B. Sreeramulu v. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Dec 2004
- Bench
- M NARAYANA REDDY
Outcome
Dismissed
Appeal is dismissed
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rapthadu Mandal, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Mr.O.MANOHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per The Honourable Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice) We see no reason…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1927 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/10/2004 in WP No. 19860 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: B. Sreeramulu, S/o. Narasimhulu, R/o. Ayyavarapalli Mandal, Rapthadu Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... APPELLANT AND
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur.
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rapthadu Mandal, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Mr.O.MANOHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per The Honourable Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice) We see no reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge relegating the petitioner to the alternative efficacious remedy of appeal. Therefore, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. ______________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J.
3.12.2004. ________________________ M.NARAYANA REDDY, J. VR. To
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rapthadu Mandal, Anantapur District.
Two CCs to Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
Two CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 03 Dec 2004. The bench was M NARAYANA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.