Valsetty_Eadamma v. The State.oJ T-ql.anga1g

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents police inpreventing and threatening the Petitioner not to enter into the land of the petitioner /.' admeasuring Ac. 0.30 gts. in Sy.No. 206, Thekkellapadu Village, tt/iryalguda I\ilandal, Nalgonda District as illegal, arbitrary and u n constitution a I and amounts to violation of the decree passed in o.s.No. 366 of 2013 dl. 23-01-2025 on the file of senior civil Judge, t\Iiryalguda and consequently direct the respondents Police not to stop/prevent the Petitioner from cultivating her land lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 qPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supPort of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 & 4 not to stopiprevent the Petitioner from entering her land admeasuring Ac. 0,30 gts. in Sy.No. 206, Thekkellapadu Village, [/iryalguda ItIandal, Nalgonda District. Counsel for the Pgtitionerr : SRI G.SUNDARESAN CounsEI fOr RESPqNdENIS NO.1tO4;SRI G.ANIKETH REDDY,AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Bespgndents No,5to9 : The Court made the following: ORDER u THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.9896 ot 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.Aniketh Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 9 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the respondents-authorities are calling the petitioner to the police station and are threatening her to not to enter the land admeasuring Ac.0.30 guntas situated in Sy.No.206, Thekketlapadu Viilage, Miryalguda Mandal, Nalgonda District, in spite of the petitioner having succeeded in the suit filed by her, vide O.S.No.366 of 2013 by the virtue of the judgment and decree dt.23.01.2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalguda. 2

4. Petitioner further contends that the action of the respondents- authorities in threatening the petitioner not to enter the land to cut the paddy sowed by her, in spite of the petitioner succeeding in the suit filed by her against the unofficial respondents herein, amounts to respondents- authorities involving in civil dispute, which is totally illegal, arbitrary and without sanctlon of law.

5. Per contra, learned Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 submits that the 7th respondent in the present Writ Petition had lodged a complaint with the 4th respondent on 25.03.2025, claiming that he has purchased the said land from respondent No.B and the same to his daughter. -cifted

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that based on the complaint lodged by the 7rh respondent, the authorities have registered a case, vide Crime No.12B of 2025 on 25.03.2025, wherein the petitioner is arrayed as accused No. 1.

7. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the respondents-a uthorities, except causing investigation into the aforesaid crime registered. are not interfering in the civil disputes that may exist between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and that the authorities are conducting investigation into the aforesaid crime registere? Itraccordance with law 3

8. I have taken note of the respective contentions urged.

9. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and since, the respondents-authorities claim to have registered a case against the petitioner herein, vide Crime No.128 of 2025 dt.Z5.03.ZO2S, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed to conduct investigation into the aforesaid crime strictly in accordance with law and are restrained from interfering in the civil dispute.

10. Subject to above observation and direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

11. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Princioal Secretary, Home Department Secr Telangand, HYderabad SD/. K. AMMAJI EPUW REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER at Buildings, State of

2. The Superintendent of Police' Nalgonda District' Nalgonda' 3. The Circle lnspector of Police, Miryalguda Rural Police Station' Nalgonda District. 4 The Sub-lnspector of Police, Miryalguda Rural Police Station' Nalgonda District. 5 One CC to SRI G SUNDARESAN' Advocate lOPUCl 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] 7. Two CD CoPies BSK SS fuc'- E HIGH COURT DATED:02104t2025 \ c glAIf: \1^ ( i 2 B I1A\ 2025 : ;{' , ORDER WP.No.9896 of 2025 DfsPAi;s cO DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTON WITHOUT COSTS ")e\eb4