Housewife R/o.Macherla Village, Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District ," rdnrurvE ffi fr1tE?efttiftl*.,.1 d) per LRs TTD. 'l , r)) ve Director 1 r4) ... APPELLANT/ THIRD PARTY ...RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS in O.S.No.79 /2o 1 1 Aflhi JliUTflOl rol orl rvq >) 1al..,r 'Gl''1,:)at tD n &'W:&,,*,i+, ,",:;ri ii 5 6 7 8 9 ,/t Kyama Mallzurrma W/o. late ;\.njaiah, Aged about b8 years, Occ: Housewife R/o. Kadthat Village and Manda,l Ranga Redrli District G. Shankaramma W/o.1ate C Mallaiah Aged about 48 years, Occ: Housewife R/o.Begunrpet Village Kandukur Mandai Ranga Reddl' District K. Padmanrmrr W/o.Kodacti Narayana Aged aboul- 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/ o.KakanoorVilalge Keshampel. Nlandal Mahaboobn.agar District Kyama Ilaiah, S/o.late Anjaiah, Aged about 42, years, Occ: CulLivation R/o. Kadthzrl Vitlage and Mandal Ranga Reddy l)istrict Kyama Kont raiah S/o.late Anjaiah Aged about 38 years, R/o, Kadthal \/iliage and Mandal Ranga Redcly I)istrict

10. Bhouramm:r W/o. Chagum Jangaiah Aged about 35 years, occ: Housewife R/o. Kadthal \rillage and Mandal Ranga Redd.y District (Respondent.s F"FoRruNdftq€6Etg.&g[g to 10 are legal heirs of No. 1/ Res tNo.4 herein) 01r ivq afillt Jlv30 Althl 3HUTfOi roi No. 5 PTT [ID. _I/ ,t- "r) tL) ft 'v,.l (,/ :. ....'. ,) Ir) ,+) Executir€ Director )) t1) ifu;, (-- i- /,/ 'fuEE

11. -)t Mallaiah, S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 68 years, Occ: {.griculture R/o.Lemooru Village, Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District

12. Komaramma alias Aerra Sujatha W/o.Sailu, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Porandla Village Maheshwaram Maldal, Ranga Reddy District

13. Ilaiah S/o.Mallaiah Aged about 38 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Lemuru Village Kandirkur Mandal Rdnga Reddy District

14. Shivraj, S/o.Mallaiah Aged about 32 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Lemuru Village Kaldukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS (Respondents No. 11 to 14 are Defendants No. 2 to 5) Note: Respondent No. 5 to 10 are not parties to this Compromise TERMS OF COMPROMISE BETU/EEN APPELLANT ITHIRD PARTT TO SUITI AND RESPONDENTS NO.l.2 AND S.IPLAINTIFF' s 1TO 3l AND 11TO 14 DEFEND N I 3HUTfl01 toi For FORIUNE TNFRA a) 7) l)) PV.[ t_TD Execuliye,Director )i rol3o1i0 sr ,r ,4) ,2) n'^Y,gPd |.,,:|. t9 BRIEF BACKGROUND OF THE CASE 1. The Respondents; 1,2 and 3. who are the daugh ters of la te Kyama Maisaiah, lrled O.S.No. 79 of 2,ll before the Hon,ble Judge Fanrily Court cum --VII Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar against th- Respondent No. 4 /Defendant .\.. 1 (their brother) who died. .after prerim inary Decree dated 13'12 2072 u'as granted a,d Respondents Nos. 1 1 , 12 , 13 and 1+f oefenda,ts No. 2, 3, 4 a,d 5 (who are husdand and children of cle<.eased sister of the Plaintiffs) clairni,g partition in respect of suit schedule property and -the Hon'ble District .tudge passed a Judgement allowing the rruit and granted a Preliminary Decree dated, 13. 72.2O 12. , The Respondents 1, 2 and 3 herein frled I.A. No. 199 of 2013 in O.S. No. 79 of 2011 for passing pinai Decree before the Hob'bie District Jurige. After filing the said I A' for Final Decree, the Defendant No. 1 died and to bring his LRs on record i.e., the I?r:spondents No. 5 to 10, I.A. No. 566 of 20..3 was hled and it was al1owed. 3' The appellant h.erein is a third pa-rty to ihe suit rvho pr.rrchased the suit schedule la,d through Respondents No.4, g a,d 9 prior to ard also after rrring O.S.No.79 For FORTUNE |NFM /2017 a s detailed in t.I e below table S PYT tTD a 7) r5) Eiecr:tive Direaol ) r) tD / ROT 011 lvq ?F z) 1 tL) ry.ii#;.of " ;,\J,/ . , r_ .r .l I.NO LAND LORD Name DETAITED TRANSACTIONS Survey Numbers 79t/to Ac€ts 79thL Ac.-Gts. 797172 Ac.Gts. 79212 Ac.Gts. TOTAT DOC EXTENT SAtE DEED NO KYAMA ITAIAH (Respondant No.8 in A.5. No. 287 of 2019) KYAMA KOMARAIAH (Respondant No. 9 in A.5. No. 287 of 2019) AHAII N 4o. KYAMAAN espoidant n R A.S. No. i87 of 2019/ Defendant Nq. 1 in O.S. No. 79 of 2011 AC 1-04 AC 0-04 GT5 GTS AC 3-19 GT5 AC 1-2L GT5 AC 5-00 GTS AC 5-00 GTS AC L-22 AC 3-18 GTS GT5 AC 2-O4 AC 0-04 GTS GTS AC 2-20 GTS AC 7-24 GTS 7 2 3 4 REGD DATE ,11-Ai r-12 AC 1-08 GTS 368L12072 AC s-00 GTS 3682/2OL2 11-Apr-12 AC 5-00 GTS 11-Apr-12 AC 5-00 GTS 4023/2072 | 18-AFr-12 AC 5-00 GTS 402412012 18-Apr-12 AC 2-08 GTs 4O2s/20L2 18-Apr-12 AC 2-20 GTs 4873lzOtZ 25-A r-12 Ip AC 1-24 GTS 487412Ot2 25-AAr12 KYAMA IIAIAH & KOMARAIAH (Respondant No. I and 9 in A.S' NP. 287 of "'zdtsl & KANTEKER SRINIVAS AC 1-03 GTS AC 5-05 GTS AC 6-08 GTS s436/2008 18-Jun-08 AC 13-03 GTS AC 11-08 AC 4-L2 AC 5-05 GTS GTS GTS AC 33-28 GTS

4. The suit schedule property is as under - . The Agricultural land bearing Sy.No.791/1O an extent of Ac'13-O3 Gts., Sy.No.791/11 an extent of Ac.11-08 Gts.. Sv.No.791 l12 an extent of Ac.4- For FORIUNE &iFM LID Or-] 'V'i eqfqOJ$/3O Afi:D{ :*1UTfl01ror f 3) t3) c*'&- ExeoJtive Director ,) t4) ,' t0lCA.\r,-19\i!ri,. tL) & a I ) J 12 Gts anc Sy.no.Z92/2 an extent of Ac.5_05 Gts Ac.33.28 Cirs., situated at Kadthal Village, Amangal Mandal, Mahabu bnagar:5 District (prr:sentl5r Kadthal Mandal , Ranga Reddy District)., bounded by::_ total admea NORTH SOUTH trAST WEST Neighbours land Neighbours larld Land of Defendant No. 1 I'leighbours land 5 The present appear is frled by the Apperlant after taking ieave of the Hon,bre court and raiserl various grounds against the claim of tht.piaintifl,s who._are the respondents No. 1 to 3 in the appeal. TERMsoFcoMPRO MISE 6' The Appe,ant an' Respondents No.I to 3 and 11 to 14 :.ettred the dispute raised in o's I'ro '.g of 207i, which was decreed on 13.72.2)l2against which the above appeal :is preferred by the Appellant, with the ir;tervention of werl wishers to botL dre parties amicabry on the terms and conditions detailed hereunder: a) That the AppelJant agreed to pay an amount of Rs.25,(.,0,000/_ (Rupees Twent5r Five Lal<hs onl5r) to each of the Respondents 1, 2 and 3 herein (Plaintiffs) and Rs.6,25,000/_ (Rupees Six Lakhs and Twenry Five Thousand each rt DEYELOPERS Respondents No.11 to 14 (Defendanr.s No. 2 oTJ WC af PlrI TID to- 5) "* ye Direclor Execufi r)) t+) l0lCsti! .-..' ,- -r -r t)) R ,t L,\ d F"FoR'rttElNFn T \) ,z) e.& ./ ,. 7 /'_.'a-x 1 ,i - representing the share of deceased daughter of Maisaiah towards their qlaim over suit schedule property as daughters of late Maisaiah who w1s ' th | .. I lL original Pattedar. b) That the Respondents 1, 2 and 3 (Plaintiffs) and Respondents No'l1 tp 11 (Defendants No. 2 to 5) agreed to withdraw'their claim over suit schedule pioperty and conlirm and ratify the right, title and possession of Appellar! and their successors in title over suit schedule property; which was purchased from Respondents No'4, 8 and 9 through registered sale' deed dt.18.o1.20o8 regd. as Doct.No'S43612oo8, sale deed dt'|I'O4'2ol? registgred as document No.3681/2012, 368212012 and 368312O12' sale deed dt.L8.O4.2Ol2 regd. as Doct'Nos'402312012' 4024l2Ol2' and 402512012, regd. sale deed dt.25'04 '2012, regd' as Doct'Nos'487312012 ' : and4874l2Ol2 with SRO, Kalwakurthy' ,l 1,, : c) That the Respondents.,Nq. 1 to 3 (Plaintiffs) and Respondents No'f t lto 14 (Defendants No. 2 to 5) hereby confirm and acknowledge having received the amounts detailed hereunder representing the amount agreed to be pdid by ! the Appellant as per terms of compromise' FOTFORTUNE INFRA ERS PW. LTD J.- ,) t)) Exeqrtiw Direclor t+) >) CIIJ 'l\'q AR]COJry AfflI4I I ta-) A .{ zJ"e4 . tirtJsr(l 9"1,ii)axl I S.No. 1 Cheque No. 136786 Drawn o.2.1 2.2024 136787 021 .12.2024 136788 t)')- .7

2.2024 I,Kavuri erabad I,Kanrri SB Hills, H SB Hiils, H e SBI,Kar.uri Hiils, 136790 oi .7

2.2024 136791 ct2 t.2.2024 6 136792 oi) .12.2024 136793 02 :'-2.2024 erabad SBI,Kalrrri HiiIs, H de SBI, Karruri Hills, H de SB Hills, H d erabad SBI, Kar.uri Hills, H I,Kavuri erabad Rs Favouring i0,0 o,0oo/ _ 10,0o,ooo/ _ 10,0o,0oo / _ a< o,o0o / _ Nagiili Bharathamma -_ Yadamma Edire Yedira Sa amma Jetla L&mamma Komaramma ,{erra Sujatha 2,50,oo0/ _ r). Mallaiah .)E o,ooo/_ ( Ilaiah .)E o,ooo/_ G Shivrql- S.No. Deman d Draft No 254654 1 |) Date Drawn Fi Lvouring 27 o1.,.2025 2s46si 29 .c I 2to25 254650 c7 .O1.:),O25 254651

27.o. .t,o25 254653

27.o7 2 ct25 BS I Kavur1 Hitl S H SBI,K' Hvd. !,.lln HiIis, 15,oo,ooo/_ I5,0o,ooo/- Bs I Ka yur HiI s .t BS I H SBI H d Karruri HiTS Kavuri Hil1s 15,00 ,0o0 / _ ]I J,/ s,000/_ ,3;7,5; oool _ Na gilla Bh aratham ma Yer lira Yad alir .s Sa Jet_ra L iuiii ar:._ r;a1 Konla_ramma AerraSu atha G. R,llallaiah axmamma Edire ) a\ r1) .,1 E{efirli ve Driector ;l.j ,) i'',.i i tt) t+) tL) r)akJ e\-f1L E' 7 254655 -254652 D

27.O7.2025 SBI,Kavuri Hills, Hvd. 27.OL.2025 SBI,Kavuri Hills, Hvd: 3,7s,OOO / - G. Ilaiah 3,75,OOO l- G. Shivraj d) That the Respondents No. 1 to 3 (Plaintiffs) and Respondents No. I I to 14 (Defendants No.2 to 5) hereby declare and -undertake tJlat they shall not make any claim in any form whatsoever in regard to right or interest over suit schedule property before any court, Tribunal or Authority as their,claim ) is fully satisfred by receiving the amounts mentioned in above para. ., l e) Th4t the Respondents No. 1 to 3 (Plaintiffs) and Respondents No. 11 :to 14i i (Defendants No. 2 to 5) hereby agree that they shal1 execute and register any .i i deed to confirm/ ratify the right and title acquired by the appellant over suit . .1. schedule property through the registered documents detailed hereunde4 l from Defendant No.1 and his successors in title viz., Respondents No. 8 and i t herein. st.NO TAND TORD Name KYAMA ITAIAH (Respondant No. 8 in A.5. No. 287 of 2019) or FORIUNE INFM I t >) l)) DETAITED TRANSACTIONS survey Numbers 791lLO Ac4ts AC 1-21 GTS PW. LID, 79LlLr Ac.-Gts. AC 1-04 . GTS AC 3j19 ..GIS l,." 7gLlLZ Ac.Gts. AC 0-04 GTS 79212 Ac.Gts. TOTAL DOC . EXTENT SALE DEED NO REGD DATE AC 1-08 GTS 368u20t2 l ll-AFit-72 oII-TVC ; :Fr8t5$'6)et3'1 : Wlfl?lrslz 1]'-Apr-12 ro,ti.,a nl '! ljri >) 1!) fr fteolive ,J?- t+) /\c 5-00 GTS AC5 OO GTS t\c'J.-22 GTS I AC 3-18 GTS AC 2-O4 AC 0-04 GTS GTS AC 2-20 GTS AC t-24 GTS .l e' AC 5-00 ':iTS AC 5-00 c;Ts L8-Apr-72 AC 5-00 cTs 18-Apr-12 AC 2-08 ciTs 402s/2072 18-Apr-12 AC 2-20 cTs 25-Apt-L2 AC 1-24 GTS 25-Apr-12 AC 1-03 GTS AC 5-05 GTS AC 6-08 G rS s436/2008 18-lun-08 2 3 4 KYAMA KOMARAIAH (Respondant No.9 in A.S. No; 287 0f 2019) KYAMA ANJAIAH (Respondant No.4 in A.5. No. 287 of 2019/ Defendant No. 1 in O.S. No. 79 of 2011) KYAMA AILAIAH & KOMARAIAH (Respondant No. 8 and 9 in A.S. No. 287 of 207s1 & KANTEKER SRINIVAS AC 13-03 AC 11-08 GTS GTS AC 4-12 GTS AC 5-05 GTS AC 33-28 GTS

7. The appeal mLrJ be dismissed against the Respondents No.s to 10 (legal heirs of Respondent Nc,. 4/ Defendant No. 1) who are not partie s to this compromise.

8. That the Appe .ia.et and Respondents No. 1 to 3 (plaintiffs,) and Respondents No.11 to 14 (Def,:ndants No. 2 to 5) hereby pray that the Hc;n,ble court may be pleased to pasr; a judgement and decree as per the terms rf this compromise .-d set-aside the judgment and preliminary decree dt.13 .12.2012 in For FORIUNE TNFRA 0EVELOp ERS PYT LID Executive Director gTJ I v-,C afllqo r) ,+) / T-r roix,:C g',,irr;rJ .L'\ ,,, \) z* q/ \) 'r@&. iiir,. k 1 I 20 O.S.No.Z9/2O1 1 and final decree in I.A.No.199/2O13 passed by the Hpn,bl Judge, Family Court cum VII Additional District Judge, Mahabrlb.rrgal.. , I ; For FORNNE iHrneoevEt-oPens Pw rQ' Place: Hyderabad. Date:o[,.O2.2025 e i APPEL Directol COUN R APPELLANT Yedira alias Edire Satyamma RESPONDENTNO. T/ Plaintiff No. I Nagilla Bharathamma RtrSPONDENT NO. 3/ ptaintiff No.3 n "{,aPqi Komaramma alias Aerra Sujatha RESPONDENT NO. 12lDefendAnt No .1 * Shivraj RESPONDENT NO. I 4/ Defendant No.S Jetta Laxmamma RESPONDENT NO.2/piainriif No.2 Mall RESPONDENT NO. 1 1/Defendant No.2 Ilaiah RtrSPONDENT NO.13/Defendant No.4 (oh^*'Lpst *. COUNSELF FOR RESPONDENTS NO. i TO 3 AND RESPONDENTS NO. 1 7 TO 14:, I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA AND l.A. NO. 2OF 2025|N/AND A.S. NO: 287 OF 2019 Between: [\tlls. Fortune lnfra Developers Private Limited,, Fortune House, H.No.1299H, Road No.68, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033, Rep. by its Executive Director ...APPELLANT/ 3'd Party AND 'l . Yedira Yadamma, Wo. Y. Sathaiah Aged about 53 years, Occ - Housewife, Fl/o.Bodanampally Village Keshampet lvlandal, Mahaboobnagar District. 2. Jetta laxmamma, Wo. Balaiah, Aged about 51 years, Occ - Housewife R/o.Porandla Village Maheshwaram Mandal Ranga Reddy District

3. Nagilla Bharathamma, Wo.Anjaiah, Aged about 48 years, Occ - Housewife Rl/o.Macherla Village, Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District .. ..Respondents/ Plaintiffs in O.S.No. 79 of 20'l'l

4. Kyama Anjaiah (died), per LRs 5. Kyama Mallamma, Wo. late Anjaiah, Aged about 68 years, Occ - Housewife R/o. Kadthal Village and Mandal Ranga Reddy District

6. G. Shankirramma, Wo.late G. Mallaiah Aged about 48 years, Occ - Housewife Rl/o.Begumpet Village Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District

7. K. Padmamma, Wo.Kodadi Narayana Aged about 45 years, Occ - Housewife, Rl/o, Kakanoor Village Keshampet Mandal Mahaboobnagar District

8. Kyama llaiah, S/o.late Anjaiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ - Cultivation Rl/o. Kadthal Village and Mandal Ranga Reddy Diskict

9. Kyama Komraiah, S/o.late Anjaiah Aged about 38 years, R/o. Kadthal Village and Mandal Ranga Reddy District

10.Bhouramma, Wo. Chaguru Jangaiah Aged about 35 years, occ - Housewife Rl/o. Kadthal Village and Mandal Ranga Reddy District (Legal Heirs of deceased Defendant No.1 (Anjaiah) 'l 1. Mallaiah, S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 68 years, Occ - Agriculture Rl/o.Lemooru Village, Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District

12. Komaramrna, Wo.Sailu, Aged about 36 years, Occ - Houservife, Rl/o. porandla Village Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

13.llaiah, Sio lvlallaiah Aged about 38 years, Occ - Agriculture Fyo. LemurJ Village Kandukur lt4andal Ranga Reddy District 14, Shivraj, S/o.lt/allaiah Aged about 32 yearc, Occ - Agriculture Rl/o. Lemuru Village Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District Appeal Under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 13-12-2012 in O.S.No. 79 ol 2011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court -cum- Additional District Judge, Mahaboobnagar. ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Y/,r,,Fo1,y,1" lnfra Develop^e,rsPrivate Limited,, Fortune House, H.No..l299H, Road No.68, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabrad-500033, Rep. by its Executive Director ... Petitioner/ AppELLANT/ 3.d party AND

1. Yedira Yadamma, W/o. Y. Sathaiah Aged about 53 years, Occ _ Housewife, R/o.Bodanampally Village Keshampet Mandal, Mahiboobnagar District. 2. Jetta Laxmamnra, Wo. Balaiah, Aged about 51 years, Occ - HoL.rsewife R:/o.Porandla Village Maheshwaram Mandal Ranga Rbddy Distri,:t

3. Nagilla Bharathamma, Wo_Anjaiah, Aged about 4g years, Occ _ Housewife Ri/o. frrlacheda \/ittage, Kandukur tvlandal Ranga Redty District Responolntsl Plaintiffs in O.Si.No. 79 ot 201i

4. Kyama Anjaiah (died), per LRs 5. Kyama Mallamma wo. lateanjaiah, Aged about 6g years, occ . Housewife Rr/o. Kadthal Village and Mandal Ranga Rediy District 6 G shankaramnra, wo.Jate G. Maflaiah Aged about 4g years, oc;c - Housewife Rl/o.Begumpet \/i!tage Kandukur Mandat Ranga Reddy bistriit

7. K. Padmamma w/o.Kodadi Narayana Aged about 45 years, ocr: - Housewife, Rl/o. Ka kanoor Village Keshampet Maridal Ma-haboobnagar-District

8. Kyama llaiah, s/o.late Anjaiah, Aged about 42 yearc, occ - cultir,ation Rl/o. Kadthal Village and tr,4ardal Rangb Reddt District

9. Kyama Komraiah S/o.rare Anjaiah Aged about 3g years, Rl/o. Kadthar Viilage and Mandal Ranga Reddy District- 10- thouramma, w/o. chagu.ru Jangaiah Aged about 35 years, occ - Housewife RJo. Kadthat Viuas_e and nrrand_arRan-ga neoEy oistii-i l n6ipo,iaenis G. ;i;'ib ,r" Legat Heirs of Cecpased Defendlnt ruo.f 'l nesponbenf fu;. a heiei;i- I 'I l.Mallaiah, S/o. Ramaiah.Aged about 6g years, Occ _ Agriculture R/o.Lemooru Village, Kandukur Mandal"Ranga neOOy Dsiiicl

12.Ko_maramma, W/o.Sailu, Aged qbout 36 years, Occ - Housewife, Ryo. porandla Village Maheshwaram [\rlanlal, Ranga n6OOy bistrict

13. llaiah, s/o.Mallaiah Aged about 3! vegrs, occ - Agricurture R/o. Lemuru viflage Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy District

14.shivrai, s/o.lvlailaiah Aged about 32 years, occ-- Agriculture R/o. Lemuru viilage Kandukur Mandal Ranga Reddy Distiict ' ( Respondents No. 11 to 14are Defendants No. 2 to S ) Note: Respondent No..5 to 10 are not parties to this Compromise) ..RESPONDENTS l.A. No. 2 OF 2025: petition under Section 151 of CpC praying that the High court may be pleased to pass a decree in terms of the Memorandum of compromise filed therewith as between the appelrants and respondents in the said l.A. No. 1 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. The appear and misceflaneous petition coming this day for orders as to settlement in the presence of sri. A. Krishnam Raju, Advocate for the appeflant in A.s. and Petitioner in I.A.No. 2 of 202s and of M/s. Dhana Lakshmi rallapalem, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in both , Appeflant and respondent through their respective Advocates having fired in r.A. No. 2 of 202s requesting the court to pass a decree in terms the memorandum of compromise entered into between them and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, judgment and decree of the lower court and the memo of compromise purporting to have been signed by the parties and their Advocates filed with the said l.A. No. 2 of 2025 and it is appearing from the said memorandum of compromise that the parties herein have entered into compromise and settled the matter out of court in terms memorandum of compromise filed herein. This Court DOTH R.ECORD the terms of the said memorandum of r;ompromise in original where of is filed ir the said l.A. No. 2 of 2025 and a copy whererof is annexed hereto and DOTH in terms of the said memorandum of compromise memo dated 06-02-2025 as follows

1. That the appeal is di:;posed of in respect of the appellant, plaintiffs/ respondent Nos.1 to 3 and defendant Nos. 2 to S/respondent Nos. 1'1 to 14 .

2. fhat the Appellant and Respondents No. '1 to 3 and 11 1o 14 settled the dispute raised in O.S.No 79 of 2011, which was decreed on 13-12-2012 agairrst which the above appeal is prel'ered by the Appellant, with the intervention of well wishers to both the parties amir:ably on the terms and conditions detailed hereurder: a) That the Appellarrt agreed to pay an amount of Rs. 25,00,0001 (Rupeps Twenty Five Lakhs only ) tc each of the Respondents 1 , 2 and3 herein (plaintiffs) and Rs.6,25,000/- ( Rupees Six Lakhs and Twenty Five Thousand ,)nly )to each of Respondents I\Jo. 11 to 14 (Defendants No. 2 to 5 ) representinl; the share of deceased daughter of Maisaiah towards their claim over suit schedule property as daughters of late Maisaiah who was the original pattedar. b) That the Responrjents 1, 2 and 3 ( Plaintiffs ) and Respondents No. 11 to 14 ( Defendants Nc .2 to 5 ) agreed to withdraw their claim over suit schedule property and confirm and ratify the right, title and possession of l\ppellant and their successors in title over suit schedule property, which was purrchased from Respondents No. 4, 8 and g through registered sale deed dt. 18-01-2008 regd. As Doct. Nos. 5436,' 2008, sale deed dt. 11-04-2012 registered as documents No. 3681/2012 , ?-'68212012 and 368312012 sale deed dt. 18-04-2012 regd. As Doct. Nos. 40231i?-012, 4O24t2O12 and 4025 t2O12, regd. Sale deed dI. 2S_O4_ I 2012 , regd. as Doct. Nos. 4873 12012 and 4874 12012, 2i5h SRO, Kalwakurthy. c) That the Respondents No. 1 to 3 ( Plaintiffs and Respondents No. 1 1 to 14 ( 1 Defendants No. 2 to 5 ) hereby confirm and acknowledge having received the amounts detailed hereunder representing the amount agreed to be paid by the Appellant as per terms of compromise. S.No Cheque Date Drawn Rs Favouring I 2 3 4 5 6 7 No. 136786 02-t2-2024 SBI, Karuri Hills, 10,00,000/- Nagilla Hyderabad Bharathamma 136787 02-12-2024 SBI, Kawri Hills, 10,00,000/- Hyderabad YediraYadamma Edire Satyamma 136788 02-12-2024 SBI, Kamri Hills, 10,00,000/- Komaramma alias Hyderabad Aerra Sujatha 136790 02-12-2024 SBI, Kaurri Hills, 2,50,000/- Komaramma alias Hyderabad Aerra Sujatha 136791 02-12-2024 SBI, Kawri Hills, 2,50,000/ G. Mallaiah Hyderabad t36792 02-12-2024 SBI, Kavuri Hills, 2,50,000/- G. Ilaiah t36793 02-12-2024 SBI, Kavuri Hills, 2,50,0001- G. Shiwaj Hyderabad Hyderabad S.No Derta r.d Date Drawn Rs Favouring Draft |tro I 2 3 4 5 6 7 25L5:,4 27-0t-2025 SBI Kar.uri Hills, 15,00.00,11 Nagilla Hyderabad Bharathamma l -\4l): / 29-01-2025 SBI Karuri Hills, 15,00.00D/- Yedira Yadamma Hyderabad alias Edire Satyamma 25465C 27 -01-2025 SBI Kavuri Hills, 15,00,00r)/- Jetla Laxmamma Hyderabad 254(,51 27-0t-2025 SBI Kavuri Hills, 3,75,000/ - Komaramma Alias Hyderabad Aerra Sujatha 254t5) 27-0t-2025 SBI Kavuri Hills, 3,75,000/. ,G. Mallaiah Hyderabad 254(i5 t 27 -0t-2025 SBI Kawri Hills,

3.7s,000t G. Ilaiah Hyderabad 254ti5'..1 27 -01-2025 SBI Karuri Hills, 3,7 5,000t G Shiwaj Hyderabad d) That tlL: F-cspondents No. r to 3 ( plaintiffs ) and Respondents No. 1l to 14 ( Defendants N':. 2 to 5 ) hereby declare and undertake that the,r shall not make any claim in an'i lorm whatsoever in regard to right or interest over suit schedure property before any oout, 'lribunal or Authority as their craim is fulry sati,;fied by receiving thc amounts rlentioned in above para e) That the Respondents No. 1 to 3 ( plaintiffs ) and Respondents No. 1l to 14 ( Defendants I'k,. 2 to 5 ) hereby agree that they shall execute and register any deed to confirm / rarrfir the right and title acquired by the appelant over s -rit schedule property through the repistered documents detailed hereunder from Det-r:ndant No.r and his successors rr title viz., Respondcnts No. g and 9 herein.

3. The appeal may be dismissed against the Respondents No. 5 to r0 ( legar heirs 9f Respondent No. 4/ Defendant No. 1 who are not parties to this compromise.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Judge, Family court -cum- Additionar District Judge, Mahaboobnagar. 2. fwo C.d.Copies v, HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 DECREE FOR COMPROMISE l.A. NO. 20F 2025 IN/AND AS.No.287 of 2019 ALLOWING THE I.A, }I(). 2 OF 205 AND DISPOSING OF THI] ,\PJEAL WITHOUT COSTS N &t