✦ High Court of India · 25 Mar 2026

M/s Lakshme Builders and Co v. (Stamps and Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Mar 2026
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Mar 2026
Length
1,282 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Directton more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action and inaction of the respondents in continuing the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.11.38 guntas in Sy.No.57, situated at Jallpally Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the prohibited properties list in the IGRS web portal and in refusing to receive and register documents, as illegal, arbitrary and without authority of law and contrary to the proceedings issued by the District Collector, Ranga Reddy District vide Lr.No.E11414412024, daled 27 -10-2025. and consequentty direct the respondents to delete/de-notify the petitioner's land from the prohibited properties list and permit and receive, proces:i and register the documents presented by the petitioner in respect of the said propo :)/. l.A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circums.r rrces stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be p| ;rsed to direct the respondents, more particularly the 3rd respondent, to receive, pr )cess and register the documents presented by the petitioner in respect of land ad r easuring Ac_'1 1.38 guntas in Sy.No.57, situated at Jallpally Vlllage, Balapur Marr al, Ranga Reddy Districtwithout reference to the prohibited properties list reflect(x in the IGRS web portal and in conformity with the proceedings issued by the Distri t Collector, Ranga Reddy District vide Lr.No.E1/414412024, dated 27-1O-2O25, perc ng disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: Ms. S.SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS & REGIS.. IATION The Cou( made the following: ORDER I ! I i I ; I i I I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.8946 OF 2026 25th MARCH,20.26 Between: M/s Laskhme Builders and Co., A registered firm No.223B of 2OO7, Having its registered off,rce at No. 1-7-510/E/3, Gemini Colony, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. Rep.by its Managing Partner: Mr.Pallav Kumar Poosa, S/o Nanda Kumar Poosa, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No. | -7 -51 O I E I 3, Gemini Colony, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. AND Petitioner State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and (02) others. ORDER: ... Respondents This Writ Petition is hled seeking the following relief:- "...to issue a writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Maldamus, declarilg the action and inaction of the respondents in continuing the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac. 1 1.38 guntas in Sy.No.57, situated at Jallpally viJlage, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the prohibited properties list in the IGRS web portal 2 PK'J No.a946 o! 2026 v ill"&r'iil. rt+:fii:{::q:"x:ffi [t H i il contrary to the proceedrX*-ii""-'-rt'",n" r c€ Collector, Ranga T' i.l*".'Ji ). tqqlzo'zq. dated 27 to'2o2s' '',: i.""""0"r".,,, d.irect .,.l::"..=*r=lTo"r:t;,1: delete / clerrotifY the Pettl orohibit ecl propcrtres ltst and permit and tl ' I '.ll :i:::="';"; iil ,""r""". in"t""p""t of the said property a 1 I Lo 'ov ordir or orders".'' o""J=r.r'r "trt"r ;igister thc documents presenrc( 2 Heard Mr. Katika Ravinder Reddy' learnet counsel for the petitioner and Ms'S'sravanthi' learne I Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the responder ts' I i. I I I I 3 4 Perused the material available on record Learned. counsel for the petitloner sub r itted that the is the absolute owner and Poss:ssor of land Sy.No.5', situated at Ranga leddY District' petitloner admeasurrng Ac. 1 1 .38 guntas ln JallpallY village, BalaPur Mandal, regir; ered sale deed having acquired the same through bearing Document No 443O of 2008' dated' )2'O7 '2008 and ever since the date of purchase the petitio r':r has been in continuous, peaceful and lawful possession nd enjoyment of and his name is dul-r- :eflected in the the said Property Pattadar Passbook issued by the Reventr: authorities He further submitted that the petitioner has c eveloped the said I 3 P'(,J W.P.No.A946 o! 2026 lald into residential plots and has already alienated several plots through registered sale deeds, which were duly accepted u,ithout any obj ection. However, when the petitioner attempted to alienate one of the remaining plots, the respondent No.3 refused to receive and process the document on the ground that the subject survey number is shown in the prohibited list in the IGRS Portal, and the server/valuation certificate issued by the Sub-Registrar Office, Champapet also reflects that "registration of this property is prohibited". It is further submitted that the District Collector, being the competent authority, has issued proceedings uide Lr. No. E 1 / 4 1 44 I 2024, dated 27 . 1O.2025, communicating the updated list of prohibited properties to the Registration Department, and as per the said proceedings, the subject larld in Sy.No.S7 of Jalpally Village does not find place in the said prohibited list and does not fall under any notified category. Therefore, petitioner has submitted a representation dated 04.02.2026 with a request to delete the Sy.No.S7 of Jalpally Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from the Online Prohibited Properties list maintained in CCA/CARD. Pursuant to the said letter, the respondent No.3 4 PK,J /.P.No.a946 of 2026 ( addressed a letter to the respondent No'2 vide letter dated 05.02.2026 in L.R.No.37 of 2026' However, so 1rr no action has been taken by the respondent No'2' T1 t:refore' the petitioner seeks induigence of this Court'

5. Having regard to the submissions made 1r ' the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistar' Government Pleader, this Court deems it appropriate t ) direct the respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders :n the letter addressed by the respondent No 3 uide letter dated 05.02.2026 in L.R.No.37 of 2026 by duJl taking into consideration the letter issued by the District l"ollector ' uide Letter No.El 14144 12024, dated 27'lO2025' r ithin a period of two (02) u,eeks from the date of copy of this ( rder'

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petit c'n is disposed of. There shall be no orders as to costs' Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' //TRUE COPY// S I /. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI A( SISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary (Stamps and Registration) S,ecretariat, Hyderabacj, State of Telangana.

2. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District 3. The Sub-Registrar, Champapet, Ranga Reddy Distri: .

4. One CC to SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY' Advocate IOPUCI 5. Two CCs to GP fOn SfnfrlpS & REGISTRATION' High Court for the State " ;ir;;;r;a. at HYderabad tourl 6. Two CD CoPies BsR 4i, \ HIGH COURT DATED: 2510312026 CC TODAY )'l( *6 $ ? t t,:f (t a: C) LL & Hc/H ORDER WP.No.8946 of 2026 I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS j 0 1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments